From e5fd91f1ef340da553f7a79da9540c3db711c937 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: André Fabian Silva Delgado Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 01:01:14 -0300 Subject: Linux-libre 4.2-gnu --- fs/tracefs/inode.c | 11 +++-------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/tracefs/inode.c') diff --git a/fs/tracefs/inode.c b/fs/tracefs/inode.c index a43df11a1..cbc8d5d27 100644 --- a/fs/tracefs/inode.c +++ b/fs/tracefs/inode.c @@ -496,16 +496,11 @@ struct dentry *tracefs_create_instance_dir(const char *name, struct dentry *pare return dentry; } -static inline int tracefs_positive(struct dentry *dentry) -{ - return dentry->d_inode && !d_unhashed(dentry); -} - static int __tracefs_remove(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *parent) { int ret = 0; - if (tracefs_positive(dentry)) { + if (simple_positive(dentry)) { if (dentry->d_inode) { dget(dentry); switch (dentry->d_inode->i_mode & S_IFMT) { @@ -582,7 +577,7 @@ void tracefs_remove_recursive(struct dentry *dentry) */ spin_lock(&parent->d_lock); list_for_each_entry(child, &parent->d_subdirs, d_child) { - if (!tracefs_positive(child)) + if (!simple_positive(child)) continue; /* perhaps simple_empty(child) makes more sense */ @@ -603,7 +598,7 @@ void tracefs_remove_recursive(struct dentry *dentry) * from d_subdirs. When releasing the parent->d_lock we can * no longer trust that the next pointer is valid. * Restart the loop. We'll skip this one with the - * tracefs_positive() check. + * simple_positive() check. */ goto loop; } -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf