6 files changed, 283 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/HACKING/build-system.md b/HACKING/build-system.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..93770cc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/HACKING/build-system.md
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+The build system is built around an automake-like system for GNU Make
+that I wrote.  It is documented in `automake.txt`.  It provides all of
+the standard targets and such; you tell it what to do by setting a
+series of `am_whatever` variables.  I'm just going to call it
+"automake" here.
+
+I also hook into non-exposed parts of automake with a couple of
+`_am_whatever` variables.  Hopefully I will come up with good ways to
+expose the needed functionality in the future.
+
+There are a couple of variables that get automatically set from git.
+This happens by `include`ing a hidden makefile that sets them; if
+`$(topsrcdir)/.git` exists, it knows to use git to generate it;
+otherwise it expects the file to exist:
+
+| variable           | file                                   |
+|--------------------+----------------------------------------|
+| srcfiles           | $(srcdir)/.srcfiles.mk                 |
+| LIBRETOOLS_VERSION | $(topsrcdir)/.srcversion-libretools.mk |
+| LIBRETOOLS_COMMIT  | $(topsrcdir)/.srcversion-libretools.mk |
+| DEVTOOLS_VERSION   | $(topsrcdir)/.srcversion-devtools.mk   |
+| DEVTOOLS_COMMIT    | $(topsrcdir)/.srcversion-devtools.mk   |
+
+`srcfiles` basically becomes `am_src_files`.
diff --git a/HACKING/code-quality.md b/HACKING/code-quality.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a520ce5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/HACKING/code-quality.md
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+Code content
+============
+
+Be aware of the `librelib(7)` library suite, which lives `src/lib`.
+It is a suite of Bash libraries that will help you out.  Most of the
+people looking at the libretools code are familiar with the `messages`
+part of it, which actually contains a bunch of utility routines, not
+just message printing.  There is also a library for dealing with
+`blacklist.txt`, and one for loading configuration files and
+PKGBUILDs.  These are common tasks, but are tricky to handle
+consistently--the libraries are there to make things easier.  Take a
+look at the man pages.
+
+Message printing: All of the message printing routines, except for
+`term_title` and `flag`,  take printf-type arguments.  Take advantage
+of that; don't use string interpolation (don't do `"foo ${var}
+bar"`).  The reason for this is that if you don't do string
+interpolation, messages can be automatically internationalized.
+(Internationalization is incomplete at the momement)
+
+Message printing: The in `--help`/`-h` text, use `print` to print
+lines that should not wrap, `echo` to print blank lines, `prose` to
+print paragraphs, `bullet` to print bullet points, and `flag` to print
+option flags.  The text should follow this general format:
+
+    print "Usage: %s [OPTIONS] VARS_ARE_UNDERSCORE_AND_CAPITAL" "${program_name}"
+	print "One line description of program, no period"
+	echo
+	prose "More details.  This is a paragraph."
+	echo
+	print "Options:"
+	flag  "-h"         "Show this message"
+
+In the "Usage:" line, use printf `%s` and the value `"${0##*/}"` to
+determine the program name at runtime.
+
+There used to be guidelines for how to align the option flags and
+descriptions, but now the `flag` command exists takes care of it for
+you.  Yay for things being easier!
+
+When using `set -u`, `set -e`, or `trap`, you should also use `set -E`
+to have the error handling be passed down to subshells.
+
+Feel free to use `set -e` (fail on error), but be careful of the
+caveats (there are a bunch of them); don't assume all errors are
+checked because of it.
+
+Use `set -u` if you can; it makes using an unset variable an error.
+ - If a variable not being set is valid (perhaps a configuration
+   option), use `${var:-}` when accessing it to suppress the error.
+ - An empty array counts as unset, so if you have an array that may be
+   empty, use `set +u` before accessing it.
+   - The reason for this is that a normal string variable is basically
+     an array with length=1; an unset variable looks like an array
+     with length=0.  Weird stuff.
+
+In the shebang, use `#!/usr/bin/env bash`.  This allows us to not
+hardcode the location of bash (I'm not sure why this is useful for
+something distro-dependent like libretools, but fauno seems to have a
+use-case for it).
+
+In the shebang, don't pass flags to bash, besides breaking `env`
+(above), it means people will make mistakes when debugging, and
+running things with `bash FILENAME`.  Instead, use `set` to adjust the
+flags inside of the program.
+
+Obey `$TMPDIR`.  It's usually as easy as passing `--tmpdir` to
+`mktemp`.
+
+Use `trap` to clean up your temporary files.  This way, even if your
+program terminates early, things will be cleaned up.
+
+Bash best practices
+===================
+
+Basically, know what you are doing, and be safe with it.  The problem
+is that most people don't know about safe bash scripting.
+
+A lot of people look at the "Advanced Bash Scripting" ebook--DO NOT do
+that, it is trash... though it contains a "reference card" page that
+may be useful and isn't trash.
+
+Take a look at Gentoo's Bash guidelines
+<http://devmanual.gentoo.org/tools-reference/bash/index.html>.
+They're pretty good, and cover most of the "gotcha's" about Bash
+syntax.  It mentions but discourages the use of Bash 3
+features... why?  Who still uses Bash 2?  Feel free to use Bash 4
+features!
+
+I wrote an article on Bash arrays
+<https://lukeshu.com/blog/bash-arrays.html>.  A lot of people think
+they're tricky, but they're simple once you know how they work.  It's
+short enough that you should read the whole thing.  Know the
+difference between `"${array[@]}"` and `"${array[*]}"`.  And I'll say
+it again here, ALWAYS wrap those in double quotes; there is no reason
+I can think of that the unquoted behavior would ever be the correct
+thing.
+
+My brief rules of thumb:
+
+ - Quote every variable.
+   - That includes arrays: `"${array[@]}"` and `"${array[*]}"`.
+   - In most (but not all!) cases inside of `[[ ... ]]` conditions,
+     variables don't need to be quoted.  When in doubt, quote them.
+   - When assigning one variable to another, you don't need quotes;
+     you don't need quotes for `foo=$bar`
+ - Try to avoid global variables; declare all variables in functions
+   with `local`.
+   - Or `declare`; inside of a function, unless you pass the `-g`
+     flag, `declare` makes the variable local.
+ - Use `local VAR` before a `for VAR in LIST` loop--the variable is created in the
+   current scope, not the scope of the loop.
+ - Feeding input to `while` loops is weird because of how subshells
+   work:
+
+	# Input from a file
+	# BAD
+	cat file | while read line; do
+		...
+	done
+	# GOOD
+	while read line; do
+		...
+	done <file
+
+	# Input from a program
+	# BAD
+	prog | while read line; do
+		...
+	done
+	# GOOD
+	while read line; do
+		...
+	done < <(prog)
diff --git a/HACKING/code-style.md b/HACKING/code-style.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..077bc49
--- /dev/null
+++ b/HACKING/code-style.md
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+The style guidelines aren't terribly strict.  As long as things are
+consistent per-file, I'm pretty happy.
+
+Style guidelines
+================
+
+Unless you have a good reason, use `[[ ... ]]` instead of `[ ... ]`;
+they work similarly, but `[[ ... ]]` is sometimes more readable (fine,
+rarely, but never less), and is harder to make mistakes with quoting,
+because it is syntactic magic, as opposed to `[ ... ]` which is an
+executable which just happens to be implemented as a builtin.
+
+Use a litteral tab for indent.  When indenting line-wrapped text, such
+as that for `prose`, do it like this:  (» indicates tab, · indicates
+space)
+
+	func() {
+	»   prose "This is the first line. This paragraph is going to be
+	»   ·······wrapped."
+	}
+
+The `; then` and `; do` should go on the same line as
+`if`/`elif`/`for`/`while`.  Also, there is no space before the `;`.
