From 8303f7626e61d6aeadc5ccf04bda12474acb6cd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Luke Shumaker Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 16:26:12 -0400 Subject: spell check --- public/fs-licensing-explanation.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'public/fs-licensing-explanation.md') diff --git a/public/fs-licensing-explanation.md b/public/fs-licensing-explanation.md index df4f24d..3e30975 100644 --- a/public/fs-licensing-explanation.md +++ b/public/fs-licensing-explanation.md @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ This is based on a post on [reddit][1], published on 2013-02-21. > individual. > > [LiveCode is GPLv3, but also sells non-free licenses] Can you really -> have the same code under two conflicting licences? Once licensed +> have the same code under two conflicting licenses? Once licensed > under GPL3 wouldn't they too be required to adhere to its rules? I believe that GNU/the FSF has an FAQ that addresses this, but I can't -- cgit v1.2.3