diff options
author | Will Woods <wwoods@redhat.com> | 2014-04-25 18:26:34 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net> | 2014-05-16 20:09:02 +0200 |
commit | 68d3acaccbd26ecfbc5881fea75968fa4abcc565 (patch) | |
tree | da9c2901bf7debb72a4af6f3e2fbb0f32b6530a4 /units/systemd-update-utmp-runlevel.service.in | |
parent | d36d90933a832bd1e1eb8e3d16b3de73f91636b4 (diff) |
core: let selinux_setup() load policy more than once
When you switch-root into a new root that has SELinux policy, you're
supposed to to run selinux_init_load_policy() to set up SELinux and load
policy. Normally this gets handled by selinux_setup().
But if SELinux was already initialized, selinux_setup() skips loading
policy and returns 0. So if you load policy normally, and then you
switch-root to a new root that has new policy, selinux_setup() never
loads the new policy. What gives?
As far as I can tell, this check is an artifact of how selinux_setup()
worked when it was first written (see commit c4dcdb9 / systemd v12):
* when systemd starts, run selinux_setup()
* if selinux_setup() loads policy OK, restart systemd
So the "if policy already loaded, skip load and return 0" check was
there to prevent an infinite re-exec loop.
Modern systemd only calls selinux_setup() on initial load and after
switch-root, and selinux_setup() no longer restarts systemd, so we don't
need that check to guard against the infinite loop anymore.
So: this patch removes the "return 0", thus allowing selinux_setup() to
actually perform SELinux setup after switch-root.
We still want to check to see if SELinux is initialized, because if
selinux_init_load_policy() fails *but* SELinux is initialized that means
we still have (old) policy active. So we don't need to halt if
enforce=1.
Diffstat (limited to 'units/systemd-update-utmp-runlevel.service.in')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions