diff options
author | André Fabian Silva Delgado <emulatorman@parabola.nu> | 2015-08-05 17:04:01 -0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | André Fabian Silva Delgado <emulatorman@parabola.nu> | 2015-08-05 17:04:01 -0300 |
commit | 57f0f512b273f60d52568b8c6b77e17f5636edc0 (patch) | |
tree | 5e910f0e82173f4ef4f51111366a3f1299037a7b /Documentation/namespaces/compatibility-list.txt |
Initial import
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/namespaces/compatibility-list.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/namespaces/compatibility-list.txt | 39 |
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/namespaces/compatibility-list.txt b/Documentation/namespaces/compatibility-list.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000..defc5589b --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/namespaces/compatibility-list.txt @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ + Namespaces compatibility list + +This document contains the information about the problems user +may have when creating tasks living in different namespaces. + +Here's the summary. This matrix shows the known problems, that +occur when tasks share some namespace (the columns) while living +in different other namespaces (the rows): + + UTS IPC VFS PID User Net +UTS X +IPC X 1 +VFS X +PID 1 1 X +User 2 2 X +Net X + +1. Both the IPC and the PID namespaces provide IDs to address + object inside the kernel. E.g. semaphore with IPCID or + process group with pid. + + In both cases, tasks shouldn't try exposing this ID to some + other task living in a different namespace via a shared filesystem + or IPC shmem/message. The fact is that this ID is only valid + within the namespace it was obtained in and may refer to some + other object in another namespace. + +2. Intentionally, two equal user IDs in different user namespaces + should not be equal from the VFS point of view. In other + words, user 10 in one user namespace shouldn't have the same + access permissions to files, belonging to user 10 in another + namespace. + + The same is true for the IPC namespaces being shared - two users + from different user namespaces should not access the same IPC objects + even having equal UIDs. + + But currently this is not so. + |