| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
Note that this is not complete yet, as we don't handle wildcard domains
correctly, nor handle domains correctly that use empty non-terminals.
|
|
|
|
digest ids
Let's move this into a function digest_to_gcrypt() that we can reuse
later on when implementing NSEC3 validation.
|
|
This adds a new validation result DNSSEC_UNSUPPORTED_ALGORITHM which is
returned when we encounter an unsupported crypto algorithm when trying
to validate RRSIG/DNSKEY combinations. Previously we'd return ENOTSUPP
in this case, but it's better to consider this a non-error DNSSEC
validation result, since our reaction to this case needs to be more like
in cases such as expired or missing keys: we need to keep continue
validation looking for another RRSIG/DNSKEY combination that works
better for us.
This also reworks how dnssec_validate_rrsig_search() propagates errors
from dnssec_validate_rrsig(). Previously, errors such as unsupported
algorithms or expired signatures would not be propagated, but simply be
returned as "missing-key".
|
|
This adds initial support for validating RRSIG/DNSKEY/DS chains when
doing lookups. Proof-of-non-existance, or proof-of-unsigned-zones is not
implemented yet.
With this change DnsTransaction objects will generate additional
DnsTransaction objects when looking for DNSKEY or DS RRs to validate an
RRSIG on a response. DnsTransaction objects are thus created for three
reasons now:
1) Because a user asked for something to be resolved, i.e. requested by
a DnsQuery/DnsQueryCandidate object.
2) As result of LLMNR RR probing, requested by a DnsZoneItem.
3) Because another DnsTransaction requires the requested RRs for
validation of its own response.
DnsTransactions are shared between all these users, and are GC
automatically as soon as all of these users don't need a specific
transaction anymore.
To unify the handling of these three reasons for existance for a
DnsTransaction, a new common naming is introduced: each DnsTransaction
now tracks its "owners" via a Set* object named "notify_xyz", containing
all owners to notify on completion.
A new DnsTransaction state is introduced called "VALIDATING" that is
entered after a response has been receieved which needs to be validated,
as long as we are still waiting for the DNSKEY/DS RRs from other
DnsTransactions.
This patch will request the DNSKEY/DS RRs bottom-up, and then validate
them top-down.
Caching of RRs is now only done after verification, so that the cache is
not poisoned with known invalid data.
The "DnsAnswer" object gained a substantial number of new calls, since
we need to add/remove RRs to it dynamically now.
|
|
the DNSKEY's algorithm
As long as we support the digest we are good.
|
|
name, not the owner name
When the DNSKEY is in higher zone, then that's OK, and we need to check
the RRSIG's signer name against the DNSKEY hence.
|
|
We actually maintain an array of pointers to RRs, not of RRs themselves,
fix the qsort() invocation accordingly.
|
|
libgcrypt encodes the error source in the error code, we need to mask
that away before comparing error codes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
files for now
|
|
The setting controls which kind of DNSSEC validation is done: none at
all, trusting the AD bit, or client-side validation.
For now, no validation is implemented, hence the setting doesn't do much
yet, except of toggling the CD bit in the generated messages if full
client-side validation is requested.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSASHA1_NSEC3_SHA1 is an alias for RSASHA1, used to do NSEC3 feature
negotiation. While verifying RRsets there's no difference, hence support
it here.
|
|
|
|
This adds most basic operation for doing DNSSEC validation on the
client side. However, it does not actually add the verification logic to
the resolver. Specifically, this patch only includes:
- Verifying DNSKEY RRs against a DS RRs
- Verifying RRSets against a combination of RRSIG and DNSKEY RRs
- Matching up RRSIG RRs and DNSKEY RRs
- Matching up RR keys and RRSIG RRs
- Calculating the DNSSEC key tag from a DNSKEY RR
All currently used DNSSEC combinations of SHA and RSA are implemented. Support
for MD5 hashing and DSA or EC cyphers are not. MD5 and DSA are probably
obsolete, and shouldn't be added. EC should probably be added
eventually, if it actually is deployed on the Internet.
|
