From 57f0f512b273f60d52568b8c6b77e17f5636edc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: André Fabian Silva Delgado Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 17:04:01 -0300 Subject: Initial import --- kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c | 165 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 165 insertions(+) create mode 100644 kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c (limited to 'kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c') diff --git a/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..652a8ee8e --- /dev/null +++ b/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +int __percpu_init_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw, + const char *name, struct lock_class_key *rwsem_key) +{ + brw->fast_read_ctr = alloc_percpu(int); + if (unlikely(!brw->fast_read_ctr)) + return -ENOMEM; + + /* ->rw_sem represents the whole percpu_rw_semaphore for lockdep */ + __init_rwsem(&brw->rw_sem, name, rwsem_key); + atomic_set(&brw->write_ctr, 0); + atomic_set(&brw->slow_read_ctr, 0); + init_waitqueue_head(&brw->write_waitq); + return 0; +} + +void percpu_free_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) +{ + free_percpu(brw->fast_read_ctr); + brw->fast_read_ctr = NULL; /* catch use after free bugs */ +} + +/* + * This is the fast-path for down_read/up_read, it only needs to ensure + * there is no pending writer (atomic_read(write_ctr) == 0) and inc/dec the + * fast per-cpu counter. The writer uses synchronize_sched_expedited() to + * serialize with the preempt-disabled section below. + * + * The nontrivial part is that we should guarantee acquire/release semantics + * in case when + * + * R_W: down_write() comes after up_read(), the writer should see all + * changes done by the reader + * or + * W_R: down_read() comes after up_write(), the reader should see all + * changes done by the writer + * + * If this helper fails the callers rely on the normal rw_semaphore and + * atomic_dec_and_test(), so in this case we have the necessary barriers. + * + * But if it succeeds we do not have any barriers, atomic_read(write_ctr) or + * __this_cpu_add() below can be reordered with any LOAD/STORE done by the + * reader inside the critical section. See the comments in down_write and + * up_write below. + */ +static bool update_fast_ctr(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw, unsigned int val) +{ + bool success = false; + + preempt_disable(); + if (likely(!atomic_read(&brw->write_ctr))) { + __this_cpu_add(*brw->fast_read_ctr, val); + success = true; + } + preempt_enable(); + + return success; +} + +/* + * Like the normal down_read() this is not recursive, the writer can + * come after the first percpu_down_read() and create the deadlock. + * + * Note: returns with lock_is_held(brw->rw_sem) == T for lockdep, + * percpu_up_read() does rwsem_release(). This pairs with the usage + * of ->rw_sem in percpu_down/up_write(). + */ +void percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) +{ + might_sleep(); + if (likely(update_fast_ctr(brw, +1))) { + rwsem_acquire_read(&brw->rw_sem.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_); + return; + } + + down_read(&brw->rw_sem); + atomic_inc(&brw->slow_read_ctr); + /* avoid up_read()->rwsem_release() */ + __up_read(&brw->rw_sem); +} + +void percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) +{ + rwsem_release(&brw->rw_sem.dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_); + + if (likely(update_fast_ctr(brw, -1))) + return; + + /* false-positive is possible but harmless */ + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&brw->slow_read_ctr)) + wake_up_all(&brw->write_waitq); +} + +static int clear_fast_ctr(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) +{ + unsigned int sum = 0; + int cpu; + + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { + sum += per_cpu(*brw->fast_read_ctr, cpu); + per_cpu(*brw->fast_read_ctr, cpu) = 0; + } + + return sum; +} + +/* + * A writer increments ->write_ctr to force the readers to switch to the + * slow mode, note the atomic_read() check in update_fast_ctr(). + * + * After that the readers can only inc/dec the slow ->slow_read_ctr counter, + * ->fast_read_ctr is stable. Once the writer moves its sum into the slow + * counter it represents the number of active readers. + * + * Finally the writer takes ->rw_sem for writing and blocks the new readers, + * then waits until the slow counter becomes zero. + */ +void percpu_down_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) +{ + /* tell update_fast_ctr() there is a pending writer */ + atomic_inc(&brw->write_ctr); + /* + * 1. Ensures that write_ctr != 0 is visible to any down_read/up_read + * so that update_fast_ctr() can't succeed. + * + * 2. Ensures we see the result of every previous this_cpu_add() in + * update_fast_ctr(). + * + * 3. Ensures that if any reader has exited its critical section via + * fast-path, it executes a full memory barrier before we return. + * See R_W case in the comment above update_fast_ctr(). + */ + synchronize_sched_expedited(); + + /* exclude other writers, and block the new readers completely */ + down_write(&brw->rw_sem); + + /* nobody can use fast_read_ctr, move its sum into slow_read_ctr */ + atomic_add(clear_fast_ctr(brw), &brw->slow_read_ctr); + + /* wait for all readers to complete their percpu_up_read() */ + wait_event(brw->write_waitq, !atomic_read(&brw->slow_read_ctr)); +} + +void percpu_up_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) +{ + /* release the lock, but the readers can't use the fast-path */ + up_write(&brw->rw_sem); + /* + * Insert the barrier before the next fast-path in down_read, + * see W_R case in the comment above update_fast_ctr(). + */ + synchronize_sched_expedited(); + /* the last writer unblocks update_fast_ctr() */ + atomic_dec(&brw->write_ctr); +} -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf