rtnl: rename constructors from the form sd_rtnl_xxx_yyy_new() to sd_rtnl_xxx_new_yyy()

So far we followed the rule to always indicate the "flavour" of
constructors after the "_new_" or "_open_" in the function name, so
let's keep things in sync here for rtnl and do the same.

4 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/src/network/networkd-address.c b/src/network/networkd-address.c
index 94e7a9cc4b..edae62c802 100644
--- a/src/network/networkd-address.c
+++ b/src/network/networkd-address.c
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ int address_drop(Address *address, Link *link,
         assert(link->manager);
         assert(link->manager->rtnl);
 
-        r = sd_rtnl_message_addr_new(RTM_DELADDR, link->ifindex, address->family, &req);
+        r = sd_rtnl_message_new_addr(RTM_DELADDR, link->ifindex, address->family, &req);
         if (r < 0) {
                 log_error("Could not allocate RTM_DELADDR message: %s",
                           strerror(-r));
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ int address_configure(Address *address, Link *link,
         assert(link->manager);
         assert(link->manager->rtnl);
 
-        r = sd_rtnl_message_addr_new(RTM_NEWADDR, link->ifindex,
+        r = sd_rtnl_message_new_addr(RTM_NEWADDR, link->ifindex,
                         address->family, &req);
         if (r < 0) {
                 log_error("Could not allocate RTM_NEWADDR message: %s",
diff --git a/src/network/networkd-link.c b/src/network/networkd-link.c
index 3ef7622f48..d83c4cef8b 100644
--- a/src/network/networkd-link.c
+++ b/src/network/networkd-link.c
@@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ static int link_set_mtu(Link *link, uint32_t mtu) {
 
         log_debug_link(link, "setting MTU: %" PRIu32, mtu);
 
-        r = sd_rtnl_message_link_new(RTM_SETLINK, link->ifindex, &req);
+        r = sd_rtnl_message_new_link(RTM_SETLINK, link->ifindex, &req);
         if (r < 0) {
                 log_error_link(link, "Could not allocate RTM_SETLINK message");
                 return r;
@@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ static int link_up(Link *link) {
 
         log_debug_link(link, "bringing link up");
 
-        r = sd_rtnl_message_link_new(RTM_SETLINK, link->ifindex, &req);
+        r = sd_rtnl_message_new_link(RTM_SETLINK, link->ifindex, &req);
         if (r < 0) {
                 log_error_link(link, "Could not allocate RTM_SETLINK message");
                 return r;
@@ -959,7 +959,7 @@ static int link_get(Link *link) {
 
         log_debug_link(link, "requesting link status");
 
-        r = sd_rtnl_message_link_new(RTM_GETLINK, link->ifindex, &req);
+        r = sd_rtnl_message_new_link(RTM_GETLINK, link->ifindex, &req);
         if (r < 0) {
                 log_error_link(link, "Could not allocate RTM_GETLINK message");
                 return r;
diff --git a/src/network/networkd-netdev.c b/src/network/networkd-netdev.c
index 8c9fa62501..30eb77d4bc 100644
--- a/src/network/networkd-netdev.c
+++ b/src/network/networkd-netdev.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int netdev_enslave_ready(NetDev *netdev, Link* link, sd_rtnl_message_hand
         assert(link);
         assert(callback);
 
-        r = sd_rtnl_message_link_new(RTM_SETLINK, link->ifindex, &req);
+        r = sd_rtnl_message_new_link(RTM_SETLINK, link->ifindex, &req);
         if (r < 0) {
                 log_error_netdev(netdev,
                                  "Could not allocate RTM_SETLINK message: %s",
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static int netdev_create(NetDev *netdev, Link *link, sd_rtnl_message_handler_t c
         assert(netdev->manager);
         assert(netdev->manager->rtnl);
 
-        r = sd_rtnl_message_link_new(RTM_NEWLINK, 0, &req);
+        r = sd_rtnl_message_new_link(RTM_NEWLINK, 0, &req);
         if (r < 0) {
                 log_error_netdev(netdev,
                                  "Could not allocate RTM_NEWLINK message: %s",
diff --git a/src/network/networkd-route.c b/src/network/networkd-route.c
index 31d4177ca8..098539ed19 100644
--- a/src/network/networkd-route.c
+++ b/src/network/networkd-route.c
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ int route_configure(Route *route, Link *link,
         assert(link->ifindex > 0);
         assert(route->family == AF_INET || route->family == AF_INET6);
 
-        r = sd_rtnl_message_route_new(RTM_NEWROUTE, route->family, &req);
+        r = sd_rtnl_message_new_route(RTM_NEWROUTE, route->family, &req);
         if (r < 0) {
                 log_error("Could not create RTM_NEWROUTE message: %s", strerror(-r));
                 return r;