tree-wide: check if errno is greater then zero

gcc is confused by the common idiom of
  return errno ? -errno : -ESOMETHING
and thinks a positive value may be returned. Replace this condition
with errno > 0 to help gcc and avoid many spurious warnings. I filed
a gcc rfe a long time ago, but it hard to say if it will ever be
implemented [1].

Both conventions were used in the codebase, this change makes things
more consistent. This is a follow up to bcb161b0230f.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61846

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/src/basic/terminal-util.c b/src/basic/terminal-util.c
index a39764472b..7c9de72bb7 100644
--- a/src/basic/terminal-util.c
+++ b/src/basic/terminal-util.c
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ int read_one_char(FILE *f, char *ret, usec_t t, bool *need_nl) {
 
         errno = 0;
         if (!fgets(line, sizeof(line), f))
-                return errno ? -errno : -EIO;
+                return errno > 0 ? -errno : -EIO;
 
         truncate_nl(line);
 
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ int ask_string(char **ret, const char *text, ...) {
 
                 errno = 0;
                 if (!fgets(line, sizeof(line), stdin))
-                        return errno ? -errno : -EIO;
+                        return errno > 0 ? -errno : -EIO;
 
                 if (!endswith(line, "\n"))
                         putchar('\n');