diff options
author | Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org> | 2014-07-15 17:35:53 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org> | 2014-07-15 17:35:53 +0200 |
commit | 30632d97d9d68c8202e562f34afae8f8d6e9c377 (patch) | |
tree | 6d281c9abc7261a82bc095206765873b9cea8b40 /src/network/networkd-network-gperf.gperf | |
parent | 285cd771cbe275265e165bdb5650b92b31eeab47 (diff) |
rules: uaccess - add ID_SOFTWARE_RADIO
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Alick Zhao <alick9188@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> So maybe ID_SOFTWARE_RADIO ?
>>
>> Hmm, SDR is more a term for a generic technology than for a device
>> class. To me it does not really sound like an administrator would know
>> what this is.
>>
>> What exactly is the device or subsystem you want to make accessible to
>> locally logged-in users only?
>
> Initially it is bladeRF, but many more are of interest: USRP, rtl-sdr,
> HackRF, ... [1]
>
> I agree an administrator might not know what SDR is, since it is
> currently still not widely known, and makes sense only for amateurs
> and researchers. But as a SDR fan, I see many new SDR peripherals
> are created recently, and expect to see more. So a generic ID seems
> reasonable to me.
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_software-defined_radios
Diffstat (limited to 'src/network/networkd-network-gperf.gperf')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions