summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/BUG-HUNTING
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndré Fabian Silva Delgado <emulatorman@parabola.nu>2015-08-05 17:04:01 -0300
committerAndré Fabian Silva Delgado <emulatorman@parabola.nu>2015-08-05 17:04:01 -0300
commit57f0f512b273f60d52568b8c6b77e17f5636edc0 (patch)
tree5e910f0e82173f4ef4f51111366a3f1299037a7b /Documentation/BUG-HUNTING
Initial import
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/BUG-HUNTING')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/BUG-HUNTING246
1 files changed, 246 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/BUG-HUNTING b/Documentation/BUG-HUNTING
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..65022a87b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/BUG-HUNTING
@@ -0,0 +1,246 @@
+Table of contents
+=================
+
+Last updated: 20 December 2005
+
+Contents
+========
+
+- Introduction
+- Devices not appearing
+- Finding patch that caused a bug
+-- Finding using git-bisect
+-- Finding it the old way
+- Fixing the bug
+
+Introduction
+============
+
+Always try the latest kernel from kernel.org and build from source. If you are
+not confident in doing that please report the bug to your distribution vendor
+instead of to a kernel developer.
+
+Finding bugs is not always easy. Have a go though. If you can't find it don't
+give up. Report as much as you have found to the relevant maintainer. See
+MAINTAINERS for who that is for the subsystem you have worked on.
+
+Before you submit a bug report read REPORTING-BUGS.
+
+Devices not appearing
+=====================
+
+Often this is caused by udev. Check that first before blaming it on the
+kernel.
+
+Finding patch that caused a bug
+===============================
+
+
+
+Finding using git-bisect
+------------------------
+
+Using the provided tools with git makes finding bugs easy provided the bug is
+reproducible.
+
+Steps to do it:
+- start using git for the kernel source
+- read the man page for git-bisect
+- have fun
+
+Finding it the old way
+----------------------
+
+[Sat Mar 2 10:32:33 PST 1996 KERNEL_BUG-HOWTO lm@sgi.com (Larry McVoy)]
+
+This is how to track down a bug if you know nothing about kernel hacking.
+It's a brute force approach but it works pretty well.
+
+You need:
+
+ . A reproducible bug - it has to happen predictably (sorry)
+ . All the kernel tar files from a revision that worked to the
+ revision that doesn't
+
+You will then do:
+
+ . Rebuild a revision that you believe works, install, and verify that.
+ . Do a binary search over the kernels to figure out which one
+ introduced the bug. I.e., suppose 1.3.28 didn't have the bug, but
+ you know that 1.3.69 does. Pick a kernel in the middle and build
+ that, like 1.3.50. Build & test; if it works, pick the mid point
+ between .50 and .69, else the mid point between .28 and .50.
+ . You'll narrow it down to the kernel that introduced the bug. You
+ can probably do better than this but it gets tricky.
+
+ . Narrow it down to a subdirectory
+
+ - Copy kernel that works into "test". Let's say that 3.62 works,
+ but 3.63 doesn't. So you diff -r those two kernels and come
+ up with a list of directories that changed. For each of those
+ directories:
+
+ Copy the non-working directory next to the working directory
+ as "dir.63".
+ One directory at time, try moving the working directory to
+ "dir.62" and mv dir.63 dir"time, try
+
+ mv dir dir.62
+ mv dir.63 dir
+ find dir -name '*.[oa]' -print | xargs rm -f
+
+ And then rebuild and retest. Assuming that all related
+ changes were contained in the sub directory, this should
+ isolate the change to a directory.
+
+ Problems: changes in header files may have occurred; I've
+ found in my case that they were self explanatory - you may
+ or may not want to give up when that happens.
+
+ . Narrow it down to a file
+
+ - You can apply the same technique to each file in the directory,
+ hoping that the changes in that file are self contained.
+
+ . Narrow it down to a routine
+
+ - You can take the old file and the new file and manually create
+ a merged file that has
+
+ #ifdef VER62
+ routine()
+ {
+ ...
+ }
+ #else
+ routine()
+ {
+ ...
+ }
+ #endif
+
+ And then walk through that file, one routine at a time and
+ prefix it with
+
+ #define VER62
+ /* both routines here */
+ #undef VER62
+
+ Then recompile, retest, move the ifdefs until you find the one
+ that makes the difference.
+
+Finally, you take all the info that you have, kernel revisions, bug
+description, the extent to which you have narrowed it down, and pass
+that off to whomever you believe is the maintainer of that section.
