summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/resolve
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-01-11resolved: don't attempt to send queries for DNSSEC RR types to servers not ↵Lennart Poettering
supporting them If we already degraded the feature level below DO don't bother with sending requests for DS, DNSKEY, RRSIG, NSEC, NSEC3 or NSEC3PARAM RRs. After all, we cannot do DNSSEC validation then anyway, and we better not press a legacy server like this with such modern concepts. This also has the benefit that when we try to validate a response we received using DNSSEC, and we detect a limited server support level while doing so, all further auxiliary DNSSEC queries will fail right-away.
2016-01-11resolved: log about reasons for switching to TCPLennart Poettering
2016-01-11resolved: when we get a packet failure from a server, don't downgrade UDP to ↵Lennart Poettering
TCP or vice versa Under the assumption that packet failures (i.e. FORMERR, SERVFAIL, NOTIMP) are caused by packet contents, not used transport, we shouldn't switch between UDP and TCP when we get them, but only downgrade the higher levels down to UDP.
2016-01-11resolved: properly handle UDP ICMP errors as lost packetsLennart Poettering
UDP ICMP errors are reported to us via recvmsg() when we read a reply. Handle this properly, and consider this a lost packet, and retry the connection. This also adds some additional logging for invalid incoming packets.
2016-01-11resolved: when we get a TCP connection failure, try againLennart Poettering
Previously, when we couldn't connect to a DNS server via TCP we'd abort the whole transaction using a "connection-failure" state. This change removes that, and counts failed connections as "lost packet" events, so that we switch back to the UDP protocol again.
2016-01-11resolved: when DNS/TCP doesn't work, try DNS/UDP againLennart Poettering
If we failed to contact a DNS server via TCP, bump of the feature level to UDP again. This way we'll switch back between UDP and TCP if we fail to contact a host. Generally, we prefer UDP over TCP, which is why UDP is a higher feature level. But some servers only support UDP but not TCP hence when reaching the lowest feature level of TCP and want to downgrade from there, pick UDP again. We this keep downgrading until we reach TCP and then we cycle through UDP and TCP.
2016-01-11resolved: introduce dns_transaction_retry() and use it everywhereLennart Poettering
The code to retry transactions has been used over and over again, simplify it by replacing it by a new function.
2016-01-11resolved: set a description on all our event sourcesLennart Poettering
2016-01-11resolved: fix error propagationLennart Poettering
2016-01-11shared: make sure foo.bar and foobar result in different domain name hashesLennart Poettering
This also introduces a new macro siphash24_compress_byte() which is useful to add a single byte into the hash stream, and ports one user over to it.
2016-01-11resolved: properly look for NSEC/NSEC3 RRs when getting a positive wildcard ↵Lennart Poettering
response This implements RFC 5155, Section 8.8 and RFC 4035, Section 5.3.4: When we receive a response with an RRset generated from a wildcard we need to look for one NSEC/NSEC3 RR that proves that there's no explicit RR around before we accept the wildcard RRset as response. This patch does a couple of things: the validation calls will now identify wildcard signatures for us, and let us know the RRSIG used (so that the RRSIG's signer field let's us know what the wildcard was that generate the entry). Moreover, when iterating trough the RRsets of a response we now employ three phases instead of just two. a) in the first phase we only look for DNSKEYs RRs b) in the second phase we only look for NSEC RRs c) in the third phase we look for all kinds of RRs Phase a) is necessary, since DNSKEYs "unlock" more signatures for us, hence we shouldn't assume a key is missing until all DNSKEY RRs have been processed. Phase b) is necessary since NSECs need to be validated before we can validate wildcard RRs due to the logic explained above. Phase c) validates everything else. This phase also handles RRsets that cannot be fully validated and removes them or lets the transaction fail.
