summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/public/arch-systemd.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'public/arch-systemd.html')
-rw-r--r--public/arch-systemd.html84
1 files changed, 84 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/public/arch-systemd.html b/public/arch-systemd.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8c5b705
--- /dev/null
+++ b/public/arch-systemd.html
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html lang="en">
+<head>
+ <meta charset="utf-8">
+ <title>What Arch Linux's switch to systemd means for users — Luke T. Shumaker</title>
+ <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
+ <link rel="stylesheet" href="assets/style.css">
+ <link rel="alternate" type="application/atom+xml" href="./index.atom" name="web log entries"/>
+</head>
+<body>
+<header><a href="/">Luke T. Shumaker</a> » <a href=/blog>blog</a> » arch-systemd</header>
+<article>
+<h1 id="what-arch-linuxs-switch-to-systemd-means-for-users">What Arch
+Linux’s switch to systemd means for users</h1>
+<p>This is based on a post on <a
+href="http://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/zoffo/systemd_we_will_keep_making_it_the_distro_we_like/c66nrcb">reddit</a>,
+published on 2012-09-11.</p>
+<p>systemd is a replacement for UNIX System V-style init; instead of
+having <code>/etc/init.d/*</code> or <code>/etc/rc.d/*</code> scripts,
+systemd runs in the background to manage them.</p>
+<p>This has the <strong>advantages</strong> that there is proper
+dependency tracking, easing the life of the administrator and allowing
+for things to be run in parallel safely. It also uses “targets” instead
+of “init levels”, which just makes more sense. It also means that a
+target can be started or stopped on the fly, such as mounting or
+unmounting a drive, which has in the past only been done at boot up and
+shut down.</p>
+<p>The <strong>downside</strong> is that it is (allegedly) big,
+bloated<a href="#fn1" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref1"
+role="doc-noteref"><sup>1</sup></a>, and does (arguably) more than it
+should. Why is there a dedicated systemd-fsck? Why does systemd
+encapsulate the functionality of syslog? That, and it means somebody is
+standing on my lawn.</p>
+<p>The <strong>changes</strong> an Arch user needs to worry about is
+that everything is being moved out of <code>/etc/rc.conf</code>. Arch
+users will still have the choice between systemd and SysV-init, but
+rc.conf is becoming the SysV-init configuration file, rather than the
+general system configuration file. If you will still be using SysV-init,
+basically the only thing in rc.conf will be <code>DAEMONS</code>.<a
+href="#fn2" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref2"
+role="doc-noteref"><sup>2</sup></a> For now there is compatibility for
+the variables that used to be there, but that is going away.</p>
+<aside id="footnotes" class="footnotes footnotes-end-of-document"
+role="doc-endnotes">
+<hr />
+<ol>
+<li id="fn1"><p><em>I</em> don’t think it’s bloated, but that is the
+criticism. Basically, I discount any argument that uses “bloated”
+without backing it up. I was trying to say that it takes a lot of heat
+for being bloated, and that there is be some truth to that (the
+systemd-fsck and syslog comments), but that these claims are largely
+unsubstantiated, and more along the lines of “I would have done it
+differently”. Maybe your ideas are better, but you haven’t written the
+code.</p>
+<p>I personally don’t have an opinion either way about SysV-init vs
+systemd. I recently migrated my boxes to systemd, but that was because
+the SysV init scripts for NFSv4 in Arch are problematic. I suppose this
+is another <strong>advantage</strong> I missed: <em>people generally
+consider systemd “units” to be more robust and easier to write than SysV
+“scripts”.</em></p>
+<p>I’m actually not a fan of either. If I had more time on my hands, I’d
+be running a <code>make</code>-based init system based on a research
+project IBM did a while ago. So I consider myself fairly objective; my
+horse isn’t in this race.<a href="#fnref1" class="footnote-back"
+role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
+<li id="fn2"><p>You can still have <code>USEDMRAID</code>,
+<code>USELVM</code>, <code>interface</code>, <code>address</code>,
+<code>netmask</code>, and <code>gateway</code>. But those are minor.<a
+href="#fnref2" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
+</ol>
+</aside>
+
+</article>
+<footer>
+ <aside class="sponsor"><p>I'd love it if you <a class="em"
+ href="/sponsor/">sponsored me</a>. It will allow me to continue
+ <a class="em" href="/imworkingon/">my work</a> on the GNU/Linux
+ ecosystem. Thanks!</p></aside>
+
+<p>The content of this page is Copyright © 2012 <a href="mailto:lukeshu@lukeshu.com">Luke T. Shumaker</a>.</p>
+<p>This page is licensed under the <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</a> license.</p>
+</footer>
+</body>
+</html>