From 03dd4cb26d967f9588437b0fc9cc0e8353322bb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: André Fabian Silva Delgado Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 03:53:42 -0300 Subject: Linux-libre 4.5-gnu --- drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c') diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c index 9fde60ce8..4d470c1a4 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c @@ -24,9 +24,7 @@ struct lpc32xx_pwm_chip { void __iomem *base; }; -#define PWM_ENABLE (1 << 31) -#define PWM_RELOADV(x) (((x) & 0xFF) << 8) -#define PWM_DUTY(x) ((x) & 0xFF) +#define PWM_ENABLE BIT(31) #define to_lpc32xx_pwm_chip(_chip) \ container_of(_chip, struct lpc32xx_pwm_chip, chip) @@ -38,40 +36,27 @@ static int lpc32xx_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned long long c; int period_cycles, duty_cycles; u32 val; - - c = clk_get_rate(lpc32xx->clk) / 256; - c = c * period_ns; - do_div(c, NSEC_PER_SEC); - - /* Handle high and low extremes */ - if (c == 0) - c = 1; - if (c > 255) - c = 0; /* 0 set division by 256 */ - period_cycles = c; - - /* The duty-cycle value is as follows: - * - * DUTY-CYCLE HIGH LEVEL - * 1 99.9% - * 25 90.0% - * 128 50.0% - * 220 10.0% - * 255 0.1% - * 0 0.0% - * - * In other words, the register value is duty-cycle % 256 with - * duty-cycle in the range 1-256. - */ - c = 256 * duty_ns; - do_div(c, period_ns); - if (c > 255) - c = 255; - duty_cycles = 256 - c; + c = clk_get_rate(lpc32xx->clk); + + /* The highest acceptable divisor is 256, which is represented by 0 */ + period_cycles = div64_u64(c * period_ns, + (unsigned long long)NSEC_PER_SEC * 256); + if (!period_cycles || period_cycles > 256) + return -ERANGE; + if (period_cycles == 256) + period_cycles = 0; + + /* Compute 256 x #duty/period value and care for corner cases */ + duty_cycles = div64_u64((unsigned long long)(period_ns - duty_ns) * 256, + period_ns); + if (!duty_cycles) + duty_cycles = 1; + if (duty_cycles > 255) + duty_cycles = 255; val = readl(lpc32xx->base + (pwm->hwpwm << 2)); val &= ~0xFFFF; - val |= PWM_RELOADV(period_cycles) | PWM_DUTY(duty_cycles); + val |= (period_cycles << 8) | duty_cycles; writel(val, lpc32xx->base + (pwm->hwpwm << 2)); return 0; @@ -83,7 +68,7 @@ static int lpc32xx_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) u32 val; int ret; - ret = clk_enable(lpc32xx->clk); + ret = clk_prepare_enable(lpc32xx->clk); if (ret) return ret; @@ -103,7 +88,7 @@ static void lpc32xx_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) val &= ~PWM_ENABLE; writel(val, lpc32xx->base + (pwm->hwpwm << 2)); - clk_disable(lpc32xx->clk); + clk_disable_unprepare(lpc32xx->clk); } static const struct pwm_ops lpc32xx_pwm_ops = { @@ -134,7 +119,7 @@ static int lpc32xx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) lpc32xx->chip.dev = &pdev->dev; lpc32xx->chip.ops = &lpc32xx_pwm_ops; - lpc32xx->chip.npwm = 2; + lpc32xx->chip.npwm = 1; lpc32xx->chip.base = -1; ret = pwmchip_add(&lpc32xx->chip); -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf