| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 20:08, Robert Love wrote:
> Ack, I did not even see that! Thanks.
>
> Let's rip that out, and always use the new built-in logic to determine
> what initscript to install.
Hm, looks like we do not need the %{lsb} and USE_LSB logic at all,
anymore.
Here is the patch, updated, removing both completely.
|
|
I promise, that I will not take every item you put in the TODO list :)
|
|
|
|
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:26:37PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 12:45:38AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >
> > Here a few questions about my favorite file in the tree :)
> > - better permission handling
> >
> > What is missing here?
>
> I don't know for sure. Just a vague feeling that the way we currently
> handle permissions is pretty lousy. Anyone else feel this way too?
Seems that nobody cares and perhaps the recent klibc permission changes
and the multiple file config directory are enough to kill these lines? :)
|
|
We want to be started by keventd, as that runs at a very fast priority.
|
|
|
|
Make TODO really small :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks to Kay for pointing it out to me.
|
|
As usual, when the stuff gets in the tree - here is a small
man page update and a TODO line removal.
mention multiple symlinks
update example with silly symlink rule :)
shorten example line to have less than 80 chars
remove "want symlink support" from TODO
|
|
Attached is a patch against udev-008 to send out a D-BUS message when a
device node is added or removed.
Using D-BUS lingo, udev acquires the org.kernel.udev service and sends
out a NodeCreated or NodeDeleted signal on the
org.kernel.udev.NodeMonitor interface. Each signal carries two
parameters: the node in question and the corresponding sysfs path.
[Note: the D-BUS concepts of service, interface, object can be a bit
confusing at first glance]
An example program listening for these messages looks like this
#!/usr/bin/python
import dbus
import gtk
def udev_signal_received(dbus_iface, member, service, object_path, message):
[filename, sysfs_path] = message.get_args_list()
if member=='NodeCreated':
print 'Node %s created for %s'%(filename, sysfs_path)
elif member=='NodeDeleted':
print 'Node %s deleted for %s'%(filename, sysfs_path)
def main():
bus = dbus.Bus(dbus.Bus.TYPE_SYSTEM)
bus.add_signal_receiver(udev_signal_received,
'org.kernel.udev.NodeMonitor', # interface
'org.kernel.udev', # service
'/org/kernel/udev/NodeMonitor') # object
gtk.mainloop()
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
and this is the output when hot-plugging some usb-storage.
[david@laptop udev-008]$ ~/node_monitor.py
Node /udev/sda created for /block/sda
Node /udev/sda1 created for /block/sda/sda1
Node /udev/sda1 deleted for /block/sda/sda1
Node /udev/sda deleted for /block/sda
The patch requires D-BUS 0.20 or later while the python example program
requires D-BUS from CVS as I only recently applied a patch against the
python bindings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks to reg@dwf.com for pointing this out to me.
|
|
|
