diff options
author | Anthony G. Basile <blueness@gentoo.org> | 2012-12-04 17:50:37 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Anthony G. Basile <blueness@gentoo.org> | 2012-12-04 17:50:37 -0500 |
commit | 3b76e0c84c643df11c7c1dc7204b3817171203ad (patch) | |
tree | a317d196761ac887f2e8733db30e76c12777f1de | |
parent | 2718feb9ed6a65c7e279e3fbdf8fe0c3575d0890 (diff) |
CONTRIBUTING: documentation on how to contribute
Signed-off-by: Anthony G. Basile <blueness@gentoo.org>
-rw-r--r-- | CONTRIBUTING | 165 |
1 files changed, 165 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING b/CONTRIBUTING new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..fb9a9a15a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/CONTRIBUTING @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ + +CONTRIBUTING. + +Please read the following guidelines before contributing. + +1. The basic unit of contribution is a "git commit". This will be merged into +master by one of the team members who will review it and sign-off/commit or +reject it. If the commit is in another branch, it will added to HEAD/master +using + + git cherry-pick -s <tree-ish> + +Or if the commit is submitted as a stand alone file produce by + + git format-patch <tree-ish> + +Then it will be committed by + + git am -s 0001-foo-bar.patch + +Or if the commit is submitted as a github merge request, then the github web +interface can be used. + + + +2. Work in a branch immediately off of master, do not work directly in master, +and do not be afraid of creating a local branch for every experimental thing you +want to try: + + git checkout master # make sure your on master + git branch idea1 # I've got an idea, let me work on it + git checkout idea1 + <hack ... hack ... hack> + git commit -m "step1" # I like what I've done so far, but I'm not finished + <hack ... hack ... hack> + git commit -m "step2" + <hack ... hack ... hack> + git commit -m "step3" + <hack ... hack ... hack> + git revert <tree-ish for step2> # Wow step 2 was dumb + <hack ... hack ... hack> + git commit -m "step4" # Its good now, but those + # commits are messy + + git rebase -i <tree-ish step1>^ # start a rebase on the parent of step1 + (drop into editor and squash commits) # note the ^ at the end! + (exit editor and fix commit message) + +Alternatively, you can cherry-pick those commits into another prestine branch: + + ... its good to go! .... + + git checkout master + git branch idea1-clean + git checkout idea1-clean + git cherry-pick <sha1-of-good-commit1> + git cherry-pick <sha1-of-good-commit2> + (pick them in any order that stacks) + (you can skip commits, but do them in the correct order to avoid conflits) + git rebase -i <tree-ish of sha1-of-good-commit1>^ # squash many commits into one + # note the ^ at the end! + +Once you are done with a local branch you can delete it using + + git branch -D idea1 + +You can delete a remote branch by doing + + git push origin :idea1 + + + +3. Your commit message should conform to the following standard: + + file/changed: Concice and complete statement of the purpose + + This is the body of the commit message. The line above is the + summary. The summary should be no more than 72 chars long. The + body can be more freely formatted, but make it look nice. Make + sure to reference any bug reports and other contributors. Make + sure the correct authorship appears. Reference any early commits + by their full shaw: + + b52c6402b5b42620571c36c74a12dcb45ec1e0d6 + + which you can put on its own line and indent. + + X-Gentoo-Bug: 400837 + X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/400837 + + Reported-by: Snoopy Coderdog <charlie@brown.org> + Signed-off-by: Anthony G. Basile <blueness@gentoo.org> + +If you commit using + + git commit -s + +your sign-off will be automatically added. If the authorship is wrong +fix it by + + git commit -s --author="Richard Feynmann <quantum@electrodynamics.edu>" + +If the message doesn't look right after you commit locally, you can fix it by +doing + + git commit --amend. + +Then push it to your public repo. + + +4. Open an issue at + + https://github.com/gentoo/eudev/issues?state=open + +And request a pull of your clean commit. A team member will review it, +discuss it and commit it to master or reject it. + + +5. eudev is a peer-reviewed project. So even team members must ask another +team member to sign-off and commit your work. The only exception are trivial +commits + + +6. HEAD/master must always build and must always be considered stable. + + +7. Releases should be tagged and signed using + + git tag -s -u <gpg name> -m "Release X" + +where X is the full release number. Make sure that before you release, +you change the value in AC_INIT of configure.ac to match the release +number. + + +8. Tarball releases should be made from HEAD/master at signed tagged points +by doing + + autogen.sh + ./configure --enable-gtk-doc + make + make dist + +TODO: The build system needs to be tweaked so that --enable-gtk-doc is not needed +and one can directly run "make dist" instead of "make; make dist". Make sure +the tarball is correctly named to match the tag. If it isn't you need to +fix configure.ac and retag. + + +9. TODO: coding style for C, python, perl and autotool stuff. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + |