resolved: tighten search for NSEC3 RRs a bit

Be stricter when searching suitable NSEC3 RRs for proof: generalize the
check we use to find suitable NSEC3 RRs, in nsec3_is_good(), and add
additional checks, such as checking whether all NSEC3 RRs use the same
parameters, have the same suffix and so on.

1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/src/shared/dns-domain.c b/src/shared/dns-domain.c
index f3dbf60395..f44e80c9db 100644
--- a/src/shared/dns-domain.c
+++ b/src/shared/dns-domain.c
@@ -1215,3 +1215,21 @@ int dns_name_count_labels(const char *name) {
 
         return (int) n;
 }
+
+int dns_name_equal_skip(const char *a, unsigned n_labels, const char *b) {
+        int r;
+
+        assert(a);
+        assert(b);
+
+        while (n_labels > 0) {
+
+                r = dns_name_parent(&a);
+                if (r <= 0)
+                        return r;
+
+                n_labels --;
+        }
+
+        return dns_name_equal(a, b);
+}