+A post to linux.dev.kernel isn't such a bad idea if you've done some
+work to narrow it down.
+
+If you get it down to a routine, you'll probably get a fix in 24 hours.
+
+My apologies to Linus and the other kernel hackers for describing this
+brute force approach, it's hardly what a kernel hacker would do. However,
+it does work and it lets non-hackers help fix bugs. And it is cool
+because Linux snapshots will let you do this - something that you can't
+do with vendor supplied releases.
+
+Fixing the bug
+==============
+
+Nobody is going to tell you how to fix bugs. Seriously. You need to work it
+out. But below are some hints on how to use the tools.
+
+To debug a kernel, use objdump and look for the hex offset from the crash
+output to find the valid line of code/assembler. Without debug symbols, you
+will see the assembler code for the routine shown, but if your kernel has
+debug symbols the C code will also be available. (Debug symbols can be enabled
+in the kernel hacking menu of the menu configuration.) For example:
+
+ objdump -r -S -l --disassemble net/dccp/ipv4.o
+
+NB.: you need to be at the top level of the kernel tree for this to pick up
+your C files.
+
+If you don't have access to the code you can also debug on some crash dumps
+e.g. crash dump output as shown by Dave Miller.
+
+> EIP is at ip_queue_xmit+0x14/0x4c0
+> ...
+> Code: 44 24 04 e8 6f 05 00 00 e9 e8 fe ff ff 8d 76 00 8d bc 27 00 00
+> 00 00 55 57 56 53 81 ec bc 00 00 00 8b ac 24 d0 00 00 00 8b 5d 08
+> <8b> 83 3c 01 00 00 89 44 24 14 8b 45 28 85 c0 89 44 24 18 0f 85
+>
+> Put the bytes into a "foo.s" file like this:
+>
+> .text
+> .globl foo
+> foo:
+> .byte .... /* bytes from Code: part of OOPS dump */
+>
+> Compile it with "gcc -c -o foo.o foo.s" then look at the output of
+> "objdump --disassemble foo.o".
+>
+> Output:
+>
+> ip_queue_xmit:
+> push %ebp
+> push %edi
+> push %esi
+> push %ebx
+> sub $0xbc, %esp
+> mov 0xd0(%esp), %ebp ! %ebp = arg0 (skb)
+> mov 0x8(%ebp), %ebx ! %ebx = skb->sk
+> mov 0x13c(%ebx), %eax ! %eax = inet_sk(sk)->opt
+
+In addition, you can use GDB to figure out the exact file and line
+number of the OOPS from the vmlinux file. If you have
+CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO enabled, you can simply copy the EIP value from the
+OOPS:
+
+ EIP: 0060:[<c021e50e>] Not tainted VLI
+
+And use GDB to translate that to human-readable form:
+
+ gdb vmlinux
+ (gdb) l *0xc021e50e
+
+If you don't have CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO enabled, you use the function
+offset from the OOPS:
+
+ EIP is at vt_ioctl+0xda8/0x1482
+
+And recompile the kernel with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO enabled:
+
+ make vmlinux
+ gdb vmlinux
+ (gdb) p vt_ioctl
+ (gdb) l *(0x<address of vt_ioctl> + 0xda8)
+or, as one command
+ (gdb) l *(vt_ioctl + 0xda8)
+
+If you have a call trace, such as :-
+>Call Trace:
+> [<ffffffff8802c8e9>] :jbd:log_wait_commit+0xa3/0xf5
+> [<ffffffff810482d9>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
+> [<ffffffff8802770b>] :jbd:journal_stop+0x1be/0x1ee
+> ...
+this shows the problem in the :jbd: module. You can load that module in gdb
+and list the relevant code.
+ gdb fs/jbd/jbd.ko
+ (gdb) p log_wait_commit
+ (gdb) l *(0x<address> + 0xa3)
+or
+ (gdb) l *(log_wait_commit + 0xa3)
+
+
+Another very useful option of the Kernel Hacking section in menuconfig is
+Debug memory allocations. This will help you see whether data has been
+initialised and not set before use etc. To see the values that get assigned
+with this look at mm/slab.c and search for POISON_INUSE. When using this an
+Oops will often show the poisoned data instead of zero which is the default.
+
+Once you have worked out a fix please submit it upstream. After all open
+source is about sharing what you do and don't you want to be recognised for
+your genius?
+
+Please do read Documentation/SubmittingPatches though to help your code get
+accepted.