rtnl: rename constructors from the form sd_rtnl_xxx_yyy_new() to sd_rtnl_xxx_new_yyy()

So far we followed the rule to always indicate the "flavour" of
constructors after the "_new_" or "_open_" in the function name, so
let's keep things in sync here for rtnl and do the same.

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/rtnl-message.c b/src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/rtnl-message.c
index 625d54a72a..bcfffeff04 100644
--- a/src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/rtnl-message.c
+++ b/src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/rtnl-message.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ int sd_rtnl_message_route_set_dst_prefixlen(sd_rtnl_message *m, unsigned char pr
         return 0;
 }
 
-int sd_rtnl_message_route_new(uint16_t nlmsg_type, unsigned char rtm_family,
+int sd_rtnl_message_new_route(uint16_t nlmsg_type, unsigned char rtm_family,
                               sd_rtnl_message **ret) {
         struct rtmsg *rtm;
         int r;
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ int sd_rtnl_message_link_set_type(sd_rtnl_message *m, unsigned type) {
         return 0;
 }
 
-int sd_rtnl_message_link_new(uint16_t nlmsg_type, int index, sd_rtnl_message **ret) {
+int sd_rtnl_message_new_link(uint16_t nlmsg_type, int index, sd_rtnl_message **ret) {
         struct ifinfomsg *ifi;
         int r;
 
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ int sd_rtnl_message_addr_set_scope(sd_rtnl_message *m, unsigned char scope) {
         return 0;
 }
 
-int sd_rtnl_message_addr_new(uint16_t nlmsg_type, int index, unsigned char family,
+int sd_rtnl_message_new_addr(uint16_t nlmsg_type, int index, unsigned char family,
                              sd_rtnl_message **ret) {
         struct ifaddrmsg *ifa;
         int r;