diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/locking/rtmutex.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 1648 |
1 files changed, 1648 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b025295f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c @@ -0,0 +1,1648 @@ +/* + * RT-Mutexes: simple blocking mutual exclusion locks with PI support + * + * started by Ingo Molnar and Thomas Gleixner. + * + * Copyright (C) 2004-2006 Red Hat, Inc., Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> + * Copyright (C) 2005-2006 Timesys Corp., Thomas Gleixner <tglx@timesys.com> + * Copyright (C) 2005 Kihon Technologies Inc., Steven Rostedt + * Copyright (C) 2006 Esben Nielsen + * + * See Documentation/locking/rt-mutex-design.txt for details. + */ +#include <linux/spinlock.h> +#include <linux/export.h> +#include <linux/sched.h> +#include <linux/sched/rt.h> +#include <linux/sched/deadline.h> +#include <linux/timer.h> + +#include "rtmutex_common.h" + +/* + * lock->owner state tracking: + * + * lock->owner holds the task_struct pointer of the owner. Bit 0 + * is used to keep track of the "lock has waiters" state. + * + * owner bit0 + * NULL 0 lock is free (fast acquire possible) + * NULL 1 lock is free and has waiters and the top waiter + * is going to take the lock* + * taskpointer 0 lock is held (fast release possible) + * taskpointer 1 lock is held and has waiters** + * + * The fast atomic compare exchange based acquire and release is only + * possible when bit 0 of lock->owner is 0. + * + * (*) It also can be a transitional state when grabbing the lock + * with ->wait_lock is held. To prevent any fast path cmpxchg to the lock, + * we need to set the bit0 before looking at the lock, and the owner may be + * NULL in this small time, hence this can be a transitional state. + * + * (**) There is a small time when bit 0 is set but there are no + * waiters. This can happen when grabbing the lock in the slow path. + * To prevent a cmpxchg of the owner releasing the lock, we need to + * set this bit before looking at the lock. + */ + +static void +rt_mutex_set_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner) +{ + unsigned long val = (unsigned long)owner; + + if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) + val |= RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS; + + lock->owner = (struct task_struct *)val; +} + +static inline void clear_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) +{ + lock->owner = (struct task_struct *) + ((unsigned long)lock->owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS); +} + +static void fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) +{ + if (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) + clear_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); +} + +/* + * We can speed up the acquire/release, if the architecture + * supports cmpxchg and if there's no debugging state to be set up + */ +#if defined(__HAVE_ARCH_CMPXCHG) && !defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES) +# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg(l,c,n) (cmpxchg(&l->owner, c, n) == c) +static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) +{ + unsigned long owner, *p = (unsigned long *) &lock->owner; + + do { + owner = *p; + } while (cmpxchg(p, owner, owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) != owner); +} + +/* + * Safe fastpath aware unlock: + * 1) Clear the waiters bit + * 2) Drop lock->wait_lock + * 3) Try to unlock the lock with cmpxchg + */ +static inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex *lock) + __releases(lock->wait_lock) +{ + struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); + + clear_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + /* + * If a new waiter comes in between the unlock and the cmpxchg + * we have two situations: + * + * unlock(wait_lock); + * lock(wait_lock); + * cmpxchg(p, owner, 0) == owner + * mark_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); + * acquire(lock); + * or: + * + * unlock(wait_lock); + * lock(wait_lock); + * mark_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); + * + * cmpxchg(p, owner, 0) != owner + * enqueue_waiter(); + * unlock(wait_lock); + * lock(wait_lock); + * wake waiter(); + * unlock(wait_lock); + * lock(wait_lock); + * acquire(lock); + */ + return rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, owner, NULL); +} + +#else +# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg(l,c,n) (0) +static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) +{ + lock->owner = (struct task_struct *) + ((unsigned long)lock->owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS); +} + +/* + * Simple slow path only version: lock->owner is protected by lock->wait_lock. + */ +static inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex *lock) + __releases(lock->wait_lock) +{ + lock->owner = NULL; + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + return true; +} +#endif + +static inline int +rt_mutex_waiter_less(struct rt_mutex_waiter *left, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *right) +{ + if (left->prio < right->prio) + return 1; + + /* + * If both waiters have dl_prio(), we check the deadlines of the + * associated tasks. + * If left waiter has a dl_prio(), and we didn't return 1 above, + * then right waiter has a dl_prio() too. + */ + if (dl_prio(left->prio)) + return (left->task->dl.deadline < right->task->dl.deadline); + + return 0; +} + +static void +rt_mutex_enqueue(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) +{ + struct rb_node **link = &lock->waiters.rb_node; + struct rb_node *parent = NULL; + struct rt_mutex_waiter *entry; + int leftmost = 1; + + while (*link) { + parent = *link; + entry = rb_entry(parent, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree_entry); + if (rt_mutex_waiter_less(waiter, entry)) { + link = &parent->rb_left; + } else { + link = &parent->rb_right; + leftmost = 0; + } + } + + if (leftmost) + lock->waiters_leftmost = &waiter->tree_entry; + + rb_link_node(&waiter->tree_entry, parent, link); + rb_insert_color(&waiter->tree_entry, &lock->waiters); +} + +static void +rt_mutex_dequeue(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) +{ + if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry)) + return; + + if (lock->waiters_leftmost == &waiter->tree_entry) + lock->waiters_leftmost = rb_next(&waiter->tree_entry); + + rb_erase(&waiter->tree_entry, &lock->waiters); + RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry); +} + +static void +rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(struct task_struct *task, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) +{ + struct rb_node **link = &task->pi_waiters.rb_node; + struct rb_node *parent = NULL; + struct rt_mutex_waiter *entry; + int leftmost = 1; + + while (*link) { + parent = *link; + entry = rb_entry(parent, struct rt_mutex_waiter, pi_tree_entry); + if (rt_mutex_waiter_less(waiter, entry)) { + link = &parent->rb_left; + } else { + link = &parent->rb_right; + leftmost = 0; + } + } + + if (leftmost) + task->pi_waiters_leftmost = &waiter->pi_tree_entry; + + rb_link_node(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, parent, link); + rb_insert_color(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, &task->pi_waiters); +} + +static void +rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(struct task_struct *task, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) +{ + if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry)) + return; + + if (task->pi_waiters_leftmost == &waiter->pi_tree_entry) + task->pi_waiters_leftmost = rb_next(&waiter->pi_tree_entry); + + rb_erase(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, &task->pi_waiters); + RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry); +} + +/* + * Calculate task priority from the waiter tree priority + * + * Return task->normal_prio when the waiter tree is empty or when + * the waiter is not allowed to do priority boosting + */ +int rt_mutex_getprio(struct task_struct *task) +{ + if (likely(!task_has_pi_waiters(task))) + return task->normal_prio; + + return min(task_top_pi_waiter(task)->prio, + task->normal_prio); +} + +struct task_struct *rt_mutex_get_top_task(struct task_struct *task) +{ + if (likely(!task_has_pi_waiters(task))) + return NULL; + + return task_top_pi_waiter(task)->task; +} + +/* + * Called by sched_setscheduler() to get the priority which will be + * effective after the change. + */ +int rt_mutex_get_effective_prio(struct task_struct *task, int newprio) +{ + if (!task_has_pi_waiters(task)) + return newprio; + + if (task_top_pi_waiter(task)->task->prio <= newprio) + return task_top_pi_waiter(task)->task->prio; + return newprio; +} + +/* + * Adjust the priority of a task, after its pi_waiters got modified. + * + * This can be both boosting and unboosting. task->pi_lock must be held. + */ +static void __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task) +{ + int prio = rt_mutex_getprio(task); + + if (task->prio != prio || dl_prio(prio)) + rt_mutex_setprio(task, prio); +} + +/* + * Adjust task priority (undo boosting). Called from the exit path of + * rt_mutex_slowunlock() and rt_mutex_slowlock(). + * + * (Note: We do this outside of the protection of lock->wait_lock to + * allow the lock to be taken while or before we readjust the priority + * of task. We do not use the spin_xx_mutex() variants here as we are + * outside of the debug path.) + */ +static void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task) +{ + unsigned long flags; + + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags); + __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); +} + +/* + * Deadlock detection is conditional: + * + * If CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=n, deadlock detection is only conducted + * if the detect argument is == RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK. + * + * If CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=y, deadlock detection is always + * conducted independent of the detect argument. + * + * If the waiter argument is NULL this indicates the deboost path and + * deadlock detection is disabled independent of the detect argument + * and the config settings. + */ +static bool rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, + enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk) +{ + /* + * This is just a wrapper function for the following call, + * because debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock() smells like a magic + * debug feature and I wanted to keep the cond function in the + * main source file along with the comments instead of having + * two of the same in the headers. + */ + return debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(waiter, chwalk); +} + +/* + * Max number of times we'll walk the boosting chain: + */ +int max_lock_depth = 1024; + +static inline struct rt_mutex *task_blocked_on_lock(struct task_struct *p) +{ + return p->pi_blocked_on ? p->pi_blocked_on->lock : NULL; +} + +/* + * Adjust the priority chain. Also used for deadlock detection. + * Decreases task's usage by one - may thus free the task. + * + * @task: the task owning the mutex (owner) for which a chain walk is + * probably needed + * @chwalk: do we have to carry out deadlock detection? + * @orig_lock: the mutex (can be NULL if we are walking the chain to recheck + * things for a task that has just got its priority adjusted, and + * is waiting on a mutex) + * @next_lock: the mutex on which the owner of @orig_lock was blocked before + * we dropped its pi_lock. Is never dereferenced, only used for + * comparison to detect lock chain changes. + * @orig_waiter: rt_mutex_waiter struct for the task that has just donated + * its priority to the mutex owner (can be NULL in the case + * depicted above or if the top waiter is gone away and we are + * actually deboosting the owner) + * @top_task: the current top waiter + * + * Returns 0 or -EDEADLK. + * + * Chain walk basics and protection scope + * + * [R] refcount on task + * [P] task->pi_lock held + * [L] rtmutex->wait_lock held + * + * Step Description Protected by + * function arguments: + * @task [R] + * @orig_lock if != NULL @top_task is blocked on it + * @next_lock Unprotected. Cannot be + * dereferenced. Only used for + * comparison. + * @orig_waiter if != NULL @top_task is blocked on it + * @top_task current, or in case of proxy + * locking protected by calling + * code + * again: + * loop_sanity_check(); + * retry: + * [1] lock(task->pi_lock); [R] acquire [P] + * [2] waiter = task->pi_blocked_on; [P] + * [3] check_exit_conditions_1(); [P] + * [4] lock = waiter->lock; [P] + * [5] if (!try_lock(lock->wait_lock)) { [P] try to acquire [L] + * unlock(task->pi_lock); release [P] + * goto retry; + * } + * [6] check_exit_conditions_2(); [P] + [L] + * [7] requeue_lock_waiter(lock, waiter); [P] + [L] + * [8] unlock(task->pi_lock); release [P] + * put_task_struct(task); release [R] + * [9] check_exit_conditions_3(); [L] + * [10] task = owner(lock); [L] + * get_task_struct(task); [L] acquire [R] + * lock(task->pi_lock); [L] acquire [P] + * [11] requeue_pi_waiter(tsk, waiters(lock));[P] + [L] + * [12] check_exit_conditions_4(); [P] + [L] + * [13] unlock(task->pi_lock); release [P] + * unlock(lock->wait_lock); release [L] + * goto again; + */ +static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, + enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk, + struct rt_mutex *orig_lock, + struct rt_mutex *next_lock, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *orig_waiter, + struct task_struct *top_task) +{ + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, *top_waiter = orig_waiter; + struct rt_mutex_waiter *prerequeue_top_waiter; + int ret = 0, depth = 0; + struct rt_mutex *lock; + bool detect_deadlock; + unsigned long flags; + bool requeue = true; + + detect_deadlock = rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(orig_waiter, chwalk); + + /* + * The (de)boosting is a step by step approach with a lot of + * pitfalls. We want this to be preemptible and we want hold a + * maximum of two locks per step. So we have to check + * carefully whether things change under us. + */ + again: + /* + * We limit the lock chain length for each invocation. + */ + if (++depth > max_lock_depth) { + static int prev_max; + + /* + * Print this only once. If the admin changes the limit, + * print a new message when reaching the limit again. + */ + if (prev_max != max_lock_depth) { + prev_max = max_lock_depth; + printk(KERN_WARNING "Maximum lock depth %d reached " + "task: %s (%d)\n", max_lock_depth, + top_task->comm, task_pid_nr(top_task)); + } + put_task_struct(task); + + return -EDEADLK; + } + + /* + * We are fully preemptible here and only hold the refcount on + * @task. So everything can have changed under us since the + * caller or our own code below (goto retry/again) dropped all + * locks. + */ + retry: + /* + * [1] Task cannot go away as we did a get_task() before ! + */ + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags); + + /* + * [2] Get the waiter on which @task is blocked on. + */ + waiter = task->pi_blocked_on; + + /* + * [3] check_exit_conditions_1() protected by task->pi_lock. + */ + + /* + * Check whether the end of the boosting chain has been + * reached or the state of the chain has changed while we + * dropped the locks. + */ + if (!waiter) + goto out_unlock_pi; + + /* + * Check the orig_waiter state. After we dropped the locks, + * the previous owner of the lock might have released the lock. + */ + if (orig_waiter && !rt_mutex_owner(orig_lock)) + goto out_unlock_pi; + + /* + * We dropped all locks after taking a refcount on @task, so + * the task might have moved on in the lock chain or even left + * the chain completely and blocks now on an unrelated lock or + * on @orig_lock. + * + * We stored the lock on which @task was blocked in @next_lock, + * so we can detect the chain change. + */ + if (next_lock != waiter->lock) + goto out_unlock_pi; + + /* + * Drop out, when the task has no waiters. Note, + * top_waiter can be NULL, when we are in the deboosting + * mode! + */ + if (top_waiter) { + if (!task_has_pi_waiters(task)) + goto out_unlock_pi; + /* + * If deadlock detection is off, we stop here if we + * are not the top pi waiter of the task. If deadlock + * detection is enabled we continue, but stop the + * requeueing in the chain walk. + */ + if (top_waiter != task_top_pi_waiter(task)) { + if (!detect_deadlock) + goto out_unlock_pi; + else + requeue = false; + } + } + + /* + * If the waiter priority is the same as the task priority + * then there is no further priority adjustment necessary. If + * deadlock detection is off, we stop the chain walk. If its + * enabled we continue, but stop the requeueing in the chain + * walk. + */ + if (waiter->prio == task->prio) { + if (!detect_deadlock) + goto out_unlock_pi; + else + requeue = false; + } + + /* + * [4] Get the next lock + */ + lock = waiter->lock; + /* + * [5] We need to trylock here as we are holding task->pi_lock, + * which is the reverse lock order versus the other rtmutex + * operations. + */ + if (!raw_spin_trylock(&lock->wait_lock)) { + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); + cpu_relax(); + goto retry; + } + + /* + * [6] check_exit_conditions_2() protected by task->pi_lock and + * lock->wait_lock. + * + * Deadlock detection. If the lock is the same as the original + * lock which caused us to walk the lock chain or if the + * current lock is owned by the task which initiated the chain + * walk, we detected a deadlock. + */ + if (lock == orig_lock || rt_mutex_owner(lock) == top_task) { + debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(chwalk, orig_waiter, lock); + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + ret = -EDEADLK; + goto out_unlock_pi; + } + + /* + * If we just follow the lock chain for deadlock detection, no + * need to do all the requeue operations. To avoid a truckload + * of conditionals around the various places below, just do the + * minimum chain walk checks. + */ + if (!requeue) { + /* + * No requeue[7] here. Just release @task [8] + */ + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); + put_task_struct(task); + + /* + * [9] check_exit_conditions_3 protected by lock->wait_lock. + * If there is no owner of the lock, end of chain. + */ + if (!rt_mutex_owner(lock)) { + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + return 0; + } + + /* [10] Grab the next task, i.e. owner of @lock */ + task = rt_mutex_owner(lock); + get_task_struct(task); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags); + + /* + * No requeue [11] here. We just do deadlock detection. + * + * [12] Store whether owner is blocked + * itself. Decision is made after dropping the locks + */ + next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(task); + /* + * Get the top waiter for the next iteration + */ + top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); + + /* [13] Drop locks */ + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + + /* If owner is not blocked, end of chain. */ + if (!next_lock) + goto out_put_task; + goto again; + } + + /* + * Store the current top waiter before doing the requeue + * operation on @lock. We need it for the boost/deboost + * decision below. + */ + prerequeue_top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); + + /* [7] Requeue the waiter in the lock waiter list. */ + rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter); + waiter->prio = task->prio; + rt_mutex_enqueue(lock, waiter); + + /* [8] Release the task */ + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); + put_task_struct(task); + + /* + * [9] check_exit_conditions_3 protected by lock->wait_lock. + * + * We must abort the chain walk if there is no lock owner even + * in the dead lock detection case, as we have nothing to + * follow here. This is the end of the chain we are walking. + */ + if (!rt_mutex_owner(lock)) { + /* + * If the requeue [7] above changed the top waiter, + * then we need to wake the new top waiter up to try + * to get the lock. + */ + if (prerequeue_top_waiter != rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) + wake_up_process(rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->task); + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + return 0; + } + + /* [10] Grab the next task, i.e. the owner of @lock */ + task = rt_mutex_owner(lock); + get_task_struct(task); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags); + + /* [11] requeue the pi waiters if necessary */ + if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) { + /* + * The waiter became the new top (highest priority) + * waiter on the lock. Replace the previous top waiter + * in the owner tasks pi waiters list with this waiter + * and adjust the priority of the owner. + */ + rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, prerequeue_top_waiter); + rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter); + __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task); + + } else if (prerequeue_top_waiter == waiter) { + /* + * The waiter was the top waiter on the lock, but is + * no longer the top prority waiter. Replace waiter in + * the owner tasks pi waiters list with the new top + * (highest priority) waiter and adjust the priority + * of the owner. + * The new top waiter is stored in @waiter so that + * @waiter == @top_waiter evaluates to true below and + * we continue to deboost the rest of the chain. + */ + rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter); + waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); + rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter); + __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task); + } else { + /* + * Nothing changed. No need to do any priority + * adjustment. + */ + } + + /* + * [12] check_exit_conditions_4() protected by task->pi_lock + * and lock->wait_lock. The actual decisions are made after we + * dropped the locks. + * + * Check whether the task which owns the current lock is pi + * blocked itself. If yes we store a pointer to the lock for + * the lock chain change detection above. After we dropped + * task->pi_lock next_lock cannot be dereferenced anymore. + */ + next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(task); + /* + * Store the top waiter of @lock for the end of chain walk + * decision below. + */ + top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); + + /* [13] Drop the locks */ + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + + /* + * Make the actual exit decisions [12], based on the stored + * values. + * + * We reached the end of the lock chain. Stop right here. No + * point to go back just to figure that out. + */ + if (!next_lock) + goto out_put_task; + + /* + * If the current waiter is not the top waiter on the lock, + * then we can stop the chain walk here if we are not in full + * deadlock detection mode. + */ + if (!detect_deadlock && waiter != top_waiter) + goto out_put_task; + + goto again; + + out_unlock_pi: + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); + out_put_task: + put_task_struct(task); + + return ret; +} + +/* + * Try to take an rt-mutex + * + * Must be called with lock->wait_lock held. + * + * @lock: The lock to be acquired. + * @task: The task which wants to acquire the lock + * @waiter: The waiter that is queued to the lock's wait list if the + * callsite called task_blocked_on_lock(), otherwise NULL + */ +static int try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *task, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) +{ + unsigned long flags; + + /* + * Before testing whether we can acquire @lock, we set the + * RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS bit in @lock->owner. This forces all + * other tasks which try to modify @lock into the slow path + * and they serialize on @lock->wait_lock. + * + * The RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS bit can have a transitional state + * as explained at the top of this file if and only if: + * + * - There is a lock owner. The caller must fixup the + * transient state if it does a trylock or leaves the lock + * function due to a signal or timeout. + * + * - @task acquires the lock and there are no other + * waiters. This is undone in rt_mutex_set_owner(@task) at + * the end of this function. + */ + mark_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); + + /* + * If @lock has an owner, give up. + */ + if (rt_mutex_owner(lock)) + return 0; + + /* + * If @waiter != NULL, @task has already enqueued the waiter + * into @lock waiter list. If @waiter == NULL then this is a + * trylock attempt. + */ + if (waiter) { + /* + * If waiter is not the highest priority waiter of + * @lock, give up. + */ + if (waiter != rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) + return 0; + + /* + * We can acquire the lock. Remove the waiter from the + * lock waiters list. + */ + rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter); + + } else { + /* + * If the lock has waiters already we check whether @task is + * eligible to take over the lock. + * + * If there are no other waiters, @task can acquire + * the lock. @task->pi_blocked_on is NULL, so it does + * not need to be dequeued. + */ + if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) { + /* + * If @task->prio is greater than or equal to + * the top waiter priority (kernel view), + * @task lost. + */ + if (task->prio >= rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->prio) + return 0; + + /* + * The current top waiter stays enqueued. We + * don't have to change anything in the lock + * waiters order. + */ + } else { + /* + * No waiters. Take the lock without the + * pi_lock dance.