summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/public/fs-licensing-explanation.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'public/fs-licensing-explanation.md')
-rw-r--r--public/fs-licensing-explanation.md2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/public/fs-licensing-explanation.md b/public/fs-licensing-explanation.md
index a8ef5ac..9bed879 100644
--- a/public/fs-licensing-explanation.md
+++ b/public/fs-licensing-explanation.md
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ This is based on a post on [reddit][1], published on 2013-02-21.
> Foundation Inc". How can software be both licensed under GNU and
> copyrighted to a single group? It was my understanding that once
> code became free it didn't belong to any particular group or
-> individual.
+> individual.
>
> [LiveCode is GPLv3, but also sells non-free licenses] Can you really
> have the same code under two conflicting licenses? Once licensed