| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
I'm assuming that it's fine if a _const_ or _pure_ function
calls assert. It is assumed that the assert won't trigger,
and even if it does, it can only trigger on the first call
with a given set of parameters, and we don't care if the
compiler moves the order of calls.
|
|
Add a new job mode: replace-irreversibly. Jobs enqueued using this mode
cannot be implicitly canceled by later enqueued conflicting jobs.
They can however still be canceled with an explicit "systemctl cancel"
call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#pragma once has been "un-deprecated" in gcc since 3.3, and is widely supported
in other compilers.
I've been using and maintaining (rebasing) this patch for a while now, as
it annoyed me to see #ifndef fooblahfoo, etc all over the place,
almost arrogant about the annoyance of having to define all these names to
perform a commen but neccicary functionality, when a completely superior
alternative exists.
I havn't sent it till now, cause its kindof a style change, and it is bad
voodoo to mess with style that has been established by more established
editors. So feel free to lambast me as a crazy bafoon.
v2 - preserve externally used headers
|
|
Instead of generic "Starting..." and "Started" messages for all unit use
type-dependent messages. For example, mounts will announce "Mounting..."
and "Mounted".
Add status messages to units of types that used to be entirely silent
(automounts, sockets, targets, devices). For unit types whose jobs are
instantaneous, report only the job completion, not the starting event.
Socket units with non-instantaneous jobs are rare (Exec*= is not used
often in socket units), so I chose not to print the starting messages
for them either.
This will hopefully give people better understanding of the boot.
|
|
Two of our current job types are special:
JOB_TRY_RESTART, JOB_RELOAD_OR_START.
They differ from other job types by being sensitive to the unit active state.
They perform some action when the unit is active and some other action
otherwise. This raises a question: when exactly should the unit state be
checked to make the decision?
Currently the unit state is checked when the job becomes runnable. It's more
sensible to check the state immediately when the job is added by the user.
When the user types "systemctl try-restart foo.service", he really intends
to restart the service if it's running right now. If it isn't running right
now, the restart is pointless.
Consider the example (from Bugzilla[1]):
sleep.service takes some time to start.
hello.service has After=sleep.service.
Both services get started. Two jobs will appear:
hello.service/start waiting
sleep.service/start running
Then someone runs "systemctl try-restart hello.service".
Currently the try-restart operation will block and wait for
sleep.service/start to complete.
The correct result is to complete the try-restart operation immediately
with success, because hello.service is not running. The two original
jobs must not be disturbed by this.
To fix this we introduce two new concepts:
- a new job type: JOB_NOP
A JOB_NOP job does not do anything to the unit. It does not pull in any
dependencies. It is always immediately runnable. When installed to a unit,
it sits in a special slot (u->nop_job) where it never conflicts with
the installed job (u->job) of a different type. It never merges with jobs
of other types, but it can merge into an already installed JOB_NOP job.
- "collapsing" of job types
When a job of one of the two special types is added, the state of the unit
is checked immediately and the job type changes:
JOB_TRY_RESTART -> JOB_RESTART or JOB_NOP
JOB_RELOAD_OR_START -> JOB_RELOAD or JOB_START
Should a job type JOB_RELOAD_OR_START appear later during job merging, it
collapses immediately afterwards.
Collapsing actually makes some things simpler, because there are now fewer
job types that are allowed in the transaction.
[1] Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753586
|
|
Recursive cancellation of jobs would trigger OnFailure actions of
dependent jobs. This is not desirable when isolating.
Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798328
|
|
Jobs were not preserved correctly over a daemon-reload operation.
A systemctl process waiting for a job completion received a job removal
signal. The job itself changed its id. The job timeout started ticking all
over again.
This fixes the deficiencies.
|
|
Merging of jobs can result in more than one client being interested in a job.
|
|
Previously transactions could reference installed jobs. It made some issues
difficult to fix.
This sets new rules for jobs:
A job cannot be both a member of a transaction and installed. When jobs are
created, they are linked to a transaction. The whole transaction is constructed
(with merging of jobs within, etc.). When it's complete, all the jobs are
unlinked from it one by one and let to install themselves. It is during the
installation when merging with previously installed jobs (from older
transactions) is contemplated.
Merging with installed jobs has different rules than merging within a
transaction:
- An installed conflicting job gets cancelled. It cannot be simply deleted,
because someone might be waiting for its completion on DBus.
- An installed, but still waiting, job can be safely merged into.
- An installed and running job can be tricky. For some job types it is safe to
just merge. For the other types we merge anyway, but put the job back into
JOB_WAITING to allow it to run again. This may be suboptimal, but it is not
currently possible to have more than one installed job for a unit.
Note this also fixes a bug where the anchor job could be deleted during merging
within the transaction.
|
|
Let the jobs install themselves.
|
|
tr->anchor_job is sufficient.
|
|
Let the transactions maintain their own anchor links.
|
|
|
|
manager.c takes care of the main loop, unit management, signal handling, ...
transaction.c computes transactions.
After split:
manager.c: 65 KB
transaction.c: 40 KB
|
|
This makes it obvious that transactions are short-lived. They are created in
manager_add_job() and destroyed after the application of jobs.
It also prepares for a split of the transaction code to a new source.
|
|
Split the uninstallation of the job from job_free() into a separate function.
Adjust the callers.
job_free() now only works on unlinked and uninstalled jobs. This enforces clear
thinking about job lifetimes.
|
|
We finally got the OK from all contributors with non-trivial commits to
relicense systemd from GPL2+ to LGPL2.1+.
Some udev bits continue to be GPL2+ for now, but we are looking into
relicensing them too, to allow free copy/paste of all code within
systemd.
The bits that used to be MIT continue to be MIT.
The big benefit of the relicensing is that closed source code may now
link against libsystemd-login.so and friends.
|
|
|
