Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
When storing negative responses, clamp the SOA minimum TTL (as suggested
by RFC2308) to the TTL of the NSEC/NSEC3 RRs we used to prove
non-existance, if it there is any.
This is necessary since otherwise an attacker might put together a faked
negative response for one of our question including a high-ttl SOA RR
for any parent zone, and we'd use trust the TTL.
|
|
This collects statistical data about transactions, dnssec verifications
and the cache, and exposes it over the bus. The systemd-resolve-host
tool learns new options to query these statistics and reset them.
|
|
OK to be unsigned
This large patch adds a couple of mechanisms to ensure we get NSEC3 and
proof-of-unsigned support into place. Specifically:
- Each item in an DnsAnswer gets two bit flags now:
DNS_ANSWER_AUTHENTICATED and DNS_ANSWER_CACHEABLE. The former is
necessary since DNS responses might contain signed as well as unsigned
RRsets in one, and we need to remember which ones are signed and which
ones aren't. The latter is necessary, since not we need to keep track
which RRsets may be cached and which ones may not be, even while
manipulating DnsAnswer objects.
- The .n_answer_cachable of DnsTransaction is dropped now (it used to
store how many of the first DnsAnswer entries are cachable), and
replaced by the DNS_ANSWER_CACHABLE flag instead.
- NSEC3 proofs are implemented now (lacking support for the wildcard
part, to be added in a later commit).
- Support for the "AD" bit has been dropped. It's unsafe, and now that
we have end-to-end authentication we don't need it anymore.
- An auxiliary DnsTransaction of a DnsTransactions is now kept around as
least as long as the latter stays around. We no longer remove the
auxiliary DnsTransaction as soon as it completed. THis is necessary,
as we now are interested not only in the RRsets it acquired but also
in its authentication status.
|
|
This new functions exports cached records of type PTR, SRV and TXT into
an existing DnsPacket. This is used in order to fill in known records
to mDNS queries, for known answer supression.
|
|
This adds a new SD_RESOLVED_AUTHENTICATED flag for responses we return
on the bus. When set, then the data has been authenticated. For now this
mostly reflects the DNSSEC AD bit, if DNSSEC=trust is set. As soon as
the client-side validation is complete it will be hooked up to this flag
too.
We also set this bit whenver we generated the data ourselves, for
example, because it originates in our local LLMNR zone, or from the
built-in trust anchor database.
The "systemd-resolve-host" tool has been updated to show the flag state
for the data it shows.
|
|
This adds most basic operation for doing DNSSEC validation on the
client side. However, it does not actually add the verification logic to
the resolver. Specifically, this patch only includes:
- Verifying DNSKEY RRs against a DS RRs
- Verifying RRSets against a combination of RRSIG and DNSKEY RRs
- Matching up RRSIG RRs and DNSKEY RRs
- Matching up RR keys and RRSIG RRs
- Calculating the DNSSEC key tag from a DNSKEY RR
All currently used DNSSEC combinations of SHA and RSA are implemented. Support
for MD5 hashing and DSA or EC cyphers are not. MD5 and DSA are probably
obsolete, and shouldn't be added. EC should probably be added
eventually, if it actually is deployed on the Internet.
|
|
This is a continuation of the previous include sort patch, which
only sorted for .c files.
|
|
Only one key is allowed per transaction now, so let's simplify things and only allow putting
one question key into the cache at a time.
|
|
|
|
Let's simplify things and only maintain a single RR key per transaction
object, instead of a full DnsQuestion. Unicast DNS and LLMNR don't
support multiple questions per packet anway, and Multicast DNS suggests
coalescing questions beyond a single dns query, across the whole system.
|
|
This patch removes includes that are not used. The removals were found with
include-what-you-use which checks if any of the symbols from a header is
in use.
|
|
|
|
responses
|
|
Name defending is still missing.
|
|
|
|
different clients
|
|
|