| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
context.
This patch does the dbus calls correctly.
|
|
Use cases:
* iptables.service – atomically reload rules without having to flush
them beforehand (which may leave the system insecure if reload fails)
* rpc-nfsd.service – reexport filesystems after /etc/exports update
without completely stopping and restarting nfsd
(In both cases, the actual service is provided by a kernel module and
does not have any associated user-space processes, thus Type=oneshot.)
|
|
AC_CHECK_FUNCS may be successful, even though name_to_handle_at and
'struct file_handle' are not available.
|
|
|
|
From now on, always use ANSI-SQL-style comments in log streams, i.e.
prefix with --. We also suffix things with this, just to be nice...
|
|
|
|
|
|
As you likely know, Arch Linux is in the process of moving to systemd.
So I was reading through the various systemd docs and quickly became
baffled by this new abbreviation "resp.", which I've never seen before
in my English-mother-tongue life.
Some quick Googling turned up a reference:
<http://www.transblawg.eu/index.php?/archives/870-Resp.-and-other-non-existent-English-wordsNicht-existente-englische-Woerter.html>
I guess it's a literal translation of the German "Beziehungsweise", but
English doesn't work the same way. The word "respectively" is used
exclusively to provide an ordering connection between two lists. E.g.
"the prefixes k, M, and G refer to kilo-, mega-, and giga-,
respectively." It is also never abbreviated to "resp." So the sentence
"Sets the default output resp. error output for all services and
sockets" makes no sense to a natural English speaker.
This patch removes all instances of "resp." in the man pages and
replaces them with sentences which are much more clear and, hopefully,
grammatically valid. In almost all instances, it was simply replacing
"resp." with "or," which the original author (Lennart?) could probably
just do in the future.
The only other instances of "resp." are in the src/ subtree, which I
don't feel privileged to correct.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Eikum <aeikum@codeweavers.com>
|
|
|
|
systemctl enable, disable, ... can also accept full path and in this case
we don't need to alter it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866346
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stopped working after cfbc22ab 'journalctl: implement --since= and
--until for filtering by time'.
|
|
When compiling without gcrypt, gcc emits an annoying warning.
|
|
./src/journal/journald.h:123:114: warning: ‘struct ucred’ declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valgrind says:
==29176== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==29176== at 0x412A85: cunescape_length_with_prefix (util.c:1565)
==29176== by 0x40B351: dev_kmsg_record (journald-kmsg.c:301)
==29176== by 0x40B653: server_read_dev_kmsg (journald-kmsg.c:347)
==29176== by 0x40B701: server_flush_dev_kmsg (journald-kmsg.c:365)
==29176== by 0x409DE7: main (journald.c:1535)
|
|
|
|
The MESSAGE_ID=... stanza will appear in countless number of places.
It is just too long to write it out in full each time.
Incidentally, this also fixes a typo of MESSSAGE is three places.
|
|
|
|
Add support for scm block devices. Introduced here:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=f30664e2
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
|
|
Commits 5e9eb156c and 32567f8 introduced persistent symlinks for input devices
with more than one interface. However, this does not ensure stability for the
"default" interface, i. e. with interface number 00 or a nonexisting one. If a
device with a higher interface number appears first, it'll claim the symlink
name without an interface number, and the "interface 00" device won't get any.
Fix this by creating the default symlink only for interface 00 or a nonexisting
one, so that we properly partition the two cases over the two rules.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1057824
|
|
text/event-stream
|
|
|
|
|
|
the current position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to show their details
|
|
we had this mostly for debugging purposes and it was ignored when
parsing anyway, so let's get rid of it
|
|
|
|
According to Linux drivers/input/evdev.c, scan codes are unsigned, not int nor
uint32_t.
Thanks to Dejan Tosovic <dejan@post.com> for reporting this!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it exists, not one after it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
