| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
sd_rtnl_xxx_new_yyy()
So far we followed the rule to always indicate the "flavour" of
constructors after the "_new_" or "_open_" in the function name, so
let's keep things in sync here for rtnl and do the same.
|
|
The "sd_" prefix is supposed to be used on exported symbols only, and
not in the middle of names. Let's drop it from the cleanup macros hence,
to make things simpler.
The bus cleanup macros don't carry the "sd_" either, so this brings the
APIs a bit nearer.
|
|
We are more likely to catch errors if we don't use '0' as test value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also insist on messages being sealed before reading them. In other
words we don't allow interleaving of reading and appending to messages.
|
|
|
|
We still only produce on .so, but let's keep the sources separate to make things a bit
less messy.
|
