Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Many statements in this document are no longer correct, or even
suggest things we do not want to support, or do not work at all
with the current version of udev.
Any new documentation should better be added to the udev man page,
which is usually kept up-to-date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of using multiple recursive Makefile.am files, use a single
Makefile.am that sets and builds all the basic suite of libraries and
binaries for udev. This reduces the number of files in the source tree, and
also reduces drastically the build time when using parallel-make.
With this setup, all the compile steps will be executed in parallel, and
just the linking stage will be (partially) serialised on the libraries
creation.
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This was pointed out by SG Wilkinson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
We never used any of the libsysfs convenience features. Here we replace
it completely with 300 lines of code, which are much simpler and a bit
faster cause udev(d) does not open any syfs file for a simple event which
does not need any parent device information.
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
Thanks to Frans Pop for the "patch".
|
|
Simple %e enumerations never worked reliably outside of udevstart and
udevstart is no longer recommended to use.
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
All udev state is kept in /$udev_root/.udev/ now. No option to
configure that anymore, it will always be there.
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
The troff man pages will still be checked into the tree but the
source is DocBook XML format living in the docs/ directory now.
Start with the easy ones, the main udev page is still left to
rewrite.
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
The distro rules are the best example you can get and the use of
dev.d/ is no longer recommended.
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
|
|
From Masanao Igarashi <masayuko@alpha.ocn.ne.jp>
|
|
Here's a long overdue update to the udev rules docs, based on lots of user
feedback from the last few months.
Mostly updates to keep up with the new udev features, some clarifications and
wording improvements. I added a section on rules for palm pilots due to the
excessive amount of mail I get about them. I removed the nvidia stuff because
it's out of date. Added another section about debugging using logs and
udevtest. Removed the thanks list because I haven't been updating it and there
are too many people to name now, sorry..!
|
|
|
|
This makes the udev operation completely lockless by storing a
file for every node in /dev/.udevdb/* This solved the problem
with deadlocking concurrent udev processes waiting for each other
to release the file lock under heavy load.
|
|
Here's an update to the documentation. It makes a few minor corrections and
adds info about multiple-symlinks.
It also seems that the patch I sent on April 27th (patching v0.53 to 0.54) was
not applied, so this patch includes that update too, which was also just some
small corrections plus added info on renaming network devices.
|
|
|
|
Here's an update for the writing udev rules document.
- Minor corrections/clarifications
- Added info about using NAME{all_partitions}
- Added more info about udevinfo, simplifying the rule-writing process
You can ignore the diff I sent you yesterday - according to the 20040415 bk
snapshot on codemonkey.org, you haven't applied it yet. This patch
incorporates that update, and some other changes I just made.
|
|
<dan@reactivated.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|