summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/namedev_parse.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2005-04-26[PATCH] remove typedef for call_foreach_file() handler functionkay.sievers@vrfy.org
2005-04-26[PATCH] rename attributes to optionskay.sievers@vrfy.org
2005-04-26[PATCH] namedev: skip backslashes only if followed by newlinekay.sievers@vrfy.org
Fix from: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> namedev_parse is a bit overzealous when in comes to handling backspaces; it always eats up backspaces regardless of anything beyond that. This means it is impossible to enter '\t' in a rule. Quite a bit of fun when you're trying to write regexps.
2005-04-26[PATCH] detect NAME="" as ignore_device rulekay.sievers@vrfy.org
2005-04-26[PATCH] trivial namedev cleanupkay.sievers@vrfy.org
2005-04-26[PATCH] introduce OPTIONS=ignore_device, ignore_remove, all_partitions" keykay.sievers@vrfy.org
Here we move all possible options into a own key to make it possible to have options-only rules. The options on the NAME key are removed from the man page and will be removed from a future version of udev. For ignore rules, OPTIONS="ignore" should be used. The rule: SUBSYSTEM="block", SYSFS{removable}="1", OPTIONS="all_partitions" will create all partitions for a block device which is known to have removable media (a check for cdrom drives would be needed too).
2005-04-26[PATCH] create /block/*/range count of partitons for all_partitionskay.sievers@vrfy.org
2005-04-26[PATCH] fix -Wsign-compare warningskay.sievers@vrfy.org
2005-04-26[PATCH] allow multiline rules by backslash at the end of the linekay.sievers@vrfy.org
On Sun, 2004-12-19 at 18:31 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > On Dec 19, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> wrote: > > > (Feature request: would it be possible to extend the rules files parser > > to support continuation lines? I'd like it to consider lines starting > > with white space as part of the previous line.) > > How about the usual backslash at the end of the line. Here is a simple > patch.
2005-04-26[PATCH] complete removal of explicit udev permissions config filekay.sievers@vrfy.org
2005-04-26[PATCH] simplify permission handlingkay.sievers@vrfy.org
Initialize the defaults in udev_config.c instead of namedev.c. Replace macro by expanded code. Switch to mode_t instead of string value. Add and clarify some comments.
2005-04-26[PATCH] rename udev_lib to udev_utils and dev_d to udev_multiplexkay.sievers@vrfy.org
2005-04-26[PATCH] add NAME{ignore_remove} attributekay.sievers@vrfy.org
Some broken ide drivers are generating high event traffic, with add/remove events. With this attribute, it can be specified, that the node is always available. It may be used in conjunction with the new DRIVER= match to catch specific kernel device drivers.
2005-04-26[PATCH] remove historical SYSFS_attr="value" formatkay.sievers@vrfy.org
This is long ago replaced by the unified key attribute format SYSFS{attr}="value".
2005-04-26[PATCH] support DRIVER as a rule keykay.sievers@vrfy.org
Match with a rule against a device with a specific kernel driver.
2005-04-26[PATCH] support SUBSYSTEM as a rule keykay.sievers@vrfy.org
This should make it easier to catch e.g all block or net devices with a single rule.
2005-04-26[PATCH] make the udev object available to more processing stageskay.sievers@vrfy.org
Remove the overwriting of main_argv[] hack and use the values from the udev object. Pass the udev object to call_foreach_file(). In the udevstart case, export SUBSYSTEM and UDEVSTART to the environment.
2005-04-26[PATCH] sparse cleanups on the treegreg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] fix udev segfaults with bad permissions filekay.sievers@vrfy.org
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 02:53:12PM +0200, Loleslaw wrote: > Hi, > Since I started using udev-031 on my gentoo udevstart would just segfault > (udev-030 worked). As it turned out I had a file in /etc/udev/permissions.d > with a single space in one line. I've cleaned the file and it works all > right, but I thought you could be interested. > I've traced it to function namedev_init_permissions in namedev_parse.c > I don't know C well enough to suggest a patch. Yeah, thanks for pointing that out. It only happens if the file ends with whitespace-only lines. Here is a fix and a test for udev-test.pl to cover that case.
2005-04-26[PATCH] udev - read long lines from config files overflow fixarun@codemovers.org
Hi Kay, On 23:12 Sat 04 Sep , Kay Sievers wrote: > Cool, a real bug :) > Thanks, for the patch. I think it would be better to skip lenghth exceeding > lines instead of cutting it and continue. While looking at it I restructured > the buffer reading logic a bit and fixed another stupid bug. Thanks for the cleanup. You may have overlooked the fix for udev_config.c(parsing udev.conf) in your patch. So, I've adapted the fixes you applied to namedev_parse.c to this file also. Also, while 'eating' the whitespace the 'count' doesn't get decremented. This leads strncpy to copy the number of whitespace minus 1 characters from the next line. Minus 1 because it copies '\n' from the current line. while (isspace(bufline[0])) { bufline++; + count--; } . . . strncpy(line, bufline, count); Included patch(against udev-030) contains the above fixes as well as your fixes. Signed-off-by: Arun Bhanu <arun@codemovers.org>
2005-04-26[PATCH] dev_d.c file sorting and cleanupkay.sievers@vrfy.org
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 02:52:13AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > Please have look if it still works for you, I only did a very quick > test. Here is a unified version, with all the functions moved to udev_lib.c. We have a generic function now, to call a given fnct(char *) for every file ending with a specific suffix, sorted in lexical order. We use it to execute the dev.d/ files and read our rules.d/ files. The binary should be a bit smaller now. I've also changed it, to not do the dev.d/ exec for net devices.
2005-04-26[PATCH] replace fgets() with mmap() and introduce udev_lib.[hc]kay.sievers@vrfy.org
Here we replace the various fgets() with a mmap() call for the config file reading, due to the reported performance problems with klibc. Thanks to Patrick's testing, it makes a very small, close to nothing speed gain for libc users, but a 6 times speed increase for klibc users with a 1000 line config file. I've created a udev_lib.[hc] for this and also moved all the generic stuff from udev.h in there and uninlined the functions.
2005-04-26[PATCH] remove extra ; in namedev_parse.cgreg@kroah.com
Thanks to Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de> for pointing this out.
2005-04-26[PATCH] allow to specify node permissions in the rulekay.sievers@vrfy.org
This allows to set the permissions along with the rule. This is not a general replacement for the permissions config, but it may be easier sometimes for the user to specify the permissions along with the rule, cause the permissions config file wants the final node name to match, which seems sometimes a bit difficult to guess, if format % chars are used in the NAME field. Any value not given in the rule is still be read from the permissions file or set to the default. This one will also work: BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", NAME="my-%k", OWNER="$local" A few words to man page are also added and add_perm_dev() is moved into namedev_parse.c where it belongs to.
2005-04-26[PATCH] overall trivial trivial cleanupkay.sievers@vrfy.org
Here I try to make the style a bit more consistant in the different files, so that new patches just copy the 'right' one :) Some "magic" numbers are replaced and udevtest.c is catched up with udev.
2005-04-26[PATCH] udev - fix debug info for multiple rule file configkay.sievers@vrfy.org
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 09:56:32PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > Andrey pointed out that we don't print the right filename in the debug > output. Here is a fix for that. It applies on top of Andrey's symlink > patch, cause we are touching the same part of the code. The copy/paste devil catched me :) Here is a fixed one.
2005-04-26[PATCH] udev - safer string handling all over the placekay.sievers@vrfy.org
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 11:50:52PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > Here is the first step towards a safer string handling. > More will follow, but for now only the easy ones :) > > Thanks to all who pointed this out. strncat() isn't a nice function. We > all should remember that the destination string is not terminated if the > given lenght is shorter than the strlen of the source string. > > And shame on the various implementers of strfieldcat() I found in the > unapplied patches on this list, it's not really better than strncpy() > and hides the real problem. Hmm, bk didn't checked in one file, maybe I edited it again as root. Nevermind, here is the more complete version.
2005-04-26[PATCH] udev - allow all files in a directory as the configkay.sievers@vrfy.org
I was on the train for 5 hours today and the TODO is almost empty :) So, at least four people wanted this feature, then here is a actual working patch. We may specify now in udev.conf: udev_rules="/etc/udev/" and udev will scan the whole directory for files ending with *.rules, sort it in lexical order and create our rule list from all of the files. A plain given file will still work and the same applies to the *.permissions. I sort the files in our usual linked list, cause klibc has no scandir().
2005-04-26[PATCH] udev - create all partitions of blockdevicekay.sievers@vrfy.org
Here is the first try to create all partitons of a blockdevice, since removable media devices may need to acces the expected partition to revalidate the media. It uses the attribute syntax introduced with the last %s{file} patch. I'm using this with my multi-slot-flash-card-reader: SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-SMC ", NAME{all_partitions}="smartmedia" SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-CFC ", NAME{all_partitions}="compactflash" SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-MSC ", NAME{all_partitions}="memorystick" SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-MMC ", NAME{all_partitions}="multimedia" and I get: tree /udev/ /udev/ |-- memorystick |-- memorystick1 |-- memorystick10 |-- memorystick11 |-- memorystick12 |-- memorystick13 |-- memorystick14 |-- memorystick15 |-- memorystick2 |-- memorystick3 |-- memorystick4 |-- memorystick5 |-- memorystick6 |-- memorystick7 |-- memorystick8 |-- memorystick9 |-- multimedia |-- multimedia1 |-- multimedia10 |-- multimedia11 |-- multimedia12 |-- multimedia13 |-- multimedia14 |-- multimedia15 |-- multimedia2 |-- multimedia3 |-- multimedia4 |-- multimedia5 |-- multimedia6 |-- multimedia7 |-- multimedia8 |-- multimedia9 ... If needed, we can make the number of partions to create adjustable with the attribute?
2005-04-26[PATCH] allow SYSFS{file}kay.sievers@vrfy.org
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 03:36:00AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > > Since we have %s{file} it may be nice to allow SYSFS{file}. > This patch allows: > > BUS="usb", SYSFS{idProduct}="a511", NAME="video%n" > > compared to the current: > > BUS="usb", SYSFS_idProduct="a511", NAME="video%n" > > The curent syntax is still supported. > Looks a bit nicer and less hackish, I think. Better patch with infrastructure to easily implement KEY{attribute} for every other key. The first user is the SYSFS{file} key. Both versions, brackets or underscore is supported for the attribute.
2005-04-26[PATCH] move get_pair to udev_config.c because udevinfo doesn't need all of ↵greg@kroah.com
namedev.o
2005-04-26[PATCH] misc code cleanups.greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] small cut n paste error fixhannal@us.ibm.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] add udev logging to info logkay.sievers@vrfy.org
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 05:14:16AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:10:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 02:34:26PM -0600, Clay Haapala wrote: > > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Chris Friesen spake thusly: > > > > > > > > Maybe for ones with a matching rule, you could print something like: > > > > > > > > > > > Is the act of printing/syslogging a rule in an of itself? > > > > No, as currently the only way stuff ends up in the syslog is if > > DEBUG=true is used on the build line. > > > > But it's sounding like we might want to change that... :) > > How about this in the syslog after connect/disconnect? > > Jan 15 05:07:45 pim udev[28007]: configured rule in '/etc/udev/udev.rules' at line 17 applied, 'video*' becomes 'video/webcam%n' > Jan 15 05:07:45 pim udev[28007]: creating device node '/udev/video/webcam0' > Jan 15 05:07:47 pim udev[28015]: removing device node '/udev/video/webcam0' Here is a slightly better version. I've created a logging.h file and moved the debug macros from udev.h in there. If you type: 'make' - you will get a binary that prints one or two lines to syslog if a device node is created or deleted 'make LOG=false' - you get a binary that prints asolutely nothing 'make DEBUG=true' - the same as today, it will print all debug lines
2005-04-26[PATCH] Add some helpful messages if the user uses the older config file formatgreg@kroah.com
Also fail a rule that we can not parse, as we can easily create incorrect rules if we do not do this.
