Linux-libre 4.4-gnupck-4.4-gnu

11 files changed, 244 insertions, 92 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 4e49cc4c9..60ace5661 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
  * Started by Ingo Molnar:
  *
  *  Copyright (C) 2006,2007 Red Hat, Inc., Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
- *  Copyright (C) 2007 Red Hat, Inc., Peter Zijlstra <pzijlstr@redhat.com>
+ *  Copyright (C) 2007 Red Hat, Inc., Peter Zijlstra
  *
  * this code maps all the lock dependencies as they occur in a live kernel
  * and will warn about the following classes of locking bugs:
@@ -2738,7 +2738,7 @@ static void __lockdep_trace_alloc(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned long flags)
 		return;
 
 	/* no reclaim without waiting on it */
-	if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT))
+	if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM))
 		return;
 
 	/* this guy won't enter reclaim */
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
index d83d798be..dbb61a302 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
  * Started by Ingo Molnar:
  *
  *  Copyright (C) 2006,2007 Red Hat, Inc., Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
- *  Copyright (C) 2007 Red Hat, Inc., Peter Zijlstra <pzijlstr@redhat.com>
+ *  Copyright (C) 2007 Red Hat, Inc., Peter Zijlstra
  *
  * Code for /proc/lockdep and /proc/lockdep_stats:
  *
diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
index 32244186f..8ef1919d6 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
@@ -17,12 +17,14 @@
  *
  * Copyright (C) IBM Corporation, 2014
  *
- * Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
+ * Authors: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
+ *          Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
  *	Based on kernel/rcu/torture.c.
  */
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/kthread.h>
+#include <linux/sched/rt.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/rwlock.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
@@ -34,6 +36,7 @@
 #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/percpu-rwsem.h>
 #include <linux/torture.h>
 
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
@@ -91,11 +94,13 @@ struct lock_torture_ops {
 	void (*init)(void);
 	int (*writelock)(void);
 	void (*write_delay)(struct torture_random_state *trsp);
+	void (*task_boost)(struct torture_random_state *trsp);
 	void (*writeunlock)(void);
 	int (*readlock)(void);
 	void (*read_delay)(struct torture_random_state *trsp);
 	void (*readunlock)(void);
-	unsigned long flags;
+
+	unsigned long flags; /* for irq spinlocks */
 	const char *name;
 };
 
@@ -139,9 +144,15 @@ static void torture_lock_busted_write_unlock(void)
 	  /* BUGGY, do not use in real life!!! */
 }
 
+static void torture_boost_dummy(struct torture_random_state *trsp)
+{
+	/* Only rtmutexes care about priority */
+}
+
 static struct lock_torture_ops lock_busted_ops = {
 	.writelock	= torture_lock_busted_write_lock,
 	.write_delay	= torture_lock_busted_write_delay,
+	.task_boost     = torture_boost_dummy,
 	.writeunlock	= torture_lock_busted_write_unlock,
 	.readlock       = NULL,
 	.read_delay     = NULL,
@@ -185,6 +196,7 @@ static void torture_spin_lock_write_unlock(void) __releases(torture_spinlock)
 static struct lock_torture_ops spin_lock_ops = {
 	.writelock	= torture_spin_lock_write_lock,
 	.write_delay	= torture_spin_lock_write_delay,
+	.task_boost     = torture_boost_dummy,
 	.writeunlock	= torture_spin_lock_write_unlock,
 	.readlock       = NULL,
 	.read_delay     = NULL,
@@ -211,6 +223,7 @@ __releases(torture_spinlock)
 static struct lock_torture_ops spin_lock_irq_ops = {
 	.writelock	= torture_spin_lock_write_lock_irq,
 	.write_delay	= torture_spin_lock_write_delay,
+	.task_boost     = torture_boost_dummy,
 	.writeunlock	= torture_lock_spin_write_unlock_irq,
 	.readlock       = NULL,
 	.read_delay     = NULL,
@@ -275,6 +288,7 @@ static void torture_rwlock_read_unlock(void) __releases(torture_rwlock)
 static struct lock_torture_ops rw_lock_ops = {
 	.writelock	= torture_rwlock_write_lock,
 	.write_delay	= torture_rwlock_write_delay,
+	.task_boost     = torture_boost_dummy,
 	.writeunlock	= torture_rwlock_write_unlock,
 	.readlock       = torture_rwlock_read_lock,
 	.read_delay     = torture_rwlock_read_delay,
@@ -315,6 +329,7 @@ __releases(torture_rwlock)
 static struct lock_torture_ops rw_lock_irq_ops = {
 	.writelock	= torture_rwlock_write_lock_irq,
 	.write_delay	= torture_rwlock_write_delay,
+	.task_boost     = torture_boost_dummy,
 	.writeunlock	= torture_rwlock_write_unlock_irq,
 	.readlock       = torture_rwlock_read_lock_irq,
 	.read_delay     = torture_rwlock_read_delay,
@@ -354,6 +369,7 @@ static void torture_mutex_unlock(void) __releases(torture_mutex)
 static struct lock_torture_ops mutex_lock_ops = {
 	.writelock	= torture_mutex_lock,
 	.write_delay	= torture_mutex_delay,
+	.task_boost     = torture_boost_dummy,
 	.writeunlock	= torture_mutex_unlock,
 	.readlock       = NULL,
 	.read_delay     = NULL,
@@ -361,6 +377,90 @@ static struct lock_torture_ops mutex_lock_ops = {
 	.name		= "mutex_lock"
 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
+static DEFINE_RT_MUTEX(torture_rtmutex);
+
+static int torture_rtmutex_lock(void) __acquires(torture_rtmutex)
+{
+	rt_mutex_lock(&torture_rtmutex);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void torture_rtmutex_boost(struct torture_random_state *trsp)
+{
+	int policy;
+	struct sched_param param;
+	const unsigned int factor = 50000; /* yes, quite arbitrary */
+
+	if (!rt_task(current)) {
+		/*
+		 * (1) Boost priority once every ~50k operations. When the
+		 * task tries to take the lock, the rtmutex it will account
+		 * for the new priority, and do any corresponding pi-dance.
+		 */
+		if (!(torture_random(trsp) %
+		      (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * factor))) {
+			policy = SCHED_FIFO;
+			param.sched_priority = MAX_RT_PRIO - 1;
+		} else /* common case, do nothing */
+			return;
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * The task will remain boosted for another ~500k operations,
+		 * then restored back to its original prio, and so forth.
+		 *
+		 * When @trsp is nil, we want to force-reset the task for
+		 * stopping the kthread.
+		 */
+		if (!trsp || !(torture_random(trsp) %
+			       (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * factor * 2))) {
+			policy = SCHED_NORMAL;
+			param.sched_priority = 0;
+		} else /* common case, do nothing */
+			return;
+	}
+
+	sched_setscheduler_nocheck(current, policy, &param);
+}
+
+static void torture_rtmutex_delay(struct torture_random_state *trsp)
+{
+	const unsigned long shortdelay_us = 2;
+	const unsigned long longdelay_ms = 100;
+
+	/*
+	 * We want a short delay mostly to emulate likely code, and
+	 * we want a long delay occasionally to force massive contention.
+	 */
+	if (!(torture_random(trsp) %
+	      (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * 2000 * longdelay_ms)))
+		mdelay(longdelay_ms);
+	if (!(torture_random(trsp) %
+	      (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * 2 * shortdelay_us)))
+		udelay(shortdelay_us);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
+	if (!(torture_random(trsp) % (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * 20000)))
+		preempt_schedule();  /* Allow test to be preempted. */
+#endif
+}
+
+static void torture_rtmutex_unlock(void) __releases(torture_rtmutex)
+{
+	rt_mutex_unlock(&torture_rtmutex);
+}
+
+static struct lock_torture_ops rtmutex_lock_ops = {
+	.writelock	= torture_rtmutex_lock,
+	.write_delay	= torture_rtmutex_delay,
+	.task_boost     = torture_rtmutex_boost,
+	.writeunlock	= torture_rtmutex_unlock,
+	.readlock       = NULL,
+	.read_delay     = NULL,
+	.readunlock     = NULL,
+	.name		= "rtmutex_lock"
+};
+#endif
+
 static DECLARE_RWSEM(torture_rwsem);
 static int torture_rwsem_down_write(void) __acquires(torture_rwsem)
 {
@@ -419,6 +519,7 @@ static void torture_rwsem_up_read(void) __releases(torture_rwsem)
 static struct lock_torture_ops rwsem_lock_ops = {
 	.writelock	= torture_rwsem_down_write,
 	.write_delay	= torture_rwsem_write_delay,
+	.task_boost     = torture_boost_dummy,
 	.writeunlock	= torture_rwsem_up_write,
 	.readlock       = torture_rwsem_down_read,
 	.read_delay     = torture_rwsem_read_delay,
@@ -426,6 +527,48 @@ static struct lock_torture_ops rwsem_lock_ops = {
 	.name		= "rwsem_lock"
 };
 
+#include <linux/percpu-rwsem.h>
+static struct percpu_rw_semaphore pcpu_rwsem;
+
+void torture_percpu_rwsem_init(void)
+{
+	BUG_ON(percpu_init_rwsem(&pcpu_rwsem));
+}
+
+static int torture_percpu_rwsem_down_write(void) __acquires(pcpu_rwsem)
+{
+	percpu_down_write(&pcpu_rwsem);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void torture_percpu_rwsem_up_write(void) __releases(pcpu_rwsem)
+{
+	percpu_up_write(&pcpu_rwsem);
+}
+
+static int torture_percpu_rwsem_down_read(void) __acquires(pcpu_rwsem)
+{
+	percpu_down_read(&pcpu_rwsem);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void torture_percpu_rwsem_up_read(void) __releases(pcpu_rwsem)
+{
+	percpu_up_read(&pcpu_rwsem);
+}
+
+static struct lock_torture_ops percpu_rwsem_lock_ops = {
+	.init		= torture_percpu_rwsem_init,
+	.writelock	= torture_percpu_rwsem_down_write,
+	.write_delay	= torture_rwsem_write_delay,
+	.task_boost     = torture_boost_dummy,
+	.writeunlock	= torture_percpu_rwsem_up_write,
+	.readlock       = torture_percpu_rwsem_down_read,
+	.read_delay     = torture_rwsem_read_delay,
+	.readunlock     = torture_percpu_rwsem_up_read,
+	.name		= "percpu_rwsem_lock"
+};
+
 /*
  * Lock torture writer kthread.  Repeatedly acquires and releases
  * the lock, checking for duplicate acquisitions.
@@ -442,6 +585,7 @@ static int lock_torture_writer(void *arg)
 		if ((torture_random(&rand) & 0xfffff) == 0)
 			schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
 
+		cxt.cur_ops->task_boost(&rand);
 		cxt.cur_ops->writelock();
 		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lock_is_write_held))
 			lwsp->n_lock_fail++;
@@ -456,6 +600,8 @@ static int lock_torture_writer(void *arg)
 
 		stutter_wait("lock_torture_writer");
 	} while (!torture_must_stop());
+
+	cxt.cur_ops->task_boost(NULL); /* reset prio */
 	torture_kthread_stopping("lock_torture_writer");
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -642,7 +788,11 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void)
 		&spin_lock_ops, &spin_lock_irq_ops,
 		&rw_lock_ops, &rw_lock_irq_ops,
 		&mutex_lock_ops,
+#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
+		&rtmutex_lock_ops,
+#endif
 		&rwsem_lock_ops,
+		&percpu_rwsem_lock_ops,
 	};
 
 	if (!torture_init_begin(torture_type, verbose, &torture_runnable))
@@ -661,11 +811,11 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void)
 		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(torture_ops); i++)
 			pr_alert(" %s", torture_ops[i]->name);
 		pr_alert("\n");
-		torture_init_end();
-		return -EINVAL;
+		firsterr = -EINVAL;
+		goto unwind;
 	}
 	if (cxt.cur_ops->init)
-		cxt.cur_ops->init(); /* no "goto unwind" prior to this point!!! */
+		cxt.cur_ops->init();
 
 	if (nwriters_stress >= 0)
 		cxt.nrealwriters_stress = nwriters_stress;
@@ -676,6 +826,10 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void)
 	if (strncmp(torture_type, "mutex", 5) == 0)
 		cxt.debug_lock = true;
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
+	if (strncmp(torture_type, "rtmutex", 7) == 0)
+		cxt.debug_lock = true;
+#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
 	if ((strncmp(torture_type, "spin", 4) == 0) ||
 	    (strncmp(torture_type, "rw_lock", 7) == 0))
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
index fd91aaa45..5b9102a47 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
 	node->locked = 0;
 	node->next   = NULL;
 
-	prev = xchg(lock, node);
+	prev = xchg_acquire(lock, node);
 	if (likely(prev == NULL)) {
 		/*
 		 * Lock acquired, don't need to set node->locked to 1. Threads
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ void mcs_spin_unlock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
 		/*
 		 * Release the lock by setting it to NULL
 		 */
-		if (likely(cmpxchg(lock, node, NULL) == node))
+		if (likely(cmpxchg_release(lock, node, NULL) == node))
 			return;
 		/* Wait until the next pointer is set */
 		while (!(next = READ_ONCE(node->next)))
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index 4cccea6b8..0551c219c 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock)
 static inline bool mutex_try_to_acquire(struct mutex *lock)
 {
 	return !mutex_is_locked(lock) &&
-		(atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->count, 1, 0) == 1);
+		(atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->count, 1, 0) == 1);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -529,7 +529,8 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
 	 * Once more, try to acquire the lock. Only try-lock the mutex if
 	 * it is unlocked to reduce unnecessary xchg() operations.
 	 */
-	if (!mutex_is_locked(lock) && (atomic_xchg(&lock->count, 0) == 1))
+	if (!mutex_is_locked(lock) &&
+	    (atomic_xchg_acquire(&lock->count, 0) == 1))
 		goto skip_wait;
 
 	debug_mutex_lock_common(lock, &waiter);
@@ -553,7 +554,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
 		 * non-negative in order to avoid unnecessary xchg operations:
 		 */
 		if (atomic_read(&lock->count) >= 0 &&
-		    (atomic_xchg(&lock->count, -1) == 1))
+		    (atomic_xchg_acquire(&lock->count, -1) == 1))
 			break;
 
 		/*
@@ -867,7 +868,7 @@ static inline int __mutex_trylock_slowpath(atomic_t *lock_count)
 
 	spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
 
-	prev = atomic_xchg(&lock->count, -1);
+	prev = atomic_xchg_acquire(&lock->count, -1);
 	if (likely(prev == 1)) {
 		mutex_set_owner(lock);
 		mutex_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
diff --git a/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c b/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
index dc85ee23a..05a37857a 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock,
 
 	for (;;) {
 		if (atomic_read(&lock->tail) == curr &&
-		    atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->tail, curr, old) == curr) {
+		    atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->tail, curr, old) == curr) {
 			/*
 			 * We were the last queued, we moved @lock back. @prev
 			 * will now observe @lock and will complete its
@@ -92,6 +92,12 @@ bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
 	node->next = NULL;
 	node->cpu = curr;
 
+	/*
+	 * We need both ACQUIRE (pairs with corresponding RELEASE in
+	 * unlock() uncontended, or fastpath) and RELEASE (to publish
+	 * the node fields we just initialised) semantics when updating
+	 * the lock tail.
+	 */
 	old = atomic_xchg(&lock->tail, curr);
 	if (old == OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL)
 		return true;
@@ -184,7 +190,8 @@ void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
 	/*
 	 * Fast path for the uncontended case.
 	 */
-	if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->tail, curr, OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL) == curr))
+	if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg_release(&lock->tail, curr,
+					  OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL) == curr))
 		return;
 
 	/*
diff --git a/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c
index f32567254..f231e0bb3 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c
@@ -17,50 +17,43 @@ int __percpu_init_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw,
 
 	/* ->rw_sem represents the whole percpu_rw_semaphore for lockdep */
 	__init_rwsem(&brw->rw_sem, name, rwsem_key);
-	atomic_set(&brw->write_ctr, 0);
+	rcu_sync_init(&brw->rss, RCU_SCHED_SYNC);
 	atomic_set(&brw->slow_read_ctr, 0);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&brw->write_waitq);
 	return 0;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__percpu_init_rwsem);
 
 void percpu_free_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
 {
+	/*
+	 * XXX: temporary kludge. The error path in alloc_super()
+	 * assumes that percpu_free_rwsem() is safe after kzalloc().
+	 */
+	if (!brw->fast_read_ctr)
+		return;
+
+	rcu_sync_dtor(&brw->rss);
 	free_percpu(brw->fast_read_ctr);
 	brw->fast_read_ctr = NULL; /* catch use after free bugs */
 }
 
 /*
- * This is the fast-path for down_read/up_read, it only needs to ensure
- * there is no pending writer (atomic_read(write_ctr) == 0) and inc/dec the
- * fast per-cpu counter. The writer uses synchronize_sched_expedited() to
- * serialize with the preempt-disabled section below.
- *
- * The nontrivial part is that we should guarantee acquire/release semantics
- * in case when
- *
- *	R_W: down_write() comes after up_read(), the writer should see all
- *	     changes done by the reader
- * or
- *	W_R: down_read() comes after up_write(), the reader should see all
- *	     changes done by the writer
+ * This is the fast-path for down_read/up_read. If it succeeds we rely
+ * on the barriers provided by rcu_sync_enter/exit; see the comments in
+ * percpu_down_write() and percpu_up_write().
  *
  * If this helper fails the callers rely on the normal rw_semaphore and
  * atomic_dec_and_test(), so in this case we have the necessary barriers.
- *
- * But if it succeeds we do not have any barriers, atomic_read(write_ctr) or
- * __this_cpu_add() below can be reordered with any LOAD/STORE done by the
- * reader inside the critical section. See the comments in down_write and
- * up_write below.
  */
 static bool update_fast_ctr(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw, unsigned int val)
 {
-	bool success = false;
+	bool success;
 
 	preempt_disable();
-	if (likely(!atomic_read(&brw->write_ctr))) {
+	success = rcu_sync_is_idle(&brw->rss);
+	if (likely(success))
 		__this_cpu_add(*brw->fast_read_ctr, val);
-		success = true;
-	}
 	preempt_enable();
 
 	return success;
@@ -77,16 +70,17 @@ static bool update_fast_ctr(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw, unsigned int val)
 void percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
 {
 	might_sleep();
-	if (likely(update_fast_ctr(brw, +1))) {
-		rwsem_acquire_read(&brw->rw_sem.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
+	rwsem_acquire_read(&brw->rw_sem.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
+
+	if (likely(update_fast_ctr(brw, +1)))
 		return;
-	}
 
-	down_read(&brw->rw_sem);
+	/* Avoid rwsem_acquire_read() and rwsem_release() */
+	__down_read(&brw->rw_sem);
 	atomic_inc(&brw->slow_read_ctr);
-	/* avoid up_read()->rwsem_release() */
 	__up_read(&brw->rw_sem);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_down_read);
 
 int percpu_down_read_trylock(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
 {
@@ -112,6 +106,7 @@ void percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
 	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&brw->slow_read_ctr))
 		wake_up_all(&brw->write_waitq);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_up_read);
 
 static int clear_fast_ctr(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
 {
@@ -126,33 +121,17 @@ static int clear_fast_ctr(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
 	return sum;
 }
 
-/*
- * A writer increments ->write_ctr to force the readers to switch to the
- * slow mode, note the atomic_read() check in update_fast_ctr().
- *
- * After that the readers can only inc/dec the slow ->slow_read_ctr counter,
- * ->fast_read_ctr is stable. Once the writer moves its sum into the slow
- * counter it represents the number of active readers.
- *
- * Finally the writer takes ->rw_sem for writing and blocks the new readers,
- * then waits until the slow counter becomes zero.
- */
 void percpu_down_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
 {
-	/* tell update_fast_ctr() there is a pending writer */
-	atomic_inc(&brw->write_ctr);
 	/*
-	 * 1. Ensures that write_ctr != 0 is visible to any down_read/up_read
-	 *    so that update_fast_ctr() can't succeed.
-	 *
-	 * 2. Ensures we see the result of every previous this_cpu_add() in
-	 *    update_fast_ctr().
+	 * Make rcu_sync_is_idle() == F and thus disable the fast-path in
+	 * percpu_down_read() and percpu_up_read(), and wait for gp pass.
 	 *
-	 * 3. Ensures that if any reader has exited its critical section via
-	 *    fast-path, it executes a full memory barrier before we return.
-	 *    See R_W case in the comment above update_fast_ctr().
+	 * The latter synchronises us with the preceding readers which used
+	 * the fast-past, so we can not miss the result of __this_cpu_add()
+	 * or anything else inside their criticial sections.
 	 */
-	synchronize_sched_expedited();
+	rcu_sync_enter(&brw->rss);
 
 	/* exclude other writers, and block the new readers completely */
 	down_write(&brw->rw_sem);
@@ -163,16 +142,17 @@ void percpu_down_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
 	/* wait for all readers to complete their percpu_up_read() */
 	wait_event(brw->write_waitq, !atomic_read(&brw->slow_read_ctr));
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_down_write);
 
 void percpu_up_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
 {
 	/* release the lock, but the readers can't use the fast-path */
 	up_write(&brw->rw_sem);
 	/*
-	 * Insert the barrier before the next fast-path in down_read,
-	 * see W_R case in the comment above update_fast_ctr().
+	 * Enable the fast-path in percpu_down_read() and percpu_up_read()
+	 * but only after another gp pass; this adds the necessary barrier
+	 * to ensure the reader can't miss the changes done by us.
 	 */
-	synchronize_sched_expedited();
-	/* the last writer unblocks update_fast_ctr() */
-	atomic_dec(&brw->write_ctr);
+	rcu_sync_exit(&brw->rss);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_up_write);
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
index f17a3e3b3..fec082338 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ void queued_read_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock, u32 cnts)
 	/*
 	 * Put the reader into the wait queue
 	 */
-	arch_spin_lock(&lock->lock);
+	arch_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
 
 	/*
 	 * The ACQUIRE semantics of the following spinning code ensure
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ void queued_read_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock, u32 cnts)
 	/*
 	 * Signal the next one in queue to become queue head
 	 */
-	arch_spin_unlock(&lock->lock);
+	arch_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_read_lock_slowpath);
 
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ void queued_write_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock)
 	u32 cnts;
 
 	/* Put the writer into the wait queue */
-	arch_spin_lock(&lock->lock);
+	arch_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
 
 	/* Try to acquire the lock directly if no reader is present */
 	if (!atomic_read(&lock->cnts) &&
@@ -144,6 +144,6 @@ void queued_write_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock)
 		cpu_relax_lowlatency();
 	}
 unlock:
-	arch_spin_unlock(&lock->lock);
+	arch_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_write_lock_slowpath);
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
index c8e6e9a59..f0450ff48 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
@@ -267,7 +267,6 @@ static void pv_wait_head(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
 		}
 
 		if (!lp) { /* ONCE */
-			WRITE_ONCE(pn->state, vcpu_hashed);
 			lp = pv_hash(lock, pn);
 
