diff options
author | André Fabian Silva Delgado <emulatorman@parabola.nu> | 2015-08-05 17:04:01 -0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | André Fabian Silva Delgado <emulatorman@parabola.nu> | 2015-08-05 17:04:01 -0300 |
commit | 57f0f512b273f60d52568b8c6b77e17f5636edc0 (patch) | |
tree | 5e910f0e82173f4ef4f51111366a3f1299037a7b /Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.txt |
Initial import
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.txt | 86 |
1 files changed, 86 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000..bfeabb843 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.txt @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +GPIO-based I2C Arbitration Using a Challenge & Response Mechanism +================================================================= +This uses GPIO lines and a challenge & response mechanism to arbitrate who is +the master of an I2C bus in a multimaster situation. + +In many cases using GPIOs to arbitrate is not needed and a design can use +the standard I2C multi-master rules. Using GPIOs is generally useful in +the case where there is a device on the bus that has errata and/or bugs +that makes standard multimaster mode not feasible. + +Note that this scheme works well enough but has some downsides: +* It is nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) +* Having two masters on a bus in general makes it relatively hard to debug + problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by one master, another, or + some device on the bus). + + +Algorithm: + +All masters on the bus have a 'bus claim' line which is an output that the +others can see. These are all active low with pull-ups enabled. We'll +describe these lines as: + +- OUR_CLAIM: output from us signaling to other hosts that we want the bus +- THEIR_CLAIMS: output from others signaling that they want the bus + +The basic algorithm is to assert your line when you want the bus, then make +sure that the other side doesn't want it also. A detailed explanation is best +done with an example. + +Let's say we want to claim the bus. We: +1. Assert OUR_CLAIM. +2. Waits a little bit for the other sides to notice (slew time, say 10 + microseconds). +3. Check THEIR_CLAIMS. If none are asserted then the we have the bus and we are + done. +4. Otherwise, wait for a few milliseconds and see if THEIR_CLAIMS are released. +5. If not, back off, release the claim and wait for a few more milliseconds. +6. Go back to 1 (until retry time has expired). + + +Required properties: +- compatible: i2c-arb-gpio-challenge +- our-claim-gpio: The GPIO that we use to claim the bus. +- their-claim-gpios: The GPIOs that the other sides use to claim the bus. + Note that some implementations may only support a single other master. +- Standard I2C mux properties. See mux.txt in this directory. +- Single I2C child bus node at reg 0. See mux.txt in this directory. + +Optional properties: +- slew-delay-us: microseconds to wait for a GPIO to go high. Default is 10 us. +- wait-retry-us: we'll attempt another claim after this many microseconds. + Default is 3000 us. +- wait-free-us: we'll give up after this many microseconds. Default is 50000 us. + + +Example: + i2c@12CA0000 { + compatible = "acme,some-i2c-device"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + }; + + i2c-arbitrator { + compatible = "i2c-arb-gpio-challenge"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + i2c-parent = <&{/i2c@12CA0000}>; + + our-claim-gpio = <&gpf0 3 1>; + their-claim-gpios = <&gpe0 4 1>; + slew-delay-us = <10>; + wait-retry-us = <3000>; + wait-free-us = <50000>; + + i2c@0 { + reg = <0>; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + i2c@52 { + // Normal I2C device + }; + }; + }; |