tree-wide: check if errno is greater then zero

gcc is confused by the common idiom of
  return errno ? -errno : -ESOMETHING
and thinks a positive value may be returned. Replace this condition
with errno > 0 to help gcc and avoid many spurious warnings. I filed
a gcc rfe a long time ago, but it hard to say if it will ever be
implemented [1].

Both conventions were used in the codebase, this change makes things
more consistent. This is a follow up to bcb161b0230f.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61846

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/src/basic/fileio.c b/src/basic/fileio.c
index 3a237252b5..5ed5460904 100644
--- a/src/basic/fileio.c
+++ b/src/basic/fileio.c
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ int read_one_line_file(const char *fn, char **line) {
         if (!fgets(t, sizeof(t), f)) {
 
                 if (ferror(f))
-                        return errno ? -errno : -EIO;
+                        return errno > 0 ? -errno : -EIO;
 
                 t[0] = 0;
         }
@@ -1064,7 +1064,7 @@ int fflush_and_check(FILE *f) {
         fflush(f);
 
         if (ferror(f))
-                return errno ? -errno : -EIO;
+                return errno > 0 ? -errno : -EIO;
 
         return 0;
 }