2016-01-11resolved: split up nsec3_hashed_domain() into two callsLennart Poettering
There's now nsec3_hashed_domain_format() and nsec3_hashed_domain_make(). The former takes a hash value and formats it as domain, the latter takes a domain name, hashes it and then invokes nsec3_hashed_domain_format(). This way we can reuse more code, as the formatting logic can be unified between this call and another place.
2016-01-11resolved: drop flags unused parameter from nsec3_is_goodLennart Poettering
2016-01-11resolved: when validating, first strip revoked trust anchor keys from ↵Lennart Poettering
validated keys list When validating a transaction we initially collect DNSKEY, DS, SOA RRs in the "validated_keys" list, that we need for the proofs. This includes DNSKEY and DS data from our trust anchor database. Quite possibly we learn that some of these DNSKEY/DS RRs have been revoked between the time we request and collect those additional RRs and we begin the validation step. In this case we need to make sure that the respective DS/DNSKEY RRs are removed again from our list. This patch adds that, and strips known revoked trust anchor RRs from the validated list before we begin the actual validation proof, and each time we add more DNSKEY material to it while we are doing the proof.
2016-01-11basic: introduce generic ascii_strlower_n() call and make use of it everywhereLennart Poettering
2016-01-11resolved: rework trust anchor revoke checkingLennart Poettering
Instead of first iterating through all DNSKEYs in the DnsAnswer in dns_transaction_check_revoked_trust_anchors(), and then doing that a second time in dns_trust_anchor_check_revoked(), do so only once in the former, and pass the dnskey we found directly to the latter.
2016-01-11resolved: look for revoked trust anchors before validating a messageLennart Poettering
There's not reason to wait for checking for revoked trust anchors until after validation, after all revoked DNSKEYs only need to be self-signed, but not have a full trust chain. This way, we can be sure that all trust anchor lookups we do during validation already honour that some keys might have been revoked.
2016-01-11resolved: use dns_answer_size() where appropriate to handle NULL DnsAnswerLennart Poettering
2016-01-11resolved: remove one level of indentation in dns_transaction_validate_dnssec()Lennart Poettering
Invert an "if" check, so that we can use "continue" rather than another code block indentation.
2016-01-11resolved: be less strict where the OPT pseudo-RR is placedLennart Poettering
This increases compatibility with crappy Belkin routers.
2016-01-11resolved: rename suffix_rr → zone_rrLennart Poettering
The domain name for this NSEC3 RR was originally stored in a variable called "suffix", which was then renamed to "zone" in d1511b3338f431de3c95a50a9c1aca297e0c0734. Hence also rename the RR variable accordingly.
2016-01-11resolved: fix NSEC3 iterations limit to what RFC5155 suggestsLennart Poettering
2016-01-07Merge pull request #2284 from teg/resolved-cname-2Lennart Poettering
resolved: query_process_cname - make fully recursive
2016-01-07resolved: query_process_cname - make fully recursiveTom Gundersen
This ensures we properly resolve the CNAME chain as far as we can, rather than only CNAME chains of length one.
2016-01-06update DNSSEC TODOLennart Poettering
2016-01-06resolved: introduce support for per-interface negative trust anchorsLennart Poettering
2016-01-06resolved: when dumping the NTA database, sort outputLennart Poettering
Now that we populate the trust database by default with a larger number of entires, we better make sure to output a more readable version.
2016-01-06resolved: populate negative trust anchor by defaultLennart Poettering
Let's increase compatibility with many private domains by default, and ship a default NTA list of wel-known private domains, where it is unlikely they will be deployed as official TLD anytime soon.
2016-01-06resolved: log all OOM errorsLennart Poettering
2016-01-06resolved: reuse dns_trust_anchor_knows_domain() at another locationLennart Poettering
2016-01-06resolved: count unsupported dnssec algorithm as indeterminate RRsetLennart Poettering
After all, when we don't support the algorithm we cannot determine validity.