+
+Prefer the `for VAR in LIST` syntax over the `for ((init; cond; inc))`
+syntax, when possible.  For example (heh, `for` example):
+
+	local i
+	for (( i = 1 ; i <= 10 ; i++ )); do
+
+should be
+
+	local i
+	for i in {1..10}; do
+
+Of course, if the upper bound is a variable, the C-like syntax is
+the better option, as otherwise you would have to use `seq` (calling
+an external), or `eval` (gross, easy to mess up royally).
+
+Indent comments like you would code; don't leave them at the beginning
+of the line.  Example:
+
+	for item in "${list[@]}"; do
+		if [[ $item == foo ]]; then
+	# BAD
+			foobar
+		fi
+		if [[ $item == bar ]]; then
+			# GOOD
+			barbaz
+		fi
+	done
+
+Fauno, I'm sorry.  But I don't know how you can read your own code :P.
+
+Some people argue in favor of the useless use of cat, because data
+should flow from left to right.  However, the input redirection
+doesn't have to go on the right side of a command:
+
+	cat file | program  # useless use of cat
+	program < file      # data flows right to left
+	< file program      # just right
diff --git a/HACKING/contributing.md b/HACKING/contributing.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..65066b5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/HACKING/contributing.md
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+Contributing
+============
+
+I'd love to have your patches!  Code should be hackable; if you want
+to modify something, but can't figure out how: 1) ping me for help, 2)
+it probably means the code was too complicated in the first place.
+
+Patches should be sent to <dev@lists.parabolagnulinux.org>; please put
+"[PATCH]" and "libretools" in the subject line.  If you have commit
+access, but want me to look over it first, feel free to create a new
+branch in git, and I will notice it.  Try to avoid pushing to the
+"master" branch unless it's a trivial change; it makes it easier to
+review things; though I *will* look over every commit before I do a
+release, so don't think you can sneak something in :)
+
+Be sure to make sure to follow the licensing requirements in
+`HACKING/licensing.md`
+
+I'd love to discuss possible changes on IRC (I'm lukeshu), either on
+irc.freenode.net#parabola or in personal messages.  My account may be
+online even if I'm not; I will eventually see your message, I do a
+search for mentions of "luke" on #parabola every time I get on.
+
+Please write unit tests for new functionality.  Or old functionality.
+Please write unit tests!  See `HACKING/testing.md` for details on
+testing.
diff --git a/HACKING/licensing.md b/HACKING/licensing.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6d17e31
--- /dev/null
+++ b/HACKING/licensing.md
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+We don't require copyright assignment or any fancy paperwork!  Just
+make sure you specify the license and include a copyright statement
+with your name and the current year.
+
+New code should (please) be licensed GPLv2+.  I say v2 instead of v3
+because some code from Arch is GPLv2 (no "or any later version"), and
+having to worry about which programs can be combined is a huge pain.
+
+Copyright statements should look like
+
+	# Copyright (C) YEARS NAME <EMAIL>
+
+for most code, for 3rd-party code that has been imported, indent it a
+bit:
+
+	#   Copyright (C) YEARS NAME <EMAIL>
+
+Always put a line with `# License:` specifying the license of that
+file.
diff --git a/HACKING/testing.md b/HACKING/testing.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8dee485
--- /dev/null
+++ b/HACKING/testing.md
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+Testing
+=======
+
+Please write unit tests for new things.  Tests can be run with `make
+check`, which just runs `./testenv roundup` in the `test/` directory.
+Relatedly, you need the `roundup` (the `sh-roundup` package on
+Parabola) tool to run the tests.  `./testenv` can be given
+`--no-network` and/or `--no-sudo` to dissable tests that require those
+things.  Make can be made to pass those things in by setting
+`TESTENVFLAGS`.  If you don't dissable either, I *strongly* recommend
+setting TMPDIR to somewhere on a btrfs partition before running the
+tests; otherwise the chroot tests will take forever.  I mean, they
+already take long on btrfs, but without it... _dang_.
+
+I also recommend having the `haveged` daemon running.  That's good
+general advice, but also: some of the tests make GPG keys, this
+"should" take on the order of 1 second, but can take several minutes
+if you don't have `haveged` running.