summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/resolve/resolved-dns-transaction.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>2016-02-22 20:39:45 +0100
committerLennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>2016-02-22 23:24:47 +0100
commit35aa04e9edf422beac3493afa555d29575b3046c (patch)
tree82daef9aac197fd20b341ea3bf255ab7bdc704ac /src/resolve/resolved-dns-transaction.c
parent1a39bc8c650802630696c38e510a4a2a4c6bda92 (diff)
resolved: fix notification iteration logic when transactions are completed
When a transaction is complete, and we notify its owners, make sure we deal correctly with the requesters removing themselves from the list of owners while we continue iterating. This was previously already dealt with with transactions that require other transactions for DNSSEC purposes, fix this for other possibly transaction owners too now. Since iterating through "Set" objects is not safe regarding removal of entries from it, rework the logic to use two Sets, and move each entry we notified from one set to the other set before we dispatch the notification. This move operation requires no additional memory, and enables us to ensure that we don't notify any object twice. Fixes: #2676
Diffstat (limited to 'src/resolve/resolved-dns-transaction.c')
-rw-r--r--src/resolve/resolved-dns-transaction.c62
1 files changed, 30 insertions, 32 deletions
diff --git a/src/resolve/resolved-dns-transaction.c b/src/resolve/resolved-dns-transaction.c
index 3443f71976..1cd5d1be8a 100644
--- a/src/resolve/resolved-dns-transaction.c
+++ b/src/resolve/resolved-dns-transaction.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ static void dns_transaction_flush_dnssec_transactions(DnsTransaction *t) {
while ((z = set_steal_first(t->dnssec_transactions))) {
set_remove(z->notify_transactions, t);
+ set_remove(z->notify_transactions_done, t);
dns_transaction_gc(z);
}
}
@@ -100,14 +101,26 @@ DnsTransaction* dns_transaction_free(DnsTransaction *t) {
set_remove(c->transactions, t);
set_free(t->notify_query_candidates);
+ while ((c = set_steal_first(t->notify_query_candidates_done)))
+ set_remove(c->transactions, t);
+ set_free(t->notify_query_candidates_done);
+
while ((i = set_steal_first(t->notify_zone_items)))
i->probe_transaction = NULL;
set_free(t->notify_zone_items);
+ while ((i = set_steal_first(t->notify_zone_items_done)))
+ i->probe_transaction = NULL;
+ set_free(t->notify_zone_items_done);
+
while ((z = set_steal_first(t->notify_transactions)))
set_remove(z->dnssec_transactions, t);
set_free(t->notify_transactions);
+ while ((z = set_steal_first(t->notify_transactions_done)))
+ set_remove(z->dnssec_transactions, t);
+ set_free(t->notify_transactions_done);
+
dns_transaction_flush_dnssec_transactions(t);
set_free(t->dnssec_transactions);
@@ -127,8 +140,11 @@ bool dns_transaction_gc(DnsTransaction *t) {
return true;
if (set_isempty(t->notify_query_candidates) &&
+ set_isempty(t->notify_query_candidates_done) &&
set_isempty(t->notify_zone_items) &&
- set_isempty(t->notify_transactions)) {
+ set_isempty(t->notify_zone_items_done) &&
+ set_isempty(t->notify_transactions) &&
+ set_isempty(t->notify_transactions_done)) {
dns_transaction_free(t);
return false;
}
@@ -266,6 +282,7 @@ static void dns_transaction_tentative(DnsTransaction *t, DnsPacket *p) {
log_debug("We have the lexicographically larger IP address and thus lost in the conflict.");
t->block_gc++;
+
while ((z = set_first(t->notify_zone_items))) {
/* First, make sure the zone item drops the reference
* to us */
@@ -284,7 +301,6 @@ void dns_transaction_complete(DnsTransaction *t, DnsTransactionState state) {
DnsQueryCandidate *c;
DnsZoneItem *z;
DnsTransaction *d;
- Iterator i;
const char *st;
char key_str[DNS_RESOURCE_KEY_STRING_MAX];
@@ -333,39 +349,17 @@ void dns_transaction_complete(DnsTransaction *t, DnsTransactionState state) {
* transaction isn't freed while we are still looking at it */
t->block_gc++;
- SET_FOREACH(c, t->notify_query_candidates, i)
+ SET_FOREACH_MOVE(c, t->notify_query_candidates_done, t->notify_query_candidates)
dns_query_candidate_notify(c);
- SET_FOREACH(z, t->notify_zone_items, i)
- dns_zone_item_notify(z);
+ SWAP_TWO(t->notify_query_candidates, t->notify_query_candidates_done);
- if (!set_isempty(t->notify_transactions)) {
- DnsTransaction **nt;
- unsigned j, n = 0;
-
- /* We need to be careful when notifying other
- * transactions, as that might destroy other
- * transactions in our list. Hence, in order to be
- * able to safely iterate through the list of
- * transactions, take a GC lock on all of them
- * first. Then, in a second loop, notify them, but
- * first unlock that specific transaction. */
-
- nt = newa(DnsTransaction*, set_size(t->notify_transactions));
- SET_FOREACH(d, t->notify_transactions, i) {
- nt[n++] = d;
- d->block_gc++;
- }
-
- assert(n == set_size(t->notify_transactions));
+ SET_FOREACH_MOVE(z, t->notify_zone_items_done, t->notify_zone_items)
+ dns_zone_item_notify(z);
+ SWAP_TWO(t->notify_zone_items, t->notify_zone_items_done);
- for (j = 0; j < n; j++) {
- if (set_contains(t->notify_transactions, nt[j]))
- dns_transaction_notify(nt[j], t);
-
- nt[j]->block_gc--;
- dns_transaction_gc(nt[j]);
- }
- }
+ SET_FOREACH_MOVE(d, t->notify_transactions_done, t->notify_transactions)
+ dns_transaction_notify(d, t);
+ SWAP_TWO(t->notify_transactions, t->notify_transactions_done);
t->block_gc--;
dns_transaction_gc(t);
@@ -1626,6 +1620,10 @@ static int dns_transaction_add_dnssec_transaction(DnsTransaction *t, DnsResource
if (r < 0)
goto gc;
+ r = set_ensure_allocated(&aux->notify_transactions_done, NULL);
+ if (r < 0)
+ goto gc;
+
r = set_put(t->dnssec_transactions, aux);
if (r < 0)
goto gc;