resolved: rename "downgrade-ok" mode to "allow-downgrade"

After discussing this with Tom, we figured out "allow-downgrade" sounds
nicer.

4 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/man/resolved.conf.xml b/man/resolved.conf.xml
index 3c1e698d33..c2c277b606 100644
--- a/man/resolved.conf.xml
+++ b/man/resolved.conf.xml
@@ -143,13 +143,13 @@
       <varlistentry>
         <term><varname>DNSSEC=</varname></term>
         <listitem><para>Takes a boolean argument or
-        <literal>downgrade-ok</literal>. If true all DNS lookups are
+        <literal>allow-downgrade</literal>. If true all DNS lookups are
         DNSSEC-validated locally (excluding LLMNR and Multicast
         DNS). If a response for a lookup request is detected invalid
         this is returned as lookup failure to applications. Note that
         this mode requires a DNS server that supports DNSSEC. If the
         DNS server does not properly support DNSSEC all validations
-        will fail. If set to <literal>downgrade-ok</literal> DNSSEC
+        will fail. If set to <literal>allow-downgrade</literal> DNSSEC
         validation is attempted, but if the server does not support
         DNSSEC properly, DNSSEC mode is automatically disabled. Note
         that this mode makes DNSSEC validation vulnerable to
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
         lookups will fail, as it cannot be proved anymore whether
         lookups are correctly signed, or validly unsigned. If
         <varname>DNSSEC=</varname> is set to
-        <literal>downgrade-ok</literal> the resolver will
+        <literal>allow-downgrade</literal> the resolver will
         automatically turn off DNSSEC validation in such a case.</para>
 
         <para>Client programs looking up DNS data will be informed
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@
         DNSSEC correctly, and where software or trust anchor updates
         happen regularly. On other systems it is recommended to set
         <varname>DNSSEC=</varname> to
-        <literal>downgrade-ok</literal>.</para>
+        <literal>allow-downgrade</literal>.</para>
         </listitem>
       </varlistentry>
 
diff --git a/src/resolve/resolved-dns-dnssec.c b/src/resolve/resolved-dns-dnssec.c
index 32d4834aa1..ff571986c0 100644
--- a/src/resolve/resolved-dns-dnssec.c
+++ b/src/resolve/resolved-dns-dnssec.c
@@ -1568,7 +1568,7 @@ int dnssec_test_nsec(DnsAnswer *answer, DnsResourceKey *key, DnssecNsecResult *r
 
 static const char* const dnssec_mode_table[_DNSSEC_MODE_MAX] = {
         [DNSSEC_NO] = "no",
-        [DNSSEC_DOWNGRADE_OK] = "downgrade-ok",
+        [DNSSEC_ALLOW_DOWNGRADE] = "allow-downgrade",
         [DNSSEC_YES] = "yes",
 };
 DEFINE_STRING_TABLE_LOOKUP(dnssec_mode, DnssecMode);
diff --git a/src/resolve/resolved-dns-dnssec.h b/src/resolve/resolved-dns-dnssec.h
index 94d0b23f80..d818d1a906 100644
--- a/src/resolve/resolved-dns-dnssec.h
+++ b/src/resolve/resolved-dns-dnssec.h
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ enum DnssecMode {
          * DNSSEC properly, downgrade to non-DNSSEC operation. Of
          * course, we then are vulnerable to a downgrade attack, but
          * that's life and what is configured. */
-        DNSSEC_DOWNGRADE_OK,
+        DNSSEC_ALLOW_DOWNGRADE,
 
         /* Insist on DNSSEC server support, and rather fail than downgrading. */
         DNSSEC_YES,
diff --git a/src/resolve/resolved-dns-transaction.c b/src/resolve/resolved-dns-transaction.c
index 870b7586fd..44267c6b2d 100644
--- a/src/resolve/resolved-dns-transaction.c
+++ b/src/resolve/resolved-dns-transaction.c
@@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ static int dns_transaction_prepare(DnsTransaction *t, usec_t ts) {
                          * this means we cannot do any DNSSEC logic
                          * anymore. */
 
-                        if (t->scope->dnssec_mode == DNSSEC_DOWNGRADE_OK) {
+                        if (t->scope->dnssec_mode == DNSSEC_ALLOW_DOWNGRADE) {
                                 /* We are in downgrade mode. In this
                                  * case, synthesize an unsigned empty
                                  * response, so that the any lookup
@@ -2266,7 +2266,7 @@ int dns_transaction_validate_dnssec(DnsTransaction *t) {
 
                                                 dns_server_packet_rrsig_missing(t->server);
 
-                                                if (t->scope->dnssec_mode == DNSSEC_DOWNGRADE_OK) {
+                                                if (t->scope->dnssec_mode == DNSSEC_ALLOW_DOWNGRADE) {
 
                                                         /* Downgrading is OK? If so, just consider the information unsigned */