diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/locking')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/locktorture.c | 164 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/mutex.c | 9 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/osq_lock.c | 11 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c | 90 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/qrwlock.c | 8 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 6 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 33 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 5 |
11 files changed, 244 insertions, 92 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index 4e49cc4c9..60ace5661 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ * Started by Ingo Molnar: * * Copyright (C) 2006,2007 Red Hat, Inc., Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> - * Copyright (C) 2007 Red Hat, Inc., Peter Zijlstra <pzijlstr@redhat.com> + * Copyright (C) 2007 Red Hat, Inc., Peter Zijlstra * * this code maps all the lock dependencies as they occur in a live kernel * and will warn about the following classes of locking bugs: @@ -2738,7 +2738,7 @@ static void __lockdep_trace_alloc(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned long flags) return; /* no reclaim without waiting on it */ - if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT)) + if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM)) return; /* this guy won't enter reclaim */ diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c index d83d798be..dbb61a302 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ * Started by Ingo Molnar: * * Copyright (C) 2006,2007 Red Hat, Inc., Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> - * Copyright (C) 2007 Red Hat, Inc., Peter Zijlstra <pzijlstr@redhat.com> + * Copyright (C) 2007 Red Hat, Inc., Peter Zijlstra * * Code for /proc/lockdep and /proc/lockdep_stats: * diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c index 32244186f..8ef1919d6 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c +++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c @@ -17,12 +17,14 @@ * * Copyright (C) IBM Corporation, 2014 * - * Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com> + * Authors: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com> + * Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> * Based on kernel/rcu/torture.c. */ #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/kthread.h> +#include <linux/sched/rt.h> #include <linux/spinlock.h> #include <linux/rwlock.h> #include <linux/mutex.h> @@ -34,6 +36,7 @@ #include <linux/moduleparam.h> #include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/percpu-rwsem.h> #include <linux/torture.h> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); @@ -91,11 +94,13 @@ struct lock_torture_ops { void (*init)(void); int (*writelock)(void); void (*write_delay)(struct torture_random_state *trsp); + void (*task_boost)(struct torture_random_state *trsp); void (*writeunlock)(void); int (*readlock)(void); void (*read_delay)(struct torture_random_state *trsp); void (*readunlock)(void); - unsigned long flags; + + unsigned long flags; /* for irq spinlocks */ const char *name; }; @@ -139,9 +144,15 @@ static void torture_lock_busted_write_unlock(void) /* BUGGY, do not use in real life!!! */ } +static void torture_boost_dummy(struct torture_random_state *trsp) +{ + /* Only rtmutexes care about priority */ +} + static struct lock_torture_ops lock_busted_ops = { .writelock = torture_lock_busted_write_lock, .write_delay = torture_lock_busted_write_delay, + .task_boost = torture_boost_dummy, .writeunlock = torture_lock_busted_write_unlock, .readlock = NULL, .read_delay = NULL, @@ -185,6 +196,7 @@ static void torture_spin_lock_write_unlock(void) __releases(torture_spinlock) static struct lock_torture_ops spin_lock_ops = { .writelock = torture_spin_lock_write_lock, .write_delay = torture_spin_lock_write_delay, + .task_boost = torture_boost_dummy, .writeunlock = torture_spin_lock_write_unlock, .readlock = NULL, .read_delay = NULL, @@ -211,6 +223,7 @@ __releases(torture_spinlock) static struct lock_torture_ops spin_lock_irq_ops = { .writelock = torture_spin_lock_write_lock_irq, .write_delay = torture_spin_lock_write_delay, + .task_boost = torture_boost_dummy, .writeunlock = torture_lock_spin_write_unlock_irq, .readlock = NULL, .read_delay = NULL, @@ -275,6 +288,7 @@ static void torture_rwlock_read_unlock(void) __releases(torture_rwlock) static struct lock_torture_ops rw_lock_ops = { .writelock = torture_rwlock_write_lock, .write_delay = torture_rwlock_write_delay, + .task_boost = torture_boost_dummy, .writeunlock = torture_rwlock_write_unlock, .readlock = torture_rwlock_read_lock, .read_delay = torture_rwlock_read_delay, @@ -315,6 +329,7 @@ __releases(torture_rwlock) static struct lock_torture_ops rw_lock_irq_ops = { .writelock = torture_rwlock_write_lock_irq, .write_delay = torture_rwlock_write_delay, + .task_boost = torture_boost_dummy, .writeunlock = torture_rwlock_write_unlock_irq, .readlock = torture_rwlock_read_lock_irq, .read_delay = torture_rwlock_read_delay, @@ -354,6 +369,7 @@ static void torture_mutex_unlock(void) __releases(torture_mutex) static struct lock_torture_ops mutex_lock_ops = { .writelock = torture_mutex_lock, .write_delay = torture_mutex_delay, + .task_boost = torture_boost_dummy, .writeunlock = torture_mutex_unlock, .readlock = NULL, .read_delay = NULL, @@ -361,6 +377,90 @@ static struct lock_torture_ops mutex_lock_ops = { .name = "mutex_lock" }; +#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES +static DEFINE_RT_MUTEX(torture_rtmutex); + +static int torture_rtmutex_lock(void) __acquires(torture_rtmutex) +{ + rt_mutex_lock(&torture_rtmutex); + return 0; +} + +static void torture_rtmutex_boost(struct torture_random_state *trsp) +{ + int policy; + struct sched_param param; + const unsigned int factor = 50000; /* yes, quite arbitrary */ + + if (!rt_task(current)) { + /* + * (1) Boost priority once every ~50k operations. When the + * task tries to take the lock, the rtmutex it will account + * for the new priority, and do any corresponding pi-dance. + */ + if (!(torture_random(trsp) % + (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * factor))) { + policy = SCHED_FIFO; + param.sched_priority = MAX_RT_PRIO - 1; + } else /* common case, do nothing */ + return; + } else { + /* + * The task will remain boosted for another ~500k operations, + * then restored back to its original prio, and so forth. + * + * When @trsp is nil, we want to force-reset the task for + * stopping the kthread. + */ + if (!trsp || !(torture_random(trsp) % + (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * factor * 2))) { + policy = SCHED_NORMAL; + param.sched_priority = 0; + } else /* common case, do nothing */ + return; + } + + sched_setscheduler_nocheck(current, policy, ¶m); +} + +static void torture_rtmutex_delay(struct torture_random_state *trsp) +{ + const unsigned long shortdelay_us = 2; + const unsigned long longdelay_ms = 100; + + /* + * We want a short delay mostly to emulate likely code, and + * we want a long delay occasionally to force massive contention. + */ + if (!(torture_random(trsp) % + (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * 2000 * longdelay_ms))) + mdelay(longdelay_ms); + if (!(torture_random(trsp) % + (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * 2 * shortdelay_us))) + udelay(shortdelay_us); +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT + if (!(torture_random(trsp) % (cxt.nrealwriters_stress * 20000))) + preempt_schedule(); /* Allow test to be preempted. */ +#endif +} + +static void torture_rtmutex_unlock(void) __releases(torture_rtmutex) +{ + rt_mutex_unlock(&torture_rtmutex); +} + +static struct lock_torture_ops rtmutex_lock_ops = { + .writelock = torture_rtmutex_lock, + .write_delay = torture_rtmutex_delay, + .task_boost = torture_rtmutex_boost, + .writeunlock = torture_rtmutex_unlock, + .readlock = NULL, + .read_delay = NULL, + .readunlock = NULL, + .name = "rtmutex_lock" +}; +#endif + static DECLARE_RWSEM(torture_rwsem); static int torture_rwsem_down_write(void) __acquires(torture_rwsem) { @@ -419,6 +519,7 @@ static void torture_rwsem_up_read(void) __releases(torture_rwsem) static struct lock_torture_ops rwsem_lock_ops = { .writelock = torture_rwsem_down_write, .write_delay = torture_rwsem_write_delay, + .task_boost = torture_boost_dummy, .writeunlock = torture_rwsem_up_write, .readlock = torture_rwsem_down_read, .read_delay = torture_rwsem_read_delay, @@ -426,6 +527,48 @@ static struct lock_torture_ops rwsem_lock_ops = { .name = "rwsem_lock" }; +#include <linux/percpu-rwsem.h> +static struct percpu_rw_semaphore pcpu_rwsem; + +void torture_percpu_rwsem_init(void) +{ + BUG_ON(percpu_init_rwsem(&pcpu_rwsem)); +} + +static int torture_percpu_rwsem_down_write(void) __acquires(pcpu_rwsem) +{ + percpu_down_write(&pcpu_rwsem); + return 0; +} + +static void torture_percpu_rwsem_up_write(void) __releases(pcpu_rwsem) +{ + percpu_up_write(&pcpu_rwsem); +} + +static int torture_percpu_rwsem_down_read(void) __acquires(pcpu_rwsem) +{ + percpu_down_read(&pcpu_rwsem); + return 0; +} + +static void torture_percpu_rwsem_up_read(void) __releases(pcpu_rwsem) +{ + percpu_up_read(&pcpu_rwsem); +} + +static struct lock_torture_ops percpu_rwsem_lock_ops = { + .init = torture_percpu_rwsem_init, + .writelock = torture_percpu_rwsem_down_write, + .write_delay = torture_rwsem_write_delay, + .task_boost = torture_boost_dummy, + .writeunlock = torture_percpu_rwsem_up_write, + .readlock = torture_percpu_rwsem_down_read, + .read_delay = torture_rwsem_read_delay, + .readunlock = torture_percpu_rwsem_up_read, + .name = "percpu_rwsem_lock" +}; + /* * Lock torture writer kthread. Repeatedly acquires and releases * the lock, checking for duplicate acquisitions. @@ -442,6 +585,7 @@ static int lock_torture_writer(void *arg) if ((torture_random(&rand) & 0xfffff) == 0) schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1); + cxt.cur_ops->task_boost(&rand); cxt.cur_ops->writelock(); if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lock_is_write_held)) lwsp->n_lock_fail++; @@ -456,6 +600,8 @@ static int lock_torture_writer(void *arg) stutter_wait("lock_torture_writer"); } while (!torture_must_stop()); + + cxt.cur_ops->task_boost(NULL); /* reset prio */ torture_kthread_stopping("lock_torture_writer"); return 0; } @@ -642,7 +788,11 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void) &spin_lock_ops, &spin_lock_irq_ops, &rw_lock_ops, &rw_lock_irq_ops, &mutex_lock_ops, +#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES + &rtmutex_lock_ops, +#endif &rwsem_lock_ops, + &percpu_rwsem_lock_ops, }; if (!torture_init_begin(torture_type, verbose, &torture_runnable)) @@ -661,11 +811,11 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void) for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(torture_ops); i++) pr_alert(" %s", torture_ops[i]->name); pr_alert("\n"); - torture_init_end(); - return -EINVAL; + firsterr = -EINVAL; + goto unwind; } if (cxt.cur_ops->init) - cxt.cur_ops->init(); /* no "goto unwind" prior to this point!!! */ + cxt.cur_ops->init(); if (nwriters_stress >= 0) cxt.nrealwriters_stress = nwriters_stress; @@ -676,6 +826,10 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void) if (strncmp(torture_type, "mutex", 5) == 0) cxt.debug_lock = true; #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES + if (strncmp(torture_type, "rtmutex", 7) == 0) + cxt.debug_lock = true; +#endif #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK if ((strncmp(torture_type, "spin", 4) == 0) || (strncmp(torture_type, "rw_lock", 7) == 0)) diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h index fd91aaa45..5b9102a47 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h +++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node) node->locked = 0; node->next = NULL; - prev = xchg(lock, node); + prev = xchg_acquire(lock, node); if (likely(prev == NULL)) { /* * Lock acquired, don't need to set node->locked to 1. Threads @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ void mcs_spin_unlock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node) /* * Release the lock by setting it to NULL */ - if (likely(cmpxchg(lock, node, NULL) == node)) + if (likely(cmpxchg_release(lock, node, NULL) == node)) return; /* Wait until the next pointer is set */ while (!(next = READ_ONCE(node->next))) diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c index 4cccea6b8..0551c219c 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock) static inline bool mutex_try_to_acquire(struct mutex *lock) { return !mutex_is_locked(lock) && - (atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->count, 1, 0) == 1); + (atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->count, 1, 0) == 1); } /* @@ -529,7 +529,8 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, * Once more, try to acquire the lock. Only try-lock the mutex if * it is unlocked to reduce unnecessary xchg() operations. */ - if (!mutex_is_locked(lock) && (atomic_xchg(&lock->count, 0) == 1)) + if (!mutex_is_locked(lock) && + (atomic_xchg_acquire(&lock->count, 0) == 1)) goto skip_wait; debug_mutex_lock_common(lock, &waiter); @@ -553,7 +554,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, * non-negative in order to avoid unnecessary xchg operations: */ if (atomic_read(&lock->count) >= 0 && - (atomic_xchg(&lock->count, -1) == 1)) + (atomic_xchg_acquire(&lock->count, -1) == 1)) break; /* @@ -867,7 +868,7 @@ static inline int __mutex_trylock_slowpath(atomic_t *lock_count) spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags); - prev = atomic_xchg(&lock->count, -1); + prev = atomic_xchg_acquire(&lock->count, -1); if (likely(prev == 1)) { mutex_set_owner(lock); mutex_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_); diff --git a/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c b/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c index dc85ee23a..05a37857a 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c +++ b/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock, for (;;) { if (atomic_read(&lock->tail) == curr && - atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->tail, curr, old) == curr) { + atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->tail, curr, old) == curr) { /* * We were the last queued, we moved @lock back. @prev * will now observe @lock and will complete its @@ -92,6 +92,12 @@ bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock) node->next = NULL; node->cpu = curr; + /* + * We need both ACQUIRE (pairs with corresponding RELEASE in + * unlock() uncontended, or fastpath) and RELEASE (to publish + * the node fields we just initialised) semantics when updating + * the lock tail. + */ old = atomic_xchg(&lock->tail, curr); if (old == OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL) return true; @@ -184,7 +190,8 @@ void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock) /* * Fast path for the uncontended case. */ - if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->tail, curr, OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL) == curr)) + if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg_release(&lock->tail, curr, + OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL) == curr)) return; /* diff --git a/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c index f32567254..f231e0bb3 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c +++ b/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c @@ -17,50 +17,43 @@ int __percpu_init_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw, /* ->rw_sem represents the whole percpu_rw_semaphore for lockdep */ __init_rwsem(&brw->rw_sem, name, rwsem_key); - atomic_set(&brw->write_ctr, 0); + rcu_sync_init(&brw->rss, RCU_SCHED_SYNC); atomic_set(&brw->slow_read_ctr, 0); init_waitqueue_head(&brw->write_waitq); return 0; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__percpu_init_rwsem); void percpu_free_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) { + /* + * XXX: temporary kludge. The error path in alloc_super() + * assumes that percpu_free_rwsem() is safe after kzalloc(). + */ + if (!brw->fast_read_ctr) + return; + + rcu_sync_dtor(&brw->rss); free_percpu(brw->fast_read_ctr); brw->fast_read_ctr = NULL; /* catch use after free bugs */ } /* - * This is the fast-path for down_read/up_read, it only needs to ensure - * there is no pending writer (atomic_read(write_ctr) == 0) and inc/dec the - * fast per-cpu counter. The writer uses synchronize_sched_expedited() to - * serialize with the preempt-disabled section below. - * - * The nontrivial part is that we should guarantee acquire/release semantics - * in case when - * - * R_W: down_write() comes after up_read(), the writer should see all - * changes done by the reader - * or - * W_R: down_read() comes after up_write(), the reader should see all - * changes done by the writer + * This is the fast-path for down_read/up_read. If it succeeds we rely + * on the barriers provided by rcu_sync_enter/exit; see the comments in + * percpu_down_write() and percpu_up_write(). * * If this helper fails the callers rely on the normal rw_semaphore and * atomic_dec_and_test(), so in this case we have the necessary barriers. - * - * But if it succeeds we do not have any barriers, atomic_read(write_ctr) or - * __this_cpu_add() below can be reordered with any LOAD/STORE done by the - * reader inside the critical section. See the comments in down_write and - * up_write below. */ static bool update_fast_ctr(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw, unsigned int val) { - bool success = false; + bool success; preempt_disable(); - if (likely(!atomic_read(&brw->write_ctr))) { + success = rcu_sync_is_idle(&brw->rss); + if (likely(success)) __this_cpu_add(*brw->fast_read_ctr, val); - success = true; - } preempt_enable(); return success; @@ -77,16 +70,17 @@ static bool update_fast_ctr(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw, unsigned int val) void percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) { might_sleep(); - if (likely(update_fast_ctr(brw, +1))) { - rwsem_acquire_read(&brw->rw_sem.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_); + rwsem_acquire_read(&brw->rw_sem.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_); + + if (likely(update_fast_ctr(brw, +1))) return; - } - down_read(&brw->rw_sem); + /* Avoid rwsem_acquire_read() and rwsem_release() */ + __down_read(&brw->rw_sem); atomic_inc(&brw->slow_read_ctr); - /* avoid up_read()->rwsem_release() */ __up_read(&brw->rw_sem); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_down_read); int percpu_down_read_trylock(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) { @@ -112,6 +106,7 @@ void percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) if (atomic_dec_and_test(&brw->slow_read_ctr)) wake_up_all(&brw->write_waitq); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_up_read); static int clear_fast_ctr(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) { @@ -126,33 +121,17 @@ static int clear_fast_ctr(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) return sum; } -/* - * A writer increments ->write_ctr to force the readers to switch to the - * slow mode, note the atomic_read() check in update_fast_ctr(). - * - * After that the readers can only inc/dec the slow ->slow_read_ctr counter, - * ->fast_read_ctr is stable. Once the writer moves its sum into the slow - * counter it represents the number of active readers. - * - * Finally