diff options
author | Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com> | 2012-04-05 08:34:05 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com> | 2012-04-05 11:54:13 +0200 |
commit | 348e27fedfd4cdd2238ff31a46785a70b9dc6fc0 (patch) | |
tree | d6f22a9c3fd626aaa5605d41d59a424d8b91a36d /src/job.c | |
parent | b8217b7bd5fd171916a095b150fad4c3a37f5a41 (diff) |
job: use a lookup table for merging of job types
It is easier to see what job_type_merge() is doing when the merging
rules are written in the form of a table.
job_type_is_superset() contained redundant information. It can be
simplified to a simple rule: Type A is a superset of B iff merging A
with B gives A.
Two job types are conflicting iff they are not mergeable.
Make job_type_lookup_merge() the core function to decide the type
merging. All other job_type_*() are just short wrappers around it.
They can be inline.
test-job-type gives the same results as before.
btw, the systemd binary is smaller by almost 1 KB.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/job.c')
-rw-r--r-- | src/job.c | 123 |
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 88 deletions
@@ -164,100 +164,47 @@ bool job_is_anchor(Job *j) { return false; } -static bool types_match(JobType a, JobType b, JobType c, JobType d) { - return - (a == c && b == d) || - (a == d && b == c); -} - -int job_type_merge(JobType *a, JobType b) { - if (*a == b) - return 0; - - /* Merging is associative! a merged with b merged with c is - * the same as a merged with c merged with b. */ - - /* Mergeability is transitive! if a can be merged with b and b - * with c then a also with c */ - - /* Also, if a merged with b cannot be merged with c, then - * either a or b cannot be merged with c either */ - - if (types_match(*a, b, JOB_START, JOB_VERIFY_ACTIVE)) - *a = JOB_START; - else if (types_match(*a, b, JOB_START, JOB_RELOAD) || - types_match(*a, b, JOB_START, JOB_RELOAD_OR_START) || - types_match(*a, b, JOB_VERIFY_ACTIVE, JOB_RELOAD_OR_START) || - types_match(*a, b, JOB_RELOAD, JOB_RELOAD_OR_START)) - *a = JOB_RELOAD_OR_START; - else if (types_match(*a, b, JOB_START, JOB_RESTART) || - types_match(*a, b, JOB_START, JOB_TRY_RESTART) || - types_match(*a, b, JOB_VERIFY_ACTIVE, JOB_RESTART) || - types_match(*a, b, JOB_RELOAD, JOB_RESTART) || - types_match(*a, b, JOB_RELOAD_OR_START, JOB_RESTART) || - types_match(*a, b, JOB_RELOAD_OR_START, JOB_TRY_RESTART) || - types_match(*a, b, JOB_RESTART, JOB_TRY_RESTART)) - *a = JOB_RESTART; - else if (types_match(*a, b, JOB_VERIFY_ACTIVE, JOB_RELOAD)) - *a = JOB_RELOAD; - else if (types_match(*a, b, JOB_VERIFY_ACTIVE, JOB_TRY_RESTART) || - types_match(*a, b, JOB_RELOAD, JOB_TRY_RESTART)) - *a = JOB_TRY_RESTART; - else - return -EEXIST; - - return 0; -} - -bool job_type_is_mergeable(JobType a, JobType b) { - return job_type_merge(&a, b) >= 0; -} - -bool job_type_is_superset(JobType a, JobType b) { +/* + * Merging is commutative, so imagine the matrix as symmetric. We store only + * its lower triangle to avoid duplication. We don't store the main diagonal, + * because A merged with A is simply A. + * + * Merging is associative! A merged with B merged with C is the same as + * A merged with C merged with B. + * + * Mergeability is transitive! If A can be merged with B and B with C then + * A also with C. + * + * Also, if A merged with B cannot be merged with C, then either A or B cannot + * be merged with C either. + */ +static const JobType job_merging_table[] = { +/* What \ With * JOB_START JOB_VERIFY_ACTIVE JOB_STOP JOB_RELOAD JOB_RELOAD_OR_START JOB_RESTART JOB_TRY_RESTART */ +/************************************************************************************************************************************/ +/*JOB_START */ +/*JOB_VERIFY_ACTIVE */ JOB_START, +/*JOB_STOP */ -1, -1, +/*JOB_RELOAD */ JOB_RELOAD_OR_START, JOB_RELOAD, -1, +/*JOB_RELOAD_OR_START*/ JOB_RELOAD_OR_START, JOB_RELOAD_OR_START, -1, JOB_RELOAD_OR_START, +/*JOB_RESTART */ JOB_RESTART, JOB_RESTART, -1, JOB_RESTART, JOB_RESTART, +/*JOB_TRY_RESTART */ JOB_RESTART, JOB_TRY_RESTART, -1, JOB_TRY_RESTART, JOB_RESTART, JOB_RESTART, +}; - /* Checks whether operation a is a "superset" of b in its - * actions */ +JobType job_type_lookup_merge(JobType a, JobType b) { + assert_cc(ELEMENTSOF(job_merging_table) == _JOB_TYPE_MAX * (_JOB_TYPE_MAX - 1) / 2); + assert(a >= 0 && a < _JOB_TYPE_MAX); + assert(b >= 0 && b < _JOB_TYPE_MAX); if (a == b) - return true; - - switch (a) { - case JOB_START: - return b == JOB_VERIFY_ACTIVE; - - case JOB_RELOAD: - return - b == JOB_VERIFY_ACTIVE; - - case JOB_RELOAD_OR_START: - return - b == JOB_RELOAD || - b == JOB_START || - b == JOB_VERIFY_ACTIVE; - - case JOB_RESTART: - return - b == JOB_START || - b == JOB_VERIFY_ACTIVE || - b == JOB_RELOAD || - b == JOB_RELOAD_OR_START || - b == JOB_TRY_RESTART; - - case JOB_TRY_RESTART: - return - b == JOB_VERIFY_ACTIVE || - b == JOB_RELOAD; - default: - return false; + return a; + if (a < b) { + JobType tmp = a; + a = b; + b = tmp; } -} - -bool job_type_is_conflicting(JobType a, JobType b) { - assert(a >= 0 && a < _JOB_TYPE_MAX); - assert(b >= 0 && b < _JOB_TYPE_MAX); - return (a == JOB_STOP) != (b == JOB_STOP); + return job_merging_table[(a - 1) * a / 2 + b]; } bool job_type_is_redundant(JobType a, UnitActiveState b) { |