summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>2016-01-05 22:13:56 +0100
committerLennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>2016-01-05 22:13:56 +0100
commitd33b6cf343f5a1e073c3060878d2cc5fed54d150 (patch)
tree815e916b2e147681b2eb532322703d3bd365c989
parent105f6c4bdcdd9c7233370f1bc143913d5ab0d099 (diff)
resolved: try to detect fritz.box-style private DNS zones, and downgrade to non-DNSSEC mode for them
This adds logic to detect cases like the Fritz!Box routers which serve a private DNS domain "fritz.box" under the TLD "box" that does not exist in the root servers. If this is detected DNSSEC validation is turned off for this private domain, thus improving compatibility with such private DNS zones. This should be fairly secure as we first rely on the proof that .box does not exist before this logic is applied. Nevertheless the logic is only enabled for DNSSEC=allow-downgrade mode. This logic does not work for routers that set up a full DNS zone directly under a non-existing TLD, as in that case we cannot prove that the domain is truly non-existing according to the root servers.
-rw-r--r--man/resolved.conf.xml9
-rw-r--r--src/resolve/resolved-dns-transaction.c93
2 files changed, 102 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/man/resolved.conf.xml b/man/resolved.conf.xml
index 3209f73bc1..5da2d5488e 100644
--- a/man/resolved.conf.xml
+++ b/man/resolved.conf.xml
@@ -203,6 +203,15 @@
setting is in effect, unless it is unset in which case the
global setting is used instead.</para>
+ <para>Site-private DNS zones generally conflict with DNSSEC
+ operation, unless a negative (if the private zone is not
+ signed) or positive (if the private zone is signed) trust
+ anchor is configured for them. If
+ <literal>allow-downgrade</literal> mode is selected, it is
+ attempted to detect site-private DNS zones using top-level
+ domains (TLDs) that are not known by the DNS root server. This
+ logic does not work in all private zone setups.</para>
+
<para>Defaults to off.</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
diff --git a/src/resolve/resolved-dns-transaction.c b/src/resolve/resolved-dns-transaction.c
index 7cf299bac8..7212fb9c4d 100644
--- a/src/resolve/resolved-dns-transaction.c
+++ b/src/resolve/resolved-dns-transaction.c
@@ -1989,6 +1989,66 @@ static int dns_transaction_requires_rrsig(DnsTransaction *t, DnsResourceRecord *
}}
}
+static int dns_transaction_in_private_tld(DnsTransaction *t, const DnsResourceKey *key) {
+ DnsTransaction *dt;
+ const char *tld;
+ Iterator i;
+ int r;
+
+ /* If DNSSEC downgrade mode is on, checks whether the
+ * specified RR is one level below a TLD we have proven not to
+ * exist. In such a case we assume that this is a private
+ * domain, and permit it.
+ *
+ * This detects cases like the Fritz!Box router networks. Each
+ * Fritz!Box router serves a private "fritz.box" zone, in the
+ * non-existing TLD "box". Requests for the "fritz.box" domain
+ * are served by the router itself, while requests for the
+ * "box" domain will result in NXDOMAIN.
+ *
+ * Note that this logic is unable to detect cases where a
+ * router serves a private DNS zone directly under
+ * non-existing TLD. In such a case we cannot detect whether
+ * the TLD is supposed to exist or not, as all requests we
+ * make for it will be answered by the router's zone, and not
+ * by the root zone. */
+
+ assert(t);
+
+ if (t->scope->dnssec_mode != DNSSEC_ALLOW_DOWNGRADE)
+ return false; /* In strict DNSSEC mode what doesn't exist, doesn't exist */
+
+ tld = DNS_RESOURCE_KEY_NAME(key);
+ r = dns_name_parent(&tld);
+ if (r < 0)
+ return r;
+ if (r == 0)
+ return false; /* Already the root domain */
+
+ if (!dns_name_is_single_label(tld))
+ return false;
+
+ SET_FOREACH(dt, t->dnssec_transactions, i) {
+
+ if (dt->key->class != key->class)
+ continue;
+
+ r = dns_name_equal(DNS_RESOURCE_KEY_NAME(dt->key), tld);
+ if (r < 0)
+ return r;
+ if (r == 0)
+ continue;
+
+ /* We found an auxiliary lookup we did for the TLD. If
+ * that returned with NXDOMAIN, we know the TLD didn't
+ * exist, and hence this might be a private zone. */
+
+ return dt->answer_rcode == DNS_RCODE_NXDOMAIN;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
static int dns_transaction_requires_nsec(DnsTransaction *t) {
DnsTransaction *dt;
const char *name;
@@ -2012,6 +2072,18 @@ static int dns_transaction_requires_nsec(DnsTransaction *t) {
if (r > 0)
return false;
+ r = dns_transaction_in_private_tld(t, t->key);
+ if (r < 0)
+ return r;
+ if (r > 0) {
+ /* The lookup is from a TLD that is proven not to
+ * exist, and we are in downgrade mode, hence ignore
+ * that fact that we didn't get any NSEC RRs.*/
+
+ log_info("Detected a negative query %s in a private DNS zone, permitting unsigned response.", dns_transaction_key_string(t));
+ return false;
+ }
+
name = DNS_RESOURCE_KEY_NAME(t->key);
if (IN_SET(t->key->type, DNS_TYPE_SOA, DNS_TYPE_NS, DNS_TYPE_DS)) {
@@ -2283,6 +2355,27 @@ int dns_transaction_validate_dnssec(DnsTransaction *t) {
t->answer_dnssec_result = DNSSEC_INCOMPATIBLE_SERVER;
return 0;
}
+
+ r = dns_transaction_in_private_tld(t, rr->key);
+ if (r < 0)
+ return r;
+ if (r > 0) {
+ _cleanup_free_ char *s = NULL;
+
+ /* The data is from a TLD that is proven not to exist, and we are in downgrade
+ * mode, hence ignore the fact that this was not signed. */
+
+ (void) dns_resource_key_to_string(rr->key, &s);
+ log_info("Detected RRset %s is in a private DNS zone, permitting unsigned RRs.", strna(s ? strstrip(s) : NULL));
+
+ r = dns_answer_move_by_key(&validated, &t->answer, rr->key, 0);
+ if (r < 0)
+ return r;
+
+ t->scope->manager->n_dnssec_insecure++;
+ changed = true;
+ break;
+ }
}
if (IN_SET(result,