summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/SubmittingPatches')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/SubmittingPatches14
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
index 27e7e5ede..fd89b04d3 100644
--- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
+++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
@@ -90,11 +90,11 @@ patch.
Make sure your patch does not include any extra files which do not
belong in a patch submission. Make sure to review your patch -after-
-generated it with diff(1), to ensure accuracy.
+generating it with diff(1), to ensure accuracy.
If your changes produce a lot of deltas, you need to split them into
individual patches which modify things in logical stages; see section
-#3. This will facilitate easier reviewing by other kernel developers,
+#3. This will facilitate review by other kernel developers,
very important if you want your patch accepted.
If you're using git, "git rebase -i" can help you with this process. If
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ You should always copy the appropriate subsystem maintainer(s) on any patch
to code that they maintain; look through the MAINTAINERS file and the
source code revision history to see who those maintainers are. The
script scripts/get_maintainer.pl can be very useful at this step. If you
-cannot find a maintainer for the subsystem your are working on, Andrew
+cannot find a maintainer for the subsystem you are working on, Andrew
Morton (akpm@linux-foundation.org) serves as a maintainer of last resort.
You should also normally choose at least one mailing list to receive a copy
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ sending him e-mail.
If you have a patch that fixes an exploitable security bug, send that patch
to security@kernel.org. For severe bugs, a short embargo may be considered
-to allow distrbutors to get the patch out to users; in such cases,
+to allow distributors to get the patch out to users; in such cases,
obviously, the patch should not be sent to any public lists.
Patches that fix a severe bug in a released kernel should be directed
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ on the changes you are submitting. It is important for a kernel
developer to be able to "quote" your changes, using standard e-mail
tools, so that they may comment on specific portions of your code.
-For this reason, all patches should be submitting e-mail "inline".
+For this reason, all patches should be submitted by e-mail "inline".
WARNING: Be wary of your editor's word-wrap corrupting your patch,
if you choose to cut-n-paste your patch.
@@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ interest on a single line; it should look something like:
git://jdelvare.pck.nerim.net/jdelvare-2.6 i2c-for-linus
- to get these changes:"
+ to get these changes:
A pull request should also include an overall message saying what will be
included in the request, a "git shortlog" listing of the patches
@@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ NO!!!! No more huge patch bombs to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org people!
<https://lkml.org/lkml/2005/7/11/336>
Kernel Documentation/CodingStyle:
- <http://users.sosdg.org/~qiyong/lxr/source/Documentation/CodingStyle>
+ <Documentation/CodingStyle>
Linus Torvalds's mail on the canonical patch format:
<http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/4/7/183>