2005-04-26[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)kay.sievers@vrfy.org
> Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2005-04-26[PATCH] add IGNORE rule typechristophe@saout.de
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:24:53AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > There should be a possibility to tell udev not to create a device node. > > > > device-mapper: Usually set up by libdevmapper (or EVMS tools) which > > creates the device node on its own under /dev/mapper/<name>. > > > > With udev a second device is created named /dev/dm-<minor> which is not > > really needed. > > Good point. Ok, I'll agree with you. Care to make up a patch for this > kind of feature? Yes, I can try. There was no way to tell not to do anything so I created one. Errors are signalled via negative return values, so I thought that a positive, non-zero one could mean to ignore the device. I don't like it but perhaps you have a better solution.
2005-04-26[PATCH] small cleanupchristophe@saout.de
This one is nothing important, just add some quotes to be more consistent with the rest and make sure that the return value is positive (since the error return values are negative). Hmm?
2005-04-26[PATCH] replace list_for_each with list_for_each_entry, saving a few lines ↵greg@kroah.com
of code.
2005-04-26[PATCH] cleanup namedev_parse debug textkay.sievers@vrfy.org
I missed a few spaces with my recent change.
2005-04-26[PATCH] small trivial cleanup of latest changeskay.sievers@vrfy.org
here is a patch for a typo in the man page, a whitespace cleanup and a replace for the magic hex ASCII in char operations.
2005-04-26[PATCH] Don't require the BUS value for the LABEL rule.greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] Don't require the BUS value for the CALLOUT rule.greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] check for empty line a bit better in the parser.greg@kroah.com
Thanks to Mitch <mitch@0bits.com> for pointing this out.
2005-04-26[PATCH] add ability to have up to 5 SYSFS_ file/value pairs for the LABEL rule.greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] fix comment and whitespace handling in config files.Roman.Kagan@itep.ru
This chunk broke parsing of blank lines and comments with blanks before '#'. Please revert it with the patch below. Roman.
2005-04-26[PATCH] trivial cleanup parser changeskay.sievers@vrfy.org
o use defines in debug strings o replace my 'xxx' debug :) o shorten line in man page example to not to exceed 80 chars when printed
2005-04-26[PATCH] don't rely on field order in namedev_parsekay.sievers@vrfy.org
o change the parsing to get a key from the rule and sort it into our list of known keys instead of expecting a special order o the key to match a sysfs file must be prependend by 'SYSFS_' now to match with the new parsing. (The config must be changed, but it's a bit more descriptive too.) o put names of fields in define's, like the name of the methods o update all tests and the man page
2005-04-26[PATCH] experimental (very simple) SYMLINK creationkay.sievers@vrfy.org
> > here is a experimental symlink creation patch - for discussion, > > in which direction we should go. > > It is possible now to define SYMLINK= after the NAME= in udev.rules. > > The link is relative to the node, but the path is not optimized now > > if the node and the link are in the same nested directory. > > Only one link is supported, cause i need to sleep now :) > > > > 06-simple-symlink-creation.diff > > simple symlink creation > > reorganized udev-remove to have access to the symlink field > > subdir creation/removal are functions now > > udev-test.pl tests for link creation/removal Here is a new version with relative link target path optimization an better tests in udev-test.pl: LABEL, BUS="scsi", vendor="IBM-ESXS", NAME="1/2/a/b/node", SYMLINK="1/2/c/d/symlink" Dec 7 06:48:34 pim udev[13789]: create_node: symlink 'udev-root/1/2/c/d/symlink' to node '1/2/a/b/node' requested Dec 7 06:48:34 pim udev[13789]: create_path: created 'udev-root/1/2/c' Dec 7 06:48:34 pim udev[13789]: create_path: created 'udev-root/1/2/c/d' Dec 7 06:48:34 pim udev[13789]: create_node: symlink(../../a/b/node, udev-root/1/2/c/d/symlink)
2005-04-26[PATCH] fix permission handling logicgreg@kroah.com
Now we can handle wildcards properly within the permission file.