Linux-libre 4.8.2-gnupck-4.8.2-gnu

1 files changed, 83 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 10011db7b..c22b37fb8 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -211,6 +211,82 @@ repeat:
 }
 
 /*
+ * Note that if this function returns a valid task_struct pointer (!NULL)
+ * task->usage must remain >0 for the duration of the RCU critical section.
+ */
+struct task_struct *task_rcu_dereference(struct task_struct **ptask)
+{
+	struct sighand_struct *sighand;
+	struct task_struct *task;
+
+	/*
+	 * We need to verify that release_task() was not called and thus
+	 * delayed_put_task_struct() can't run and drop the last reference
+	 * before rcu_read_unlock(). We check task->sighand != NULL,
+	 * but we can read the already freed and reused memory.
+	 */
+retry:
+	task = rcu_dereference(*ptask);
+	if (!task)
+		return NULL;
+
+	probe_kernel_address(&task->sighand, sighand);
+
+	/*
+	 * Pairs with atomic_dec_and_test() in put_task_struct(). If this task
+	 * was already freed we can not miss the preceding update of this
+	 * pointer.
+	 */
+	smp_rmb();
+	if (unlikely(task != READ_ONCE(*ptask)))
+		goto retry;
+
+	/*
+	 * We've re-checked that "task == *ptask", now we have two different
+	 * cases:
+	 *
+	 * 1. This is actually the same task/task_struct. In this case
+	 *    sighand != NULL tells us it is still alive.
+	 *
+	 * 2. This is another task which got the same memory for task_struct.
+	 *    We can't know this of course, and we can not trust
+	 *    sighand != NULL.
+	 *
+	 *    In this case we actually return a random value, but this is
+	 *    correct.
+	 *
+	 *    If we return NULL - we can pretend that we actually noticed that
+	 *    *ptask was updated when the previous task has exited. Or pretend
+	 *    that probe_slab_address(&sighand) reads NULL.
+	 *
+	 *    If we return the new task (because sighand is not NULL for any
+	 *    reason) - this is fine too. This (new) task can't go away before
+	 *    another gp pass.
+	 *
+	 *    And note: We could even eliminate the false positive if re-read
+	 *    task->sighand once again to avoid the falsely NULL. But this case
+	 *    is very unlikely so we don't care.
+	 */
+	if (!sighand)
+		return NULL;
+
+	return task;
+}
+
+struct task_struct *try_get_task_struct(struct task_struct **ptask)
+{
+	struct task_struct *task;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	task = task_rcu_dereference(ptask);
+	if (task)
+		get_task_struct(task);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	return task;
+}
+
+/*
  * Determine if a process group is "orphaned", according to the POSIX
  * definition in 2.2.2.52.  Orphaned process groups are not to be affected
  * by terminal-generated stop signals.  Newly orphaned process groups are
@@ -639,7 +715,7 @@ static void check_stack_usage(void)
 
 	spin_lock(&low_water_lock);
 	if (free < lowest_to_date) {
-		pr_warn("%s (%d) used greatest stack depth: %lu bytes left\n",
+		pr_info("%s (%d) used greatest stack depth: %lu bytes left\n",
 			current->comm, task_pid_nr(current), free);
 		lowest_to_date = free;
 	}
@@ -700,10 +776,14 @@ void do_exit(long code)
 
 	exit_signals(tsk);  /* sets PF_EXITING */
 	/*
-	 * tsk->flags are checked in the futex code to protect against
-	 * an exiting task cleaning up the robust pi futexes.
+	 * Ensure that all new tsk->pi_lock acquisitions must observe
+	 * PF_EXITING. Serializes against futex.c:attach_to_pi_owner().
 	 */
 	smp_mb();
+	/*
+	 * Ensure that we must observe the pi_state in exit_mm() ->
+	 * mm_release() -> exit_pi_state_list().
+	 */
 	raw_spin_unlock_wait(&tsk->pi_lock);
 
 	if (unlikely(in_atomic())) {