the writer takes ->rw_sem for writing and blocks the new readers, - * then waits until the slow counter becomes zero. - */ void percpu_down_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) { - /* tell update_fast_ctr() there is a pending writer */ - atomic_inc(&brw->write_ctr); /* - * 1. Ensures that write_ctr != 0 is visible to any down_read/up_read - * so that update_fast_ctr() can't succeed. - * - * 2. Ensures we see the result of every previous this_cpu_add() in - * update_fast_ctr(). + * Make rcu_sync_is_idle() == F and thus disable the fast-path in + * percpu_down_read() and percpu_up_read(), and wait for gp pass. * - * 3. Ensures that if any reader has exited its critical section via - * fast-path, it executes a full memory barrier before we return. - * See R_W case in the comment above update_fast_ctr(). + * The latter synchronises us with the preceding readers which used + * the fast-past, so we can not miss the result of __this_cpu_add() + * or anything else inside their criticial sections. */ - synchronize_sched_expedited(); + rcu_sync_enter(&brw->rss); /* exclude other writers, and block the new readers completely */ down_write(&brw->rw_sem); @@ -163,16 +142,17 @@ void percpu_down_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) /* wait for all readers to complete their percpu_up_read() */ wait_event(brw->write_waitq, !atomic_read(&brw->slow_read_ctr)); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_down_write); void percpu_up_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) { /* release the lock, but the readers can't use the fast-path */ up_write(&brw->rw_sem); /* - * Insert the barrier before the next fast-path in down_read, - * see W_R case in the comment above update_fast_ctr(). + * Enable the fast-path in percpu_down_read() and percpu_up_read() + * but only after another gp pass; this adds the necessary barrier + * to ensure the reader can't miss the changes done by us. */ - synchronize_sched_expedited(); - /* the last writer unblocks update_fast_ctr() */ - atomic_dec(&brw->write_ctr); + rcu_sync_exit(&brw->rss); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_up_write); diff --git a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c index f17a3e3b3..fec082338 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c +++ b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ void queued_read_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock, u32 cnts) /* * Put the reader into the wait queue */ - arch_spin_lock(&lock->lock); + arch_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); /* * The ACQUIRE semantics of the following spinning code ensure @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ void queued_read_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock, u32 cnts) /* * Signal the next one in queue to become queue head */ - arch_spin_unlock(&lock->lock); + arch_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_read_lock_slowpath); @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ void queued_write_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock) u32 cnts; /* Put the writer into the wait queue */ - arch_spin_lock(&lock->lock); + arch_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); /* Try to acquire the lock directly if no reader is present */ if (!atomic_read(&lock->cnts) && @@ -144,6 +144,6 @@ void queued_write_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock) cpu_relax_lowlatency(); } unlock: - arch_spin_unlock(&lock->lock); + arch_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_write_lock_slowpath); diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h index c8e6e9a59..f0450ff48 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h @@ -267,7 +267,6 @@ static void pv_wait_head(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node) } if (!lp) { /* ONCE */ - WRITE_ONCE(pn->state, vcpu_hashed); lp = pv_hash(lock, pn); /* @@ -275,11 +274,9 @@ static void pv_wait_head(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node) * when we observe _Q_SLOW_VAL in __pv_queued_spin_unlock() * we'll be sure to be able to observe our hash entry. * - * [S] pn->state * [S] <hash> [Rmw] l->locked == _Q_SLOW_VAL * MB RMB * [RmW] l->locked = _Q_SLOW_VAL [L] <unhash> - * [L] pn->state * * Matches the smp_rmb() in __pv_queued_spin_unlock(). */ @@ -364,8 +361,7 @@ __visible void __pv_queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock) * vCPU is harmless other than the additional latency in completing * the unlock. */ - if (READ_ONCE(node->state) == vcpu_hashed) - pv_kick(node->cpu); + pv_kick(node->cpu); } /* * Include the architecture specific callee-save thunk of the diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c index 7781d8012..8251e75dd 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c @@ -74,14 +74,23 @@ static void fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) * set up. */ #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES -# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg(l,c,n) (cmpxchg(&l->owner, c, n) == c) +# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_relaxed(l,c,n) (cmpxchg_relaxed(&l->owner, c, n) == c) +# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(l,c,n) (cmpxchg_acquire(&l->owner, c, n) == c) +# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(l,c,n) (cmpxchg_release(&l->owner, c, n) == c) + +/* + * Callers must hold the ->wait_lock -- which is the whole purpose as we force + * all future threads that attempt to [Rmw] the lock to the slowpath. As such + * relaxed semantics suffice. + */ static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) { unsigned long owner, *p = (unsigned long *) &lock->owner; do { owner = *p; - } while (cmpxchg(p, owner, owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) != owner); + } while (cmpxchg_relaxed(p, owner, + owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) != owner); } /* @@ -121,11 +130,14 @@ static inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex *lock) * lock(wait_lock); * acquire(lock); */ - return rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, owner, NULL); + return rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(lock, owner, NULL); } #else -# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg(l,c,n) (0) +# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_relaxed(l,c,n) (0) +# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(l,c,n) (0) +# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(l,c,n) (0) + static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) { lock->owner = (struct task_struct *) @@ -158,7 +170,8 @@ rt_mutex_waiter_less(struct rt_mutex_waiter *left, * then right waiter has a dl_prio() too. */ if (dl_prio(left->prio)) - return (left->task->dl.deadline < right->task->dl.deadline); + return dl_time_before(left->task->dl.deadline, + right->task->dl.deadline); return 0; } @@ -1321,7 +1334,7 @@ rt_mutex_fastlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk)) { - if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) { + if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current))) { rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current); return 0; } else @@ -1337,7 +1350,7 @@ rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk)) { if (chwalk == RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK && - likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) { + likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current))) { rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current); return 0; } else @@ -1348,7 +1361,7 @@ static inline int rt_mutex_fasttrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock)) { - if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) { + if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current))) { rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current); return 1; } @@ -1362,7 +1375,7 @@ rt_mutex_fastunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, { WAKE_Q(wake_q); - if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, current, NULL))) { + if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(lock, current, NULL))) { rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(current); } else { @@ -1484,7 +1497,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_unlock); bool __sched rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct wake_q_head *wqh) { - if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, current, NULL))) { + if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(lock, current, NULL))) { rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(current); return false; } diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c index 0f189714e..a4d4de05b 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(long count, struct rw_semaphore *sem) * to reduce unnecessary expensive cmpxchg() operations. */ if (count == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS && - cmpxchg(&sem->count, RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, + cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS) == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS) { if (!list_is_singular(&sem->wait_list)) rwsem_atomic_update(RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, sem); @@ -285,7 +285,8 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock_unqueued(struct rw_semaphore *sem) if (!(count == 0 || count == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)) return false; - old = cmpxchg(&sem->count, count, count + RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS); + old = cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, count, + count + RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS); if (old == count) { rwsem_set_owner(sem); return true; |