[PATCH] udevd - allow to bypass sequence number

This patch allows udevsend to be called by the user and not only by the
kernel with its SEQNUM. If no SEQNUM is given, we move the event straight
to the exec queue and don't look if something is missing.

I don't know if this is really needed, but some people seem trying to
send events trough udevd instead of calling udev directly with their
scripts and confuse the reorder logic with that.

So at least, we may remove this source of confusion and udevsend is much
much faster back than udev itself and it will also block concurrent events
for the same devpath.

1 files changed, 19 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/udevd.c b/udevd.c
index 331b7e4b84..f8b8c27ee4 100644
--- a/udevd.c
+++ b/udevd.c
@@ -205,16 +205,20 @@ static void *exec_queue_manager(void * parm)
 	}
 }
 
-/* move message from incoming to exec queue */
-static void msg_move_exec(struct list_head *head)
+static void exec_queue_activate(void)
 {
-	list_move_tail(head, &exec_list);
-	/* signal queue activity to manager */
 	pthread_mutex_lock(&exec_active_lock);
 	pthread_cond_signal(&exec_active);
 	pthread_mutex_unlock(&exec_active_lock);
 }
 
+/* move message from incoming to exec queue */
+static void msg_move_exec(struct list_head *head)
+{
+	list_move_tail(head, &exec_list);
+	exec_queue_activate();
+}
+
 /* queue management thread handles the timeouts and dispatches the events */
 static void *msg_queue_manager(void * parm)
 {
@@ -298,9 +302,17 @@ static void *client_threads(void * parm)
 		goto exit;
 	}
 
-	pthread_mutex_lock(&msg_lock);
-	msg_queue_insert(msg);
-	pthread_mutex_unlock(&msg_lock);
+	/* if no seqnum is given, we move straight to exec queue */
+	if (msg->seqnum == 0) {
+		pthread_mutex_lock(&exec_lock);
+		list_add(&msg->list, &exec_list);
+		exec_queue_activate();
+		pthread_mutex_unlock(&exec_lock);
+	} else {
+		pthread_mutex_lock(&msg_lock);
+		msg_queue_insert(msg);
+		pthread_mutex_unlock(&msg_lock);
+	}
 
 exit:
 	close(sock);