summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/TODO
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2005-04-26[PATCH] add new TODO item about local user permissions.greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] TODO updatekay.sievers@vrfy.org
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:26:37PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 12:45:38AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > > > > Here a few questions about my favorite file in the tree :) > > - better permission handling > > > > What is missing here? > > I don't know for sure. Just a vague feeling that the way we currently > handle permissions is pretty lousy. Anyone else feel this way too? Seems that nobody cares and perhaps the recent klibc permission changes and the multiple file config directory are enough to kill these lines? :)
2005-04-26[PATCH] remove udevd priority TODO item, as it's not needed at all.greg@kroah.com
We want to be started by keventd, as that runs at a very fast priority.
2005-04-26[PATCH] add udevd priority issue to the TODO list.greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] udev - TODO updatekay.sievers@vrfy.org
Make TODO really small :)
2005-04-26[PATCH] remove TODO item about BUS value, as it is now done.greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] update TODO with some new, small items.greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] remove unneeded TODO and FIXME entrygreg@kroah.com
Thanks to Kay for pointing it out to me.
2005-04-26[PATCH] man-page mention multiple symlinkskay.sievers@vrfy.org
As usual, when the stuff gets in the tree - here is a small man page update and a TODO line removal. mention multiple symlinks update example with silly symlink rule :) shorten example line to have less than 80 chars remove "want symlink support" from TODO
2005-04-26[PATCH] D-BUS patch for udev-008david@fubar.dk
Attached is a patch against udev-008 to send out a D-BUS message when a device node is added or removed. Using D-BUS lingo, udev acquires the org.kernel.udev service and sends out a NodeCreated or NodeDeleted signal on the org.kernel.udev.NodeMonitor interface. Each signal carries two parameters: the node in question and the corresponding sysfs path. [Note: the D-BUS concepts of service, interface, object can be a bit confusing at first glance] An example program listening for these messages looks like this #!/usr/bin/python import dbus import gtk def udev_signal_received(dbus_iface, member, service, object_path, message): [filename, sysfs_path] = message.get_args_list() if member=='NodeCreated': print 'Node %s created for %s'%(filename, sysfs_path) elif member=='NodeDeleted': print 'Node %s deleted for %s'%(filename, sysfs_path) def main(): bus = dbus.Bus(dbus.Bus.TYPE_SYSTEM) bus.add_signal_receiver(udev_signal_received, 'org.kernel.udev.NodeMonitor', # interface 'org.kernel.udev', # service '/org/kernel/udev/NodeMonitor') # object gtk.mainloop() if __name__ == '__main__': main() and this is the output when hot-plugging some usb-storage. [david@laptop udev-008]$ ~/node_monitor.py Node /udev/sda created for /block/sda Node /udev/sda1 created for /block/sda/sda1 Node /udev/sda1 deleted for /block/sda/sda1 Node /udev/sda deleted for /block/sda The patch requires D-BUS 0.20 or later while the python example program requires D-BUS from CVS as I only recently applied a patch against the python bindings.
2005-04-26[PATCH] remove some items off of the TODO list, as they are now done.greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] update the TODO list with more items that people can easily do.greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] Remove a few items from the TODO list that are already done.greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] add BUS= bug to TODO list so it will not get forgotten.greg@kroah.com
Thanks to reg@dwf.com for pointing this out to me.
2005-04-26[PATCH] TODO updatesgreg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] updated the TODO list.greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] added 0.2 change log info.udev/v002greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] added more documentation in README and TODO files.greg@kroah.com