@task->pi_blocked_on is NULL + * and we have no waiters to enqueue in @task + * pi waiters list. + */ + goto takeit; + } + } + + /* + * Clear @task->pi_blocked_on. Requires protection by + * @task->pi_lock. Redundant operation for the @waiter == NULL + * case, but conditionals are more expensive than a redundant + * store. + */ + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags); + task->pi_blocked_on = NULL; + /* + * Finish the lock acquisition. @task is the new owner. If + * other waiters exist we have to insert the highest priority + * waiter into @task->pi_waiters list. + */ + if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) + rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); + +takeit: + /* We got the lock. */ + debug_rt_mutex_lock(lock); + + /* + * This either preserves the RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS bit if there + * are still waiters or clears it. + */ + rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, task); + + rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, task); + + return 1; +} + +/* + * Task blocks on lock. + * + * Prepare waiter and propagate pi chain + * + * This must be called with lock->wait_lock held. + */ +static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, + struct task_struct *task, + enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk) +{ + struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); + struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter = waiter; + struct rt_mutex *next_lock; + int chain_walk = 0, res; + unsigned long flags; + + /* + * Early deadlock detection. We really don't want the task to + * enqueue on itself just to untangle the mess later. It's not + * only an optimization. We drop the locks, so another waiter + * can come in before the chain walk detects the deadlock. So + * the other will detect the deadlock and return -EDEADLOCK, + * which is wrong, as the other waiter is not in a deadlock + * situation. + */ + if (owner == task) + return -EDEADLK; + + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags); + __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task); + waiter->task = task; + waiter->lock = lock; + waiter->prio = task->prio; + + /* Get the top priority waiter on the lock */ + if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) + top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); + rt_mutex_enqueue(lock, waiter); + + task->pi_blocked_on = waiter; + + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); + + if (!owner) + return 0; + + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&owner->pi_lock, flags); + if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) { + rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(owner, top_waiter); + rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(owner, waiter); + + __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner); + if (owner->pi_blocked_on) + chain_walk = 1; + } else if (rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(waiter, chwalk)) { + chain_walk = 1; + } + + /* Store the lock on which owner is blocked or NULL */ + next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(owner); + + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->pi_lock, flags); + /* + * Even if full deadlock detection is on, if the owner is not + * blocked itself, we can avoid finding this out in the chain + * walk. + */ + if (!chain_walk || !next_lock) + return 0; + + /* + * The owner can't disappear while holding a lock, + * so the owner struct is protected by wait_lock. + * Gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! + */ + get_task_struct(owner); + + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + + res = rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, chwalk, lock, + next_lock, waiter, task); + + raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); + + return res; +} + +/* + * Wake up the next waiter on the lock. + * + * Remove the top waiter from the current tasks pi waiter list and + * wake it up. + * + * Called with lock->wait_lock held. + */ +static void wakeup_next_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock) +{ + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter; + unsigned long flags; + + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->pi_lock, flags); + + waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); + + /* + * Remove it from current->pi_waiters. We do not adjust a + * possible priority boost right now. We execute wakeup in the + * boosted mode and go back to normal after releasing + * lock->wait_lock. + */ + rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(current, waiter); + + /* + * As we are waking up the top waiter, and the waiter stays + * queued on the lock until it gets the lock, this lock + * obviously has waiters. Just set the bit here and this has + * the added benefit of forcing all new tasks into the + * slow path making sure no task of lower priority than + * the top waiter can steal this lock. + */ + lock->owner = (void *) RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS; + + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(¤t->pi_lock, flags); + + /* + * It's safe to dereference waiter as it cannot go away as + * long as we hold lock->wait_lock. The waiter task needs to + * acquire it in order to dequeue the waiter. + */ + wake_up_process(waiter->task); +} + +/* + * Remove a waiter from a lock and give up + * + * Must be called with lock->wait_lock held and + * have just failed to try_to_take_rt_mutex(). + */ +static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) +{ + bool is_top_waiter = (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)); + struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); + struct rt_mutex *next_lock; + unsigned long flags; + + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->pi_lock, flags); + rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter); + current->pi_blocked_on = NULL; + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(¤t->pi_lock, flags); + + /* + * Only update priority if the waiter was the highest priority + * waiter of the lock and there is an owner to update. + */ + if (!owner || !is_top_waiter) + return; + + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&owner->pi_lock, flags); + + rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(owner, waiter); + + if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) + rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(owner, rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)); + + __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner); + + /* Store the lock on which owner is blocked or NULL */ + next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(owner); + + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->pi_lock, flags); + + /* + * Don't walk the chain, if the owner task is not blocked + * itself. + */ + if (!next_lock) + return; + + /* gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! */ + get_task_struct(owner); + + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + + rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, lock, + next_lock, NULL, current); + + raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); +} + +/* + * Recheck the pi chain, in case we got a priority setting + * + * Called from sched_setscheduler + */ +void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task) +{ + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter; + struct rt_mutex *next_lock; + unsigned long flags; + + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags); + + waiter = task->pi_blocked_on; + if (!waiter || (waiter->prio == task->prio && + !dl_prio(task->prio))) { + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); + return; + } + next_lock = waiter->lock; + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); + + /* gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! */ + get_task_struct(task); + + rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, NULL, + next_lock, NULL, task); +} + +/** + * __rt_mutex_slowlock() - Perform the wait-wake-try-to-take loop + * @lock: the rt_mutex to take + * @state: the state the task should block in (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE + * or TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) + * @timeout: the pre-initialized and started timer, or NULL for none + * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter + * + * lock->wait_lock must be held by the caller. + */ +static int __sched +__rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, + struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) +{ + int ret = 0; + + for (;;) { + /* Try to acquire the lock: */ + if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, waiter)) + break; + + /* + * TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE checks for signals and + * timeout. Ignored otherwise. + */ + if (unlikely(state == TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)) { + /* Signal pending? */ + if (signal_pending(current)) + ret = -EINTR; + if (timeout && !timeout->task) + ret = -ETIMEDOUT; + if (ret) + break; + } + + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + + debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(waiter); + + schedule_rt_mutex(lock); + + raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); + set_current_state(state); + } + + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); + return ret; +} + +static void rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(int res, int detect_deadlock, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *w) +{ + /* + * If the result is not -EDEADLOCK or the caller requested + * deadlock detection, nothing to do here. + */ + if (res != -EDEADLOCK || detect_deadlock) + return; + + /* + * Yell lowdly and stop the task right here. + */ + rt_mutex_print_deadlock(w); + while (1) { + set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); + schedule(); + } +} + +/* + * Slow path lock function: + */ +static int __sched +rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, + struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, + enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk) +{ + struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter; + int ret = 0; + + debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(&waiter); + RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter.pi_tree_entry); + RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter.tree_entry); + + raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); + + /* Try to acquire the lock again: */ + if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL)) { + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + return 0; + } + + set_current_state(state); + + /* Setup the timer, when timeout != NULL */ + if (unlikely(timeout)) { + hrtimer_start_expires(&timeout->timer, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS); + if (!hrtimer_active(&timeout->timer)) + timeout->task = NULL; + } + + ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, current, chwalk); + + if (likely(!ret)) + /* sleep on the mutex */ + ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, state, timeout, &waiter); + + if (unlikely(ret)) { + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); + if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) + remove_waiter(lock, &waiter); + rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, chwalk, &waiter); + } + + /* + * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit + * unconditionally. We might have to fix that up. + */ + fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); + + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + + /* Remove pending timer: */ + if (unlikely(timeout)) + hrtimer_cancel(&timeout->timer); + + debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter); + + return ret; +} + +/* + * Slow path try-lock function: + */ +static inline int rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock) +{ + int ret; + + /* + * If the lock already has an owner we fail to get the lock. + * This can be done without taking the @lock->wait_lock as + * it is only being read, and this is a trylock anyway. + */ + if (rt_mutex_owner(lock)) + return 0; + + /* + * The mutex has currently no owner. Lock the wait lock and + * try to acquire the lock. + */ + raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); + + ret = try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL); + + /* + * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the lock waiters bit + * unconditionally. Clean this up. + */ + fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); + + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + + return ret; +} + +/* + * Slow path to release a rt-mutex: + */ +static void __sched +rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock) +{ + raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); + + debug_rt_mutex_unlock(lock); + + rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(current); + + /* + * We must be careful here if the fast path is enabled. If we + * have no waiters queued we cannot set owner to NULL here + * because of: + * + * foo->lock->owner = NULL; + * rtmutex_lock(foo->lock); <- fast path + * free = atomic_dec_and_test(foo->refcnt); + * rtmutex_unlock(foo->lock); <- fast path + * if (free) + * kfree(foo); + * raw_spin_unlock(foo->lock->wait_lock); + * + * So for the fastpath enabled kernel: + * + * Nothing can set the waiters bit as long as we hold + * lock->wait_lock. So we do the following sequence: + * + * owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); + * clear_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); + * raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + * if (cmpxchg(&lock->owner, owner, 0) == owner) + * return; + * goto retry; + * + * The fastpath disabled variant is simple as all access to + * lock->owner is serialized by lock->wait_lock: + * + * lock->owner = NULL; + * raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + */ + while (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) { + /* Drops lock->wait_lock ! */ + if (unlock_rt_mutex_safe(lock) == true) + return; + /* Relock the rtmutex and try again */ + raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); + } + + /* + * The wakeup next waiter path does not suffer from the above + * race. See the comments there. + */ + wakeup_next_waiter(lock); + + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + + /* Undo pi boosting if necessary: */ + rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current); +} + +/* + * debug aware fast / slowpath lock,trylock,unlock + * + * The atomic acquire/release ops are compiled away, when either the + * architecture does not support cmpxchg or when debugging is enabled. + */ +static inline int +rt_mutex_fastlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, + int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, + struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, + enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk)) +{ + if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) { + rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current); + return 0; + } else + return slowfn(lock, state, NULL, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK); +} + +static inline int +rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, + struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, + enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk, + int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, + struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, + enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk)) +{ + if (chwalk == RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK && + likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) { + rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current); + return 0; + } else + return slowfn(lock, state, timeout, chwalk); +} + +static inline int +rt_mutex_fasttrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock, + int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock)) +{ + if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) { + rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current); + return 1; + } + return slowfn(lock); +} + +static inline void +rt_mutex_fastunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, + void (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock)) +{ + if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, current, NULL))) + rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(current); + else + slowfn(lock); +} + +/** + * rt_mutex_lock - lock a rt_mutex + * + * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked + */ +void __sched rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock) +{ + might_sleep(); + + rt_mutex_fastlock(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, rt_mutex_slowlock); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock); + +/** + * rt_mutex_lock_interruptible - lock a rt_mutex interruptible + * + * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked + * + * Returns: + * 0 on success + * -EINTR when interrupted by a signal + */ +int __sched rt_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct rt_mutex *lock) +{ + might_sleep(); + + return rt_mutex_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, rt_mutex_slowlock); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock_interruptible); + +/* + * Futex variant with full deadlock detection. + */ +int rt_mutex_timed_futex_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, + struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout) +{ + might_sleep(); + + return rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout, + RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK, + rt_mutex_slowlock); +} + +/** + * rt_mutex_timed_lock - lock a rt_mutex interruptible + * the timeout structure is provided + * by the caller + * + * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked + * @timeout: timeout structure or NULL (no timeout) + * + * Returns: + * 0 on success + * -EINTR when interrupted by a signal + * -ETIMEDOUT when the timeout expired + */ +int +rt_mutex_timed_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout) +{ + might_sleep(); + + return rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout, + RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, + rt_mutex_slowlock); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_timed_lock); + +/** + * rt_mutex_trylock - try to lock a rt_mutex + * + * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked + * + * Returns 1 on success and 0 on contention + */ +int __sched rt_mutex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock) +{ + return rt_mutex_fasttrylock(lock, rt_mutex_slowtrylock); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_trylock); + +/** + * rt_mutex_unlock - unlock a rt_mutex + * + * @lock: the rt_mutex to be unlocked + */ +void __sched rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock) +{ + rt_mutex_fastunlock(lock, rt_mutex_slowunlock); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_unlock); + +/** + * rt_mutex_destroy - mark a mutex unusable + * @lock: the mutex to be destroyed + * + * This function marks the mutex uninitialized, and any subsequent + * use of the mutex is forbidden. The mutex must not be locked when + * this function is called. + */ +void rt_mutex_destroy(struct rt_mutex *lock) +{ + WARN_ON(rt_mutex_is_locked(lock)); +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES + lock->magic = NULL; +#endif +} + +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_destroy); + +/** + * __rt_mutex_init - initialize the rt lock + * + * @lock: the rt lock to be initialized + * + * Initialize the rt lock to unlocked state. + * + * Initializing of a locked rt lock is not allowed + */ +void __rt_mutex_init(struct rt_mutex *lock, const char *name) +{ + lock->owner = NULL; + raw_spin_lock_init(&lock->wait_lock); + lock->waiters = RB_ROOT; + lock->waiters_leftmost = NULL; + + debug_rt_mutex_init(lock, name); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rt_mutex_init); + +/** + * rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked - initialize and lock a rt_mutex on behalf of a + * proxy owner + * + * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked + * @proxy_owner:the task to set as owner + * + * No locking. Caller has to do serializing itself + * Special API call for PI-futex support + */ +void rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex *lock, + struct task_struct *proxy_owner) +{ + __rt_mutex_init(lock, NULL); + debug_rt_mutex_proxy_lock(lock, proxy_owner); + rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, proxy_owner); + rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, proxy_owner); +} + +/** + * rt_mutex_proxy_unlock - release a lock on behalf of owner + * + * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked + * + * No locking. Caller has to do serializing itself + * Special API call for PI-futex support + */ +void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, + struct task_struct *proxy_owner) +{ + debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(lock); + rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, NULL); + rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(proxy_owner); +} + +/** + * rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() - Start lock acquisition for another task + * @lock: the rt_mutex to take + * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter + * @task: the task to prepare + * + * Returns: + * 0 - task blocked on lock + * 1 - acquired the lock for task, caller should wake it up + * <0 - error + * + * Special API call for FUTEX_REQUEUE_PI support. + */ +int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, + struct task_struct *task) +{ + int ret; + + raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); + + if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, task, NULL)) { + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + return 1; + } + + /* We enforce deadlock detection for futexes */ + ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, + RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK); + + if (ret && !rt_mutex_owner(lock)) { + /* + * Reset the return value. We might have + * returned with -EDEADLK and the owner + * released the lock while we were walking the + * pi chain. Let the waiter sort it out. + */ + ret = 0; + } + + if (unlikely(ret)) + remove_waiter(lock, waiter); + + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + + debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(waiter); + + return ret; +} + +/** + * rt_mutex_next_owner - return the next owner of the lock + * + * @lock: the rt lock query + * + * Returns the next owner of the lock or NULL + * + * Caller has to serialize against other accessors to the lock + * itself. + * + * Special API call for PI-futex support + */ +struct task_struct *rt_mutex_next_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock) +{ + if (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) + return NULL; + + return rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->task; +} + +/** + * rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock() - Complete lock acquisition + * @lock: the rt_mutex we were woken on + * @to: the timeout, null if none. hrtimer should already have + * been started. + * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter + * + * Complete the lock acquisition started our behalf by another thread. + * + * Returns: + * 0 - success + * <0 - error, one of -EINTR, -ETIMEDOUT + * + * Special API call for PI-futex requeue support + */ +int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, + struct hrtimer_sleeper *to, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) +{ + int ret; + + raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); + + set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); + + /* sleep on the mutex */ + ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, to, waiter); + + if (unlikely(ret)) + remove_waiter(lock, waiter); + + /* + * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might + * have to fix that up. + */ + fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); + + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + + return ret; +} |