From 7115b71c353c004dbfe70a0d96012a2213e77405 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Luke Shumaker Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 07:12:18 -0500 Subject: whitespace cleanup --- public/fs-licensing-explanation.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'public/fs-licensing-explanation.md') diff --git a/public/fs-licensing-explanation.md b/public/fs-licensing-explanation.md index a8ef5ac..9bed879 100644 --- a/public/fs-licensing-explanation.md +++ b/public/fs-licensing-explanation.md @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ This is based on a post on [reddit][1], published on 2013-02-21. > Foundation Inc". How can software be both licensed under GNU and > copyrighted to a single group? It was my understanding that once > code became free it didn't belong to any particular group or -> individual. +> individual. > > [LiveCode is GPLv3, but also sells non-free licenses] Can you really > have the same code under two conflicting licenses? Once licensed -- cgit v1.2.3