 			/*
@@ -275,11 +274,9 @@ static void pv_wait_head(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
 			 * when we observe _Q_SLOW_VAL in __pv_queued_spin_unlock()
 			 * we'll be sure to be able to observe our hash entry.
 			 *
-			 *   [S] pn->state
 			 *   [S] <hash>                 [Rmw] l->locked == _Q_SLOW_VAL
 			 *       MB                           RMB
 			 * [RmW] l->locked = _Q_SLOW_VAL  [L] <unhash>
-			 *                                [L] pn->state
 			 *
 			 * Matches the smp_rmb() in __pv_queued_spin_unlock().
 			 */
@@ -364,8 +361,7 @@ __visible void __pv_queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock)
 	 * vCPU is harmless other than the additional latency in completing
 	 * the unlock.
 	 */
-	if (READ_ONCE(node->state) == vcpu_hashed)
-		pv_kick(node->cpu);
+	pv_kick(node->cpu);
 }
 /*
  * Include the architecture specific callee-save thunk of the
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 7781d8012..8251e75dd 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -74,14 +74,23 @@ static void fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
  * set up.
  */
 #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
-# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg(l,c,n)	(cmpxchg(&l->owner, c, n) == c)
+# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_relaxed(l,c,n) (cmpxchg_relaxed(&l->owner, c, n) == c)
+# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(l,c,n) (cmpxchg_acquire(&l->owner, c, n) == c)
+# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(l,c,n) (cmpxchg_release(&l->owner, c, n) == c)
+
+/*
+ * Callers must hold the ->wait_lock -- which is the whole purpose as we force
+ * all future threads that attempt to [Rmw] the lock to the slowpath. As such
+ * relaxed semantics suffice.
+ */
 static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
 {
 	unsigned long owner, *p = (unsigned long *) &lock->owner;
 
 	do {
 		owner = *p;
-	} while (cmpxchg(p, owner, owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) != owner);
+	} while (cmpxchg_relaxed(p, owner,
+				 owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) != owner);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -121,11 +130,14 @@ static inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex *lock)
 	 *					lock(wait_lock);
 	 *					acquire(lock);
 	 */
-	return rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, owner, NULL);
+	return rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(lock, owner, NULL);
 }
 
 #else
-# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg(l,c,n)	(0)
+# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_relaxed(l,c,n)	(0)
+# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(l,c,n)	(0)
+# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(l,c,n)	(0)
+
 static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
 {
 	lock->owner = (struct task_struct *)
@@ -158,7 +170,8 @@ rt_mutex_waiter_less(struct rt_mutex_waiter *left,
 	 * then right waiter has a dl_prio() too.
 	 */
 	if (dl_prio(left->prio))
-		return (left->task->dl.deadline < right->task->dl.deadline);
+		return dl_time_before(left->task->dl.deadline,
+				      right->task->dl.deadline);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1321,7 +1334,7 @@ rt_mutex_fastlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
 				struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
 				enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk))
 {
-	if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) {
+	if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current))) {
 		rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current);
 		return 0;
 	} else
@@ -1337,7 +1350,7 @@ rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
 				      enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk))
 {
 	if (chwalk == RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK &&
-	    likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) {
+	    likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current))) {
 		rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current);
 		return 0;
 	} else
@@ -1348,7 +1361,7 @@ static inline int
 rt_mutex_fasttrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 		     int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock))
 {
-	if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) {
+	if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current))) {
 		rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current);
 		return 1;
 	}
@@ -1362,7 +1375,7 @@ rt_mutex_fastunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 {
 	WAKE_Q(wake_q);
 
-	if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, current, NULL))) {
+	if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(lock, current, NULL))) {
 		rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(current);
 
 	} else {
@@ -1484,7 +1497,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_unlock);
 bool __sched rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 				   struct wake_q_head *wqh)
 {
-	if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, current, NULL))) {
+	if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(lock, current, NULL))) {
 		rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(current);
 		return false;
 	}
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index 0f189714e..a4d4de05b 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(long count, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 	 * to reduce unnecessary expensive cmpxchg() operations.
 	 */
 	if (count == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS &&
-	    cmpxchg(&sem->count, RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS,
+	    cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS,
 		    RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS) == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS) {
 		if (!list_is_singular(&sem->wait_list))
 			rwsem_atomic_update(RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, sem);
@@ -285,7 +285,8 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock_unqueued(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 		if (!(count == 0 || count == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS))
 			return false;
 
-		old = cmpxchg(&sem->count, count, count + RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS);
+		old = cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, count,
+				      count + RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS);
 		if (old == count) {
 			rwsem_set_owner(sem);
 			return true;