diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/core')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/core/socket.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/core/socket.c b/src/core/socket.c index d3d4866fe6..4fc66af0b8 100644 --- a/src/core/socket.c +++ b/src/core/socket.c @@ -100,7 +100,8 @@ static void socket_init(Unit *u) { s->control_command_id = _SOCKET_EXEC_COMMAND_INVALID; - RATELIMIT_INIT(s->trigger_limit, 5*USEC_PER_SEC, 2500); + s->trigger_limit.interval = USEC_INFINITY; + s->trigger_limit.burst = (unsigned) -1; } static void socket_unwatch_control_pid(Socket *s) { @@ -328,6 +329,25 @@ static int socket_add_extras(Socket *s) { assert(s); + /* Pick defaults for the trigger limit, if nothing was explicitly configured. We pick a relatively high limit + * in Accept=yes mode, and a lower limit for Accept=no. Reason: in Accept=yes mode we are invoking accept() + * ourselves before the trigger limit can hit, thus incoming connections are taken off the socket queue quickly + * and reliably. This is different for Accept=no, where the spawned service has to take the incoming traffic + * off the queues, which it might not necessarily do. Moreover, while Accept=no services are supposed to + * process whatever is queued in one go, and thus should normally never have to be started frequently. This is + * different for Accept=yes where each connection is processed by a new service instance, and thus frequent + * service starts are typical. */ + + if (s->trigger_limit.interval == USEC_INFINITY) + s->trigger_limit.interval = 2 * USEC_PER_SEC; + + if (s->trigger_limit.burst == (unsigned) -1) { + if (s->accept) + s->trigger_limit.burst = 200; + else + s->trigger_limit.burst = 20; + } + if (have_non_accept_socket(s)) { if (!UNIT_DEREF(s->service)) { |