diff options
| author | Luke T. Shumaker <lukeshu@lukeshu.com> | 2024-06-08 22:37:43 -0600 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Luke T. Shumaker <lukeshu@lukeshu.com> | 2024-06-08 22:37:43 -0600 |
| commit | 9e8cd065f4b6baf20005870cf5df4dcd2ce9528b (patch) | |
| tree | 3a857e3f30ad990de305aef14186b4cda44b4c55 | |
| parent | e480d172a38df962b8b0a5b051c0bb520f7f618b (diff) | |
oops, fix ws
| -rw-r--r-- | public/message-threading.md | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/public/message-threading.md b/public/message-threading.md index eb83705..a710631 100644 --- a/public/message-threading.md +++ b/public/message-threading.md @@ -31,11 +31,11 @@ feedback valuable. You write that the algorithm in RFC 5256 is merely a <q>restating</q> of your algorithm, but I noticed 3 (minor) differences: - + 1. In your step 1.C, the RFC says to check whether this would create a loop, and if it would to skip creating the link; your version only says to perform this check in step 1.B. - + 2. The RFC says to sort the messages by date between your steps 4 and 5; that is: when grouping by subject, containers in the root set should be processed in date-order (you do not specify an order), |