2016-01-05resolved: try to detect fritz.box-style private DNS zones, and downgrade to ↵Lennart Poettering
non-DNSSEC mode for them This adds logic to detect cases like the Fritz!Box routers which serve a private DNS domain "fritz.box" under the TLD "box" that does not exist in the root servers. If this is detected DNSSEC validation is turned off for this private domain, thus improving compatibility with such private DNS zones. This should be fairly secure as we first rely on the proof that .box does not exist before this logic is applied. Nevertheless the logic is only enabled for DNSSEC=allow-downgrade mode. This logic does not work for routers that set up a full DNS zone directly under a non-existing TLD, as in that case we cannot prove that the domain is truly non-existing according to the root servers.
2016-01-05resolved: when dumping trust anchor contents, clarify when it is emptyLennart Poettering
2016-01-05resolved: fix DNSSEC transaction dependency recursion checkLennart Poettering
We followed the wrong connection. This only worked sometimes at all, because we also return the wrong error code.
2016-01-05update DNSSEC TODOLennart Poettering
2016-01-05resolved,networkd: add a per-interface DNSSEC settingLennart Poettering
This adds a DNSSEC= setting to .network files, and makes resolved honour them.
2016-01-05resolved: log about per-interface setting parse errorsLennart Poettering
2016-01-05resolved: properly release all DnsServers that belong to a linkLennart Poettering
2016-01-05resolved: rename "downgrade-ok" mode to "allow-downgrade"Lennart Poettering
After discussing this with Tom, we figured out "allow-downgrade" sounds nicer.
2016-01-05resolved: make MulticastDNS support configurable in resolved.confLennart Poettering
The option is already there, but wasn't exported in the configuration file so far. Fix that.
2016-01-05networkd,resolved: add a per-interface mdns configuration optionLennart Poettering
2016-01-05resolved,networkd: unify ResolveSupport enumLennart Poettering
networkd previously knew an enum "ResolveSupport" for configuring per-interface LLMNR support, resolved had a similar enum just called "Support", with the same value and similar pasers. Unify this, call the enum ResolveSupport, and port both daemons to it.
2016-01-05basic: add string table macros for "extended boolean" enumsLennart Poettering
In a couple of cases we maintain configuration settings that know an on and off state, like a boolean, plus some additional states. We generally parse them as booleans first, and if that fails check for specific additional values. This adds a generalized set of macros for parsing such settings, and ports one use in resolved and another in networkd over to it.
2016-01-05resolved: also skip built-in trust anchor addition of there's a DNSKEY RR ↵Lennart Poettering
for the root domain defined We already skip this when the trust anchor files define a DS RR for the root domain, now also skip it if there's a DNSKEY RR.
2016-01-05resolved: move trust anchor files to /etc/dnssec-trust-anchors.d/Lennart Poettering
These files are not specific to resolved really, and this is then more in-line with how /etc/sysctl.d and suchlike is handled.
2016-01-05resolved: when caching negative responses, honour NSEC/NSEC3 TTLsLennart Poettering
When storing negative responses, clamp the SOA minimum TTL (as suggested by RFC2308) to the TTL of the NSEC/NSEC3 RRs we used to prove non-existance, if it there is any. This is necessary since otherwise an attacker might put together a faked negative response for one of our question including a high-ttl SOA RR for any parent zone, and we'd use trust the TTL.
2016-01-04update DNSSEC TODOLennart Poettering
2016-01-04resolved: explicitly handle case when the trust anchor is emptyLennart Poettering
Since we honour RFC5011 revoked keys it might happen we end up with an empty trust anchor, or one where there's no entry for the root left. With this patch the logic is changed what to do in this case. Before this patch we'd end up requesting the root DS, which returns with NODATA but a signed NSEC we cannot verify, since the trust anchor is empty after all. Thus we'd return a DNSSEC result of "missing-key", as we lack a verified version of the key. With this patch in place, look-ups for the root DS are explicitly recognized, and not passed on to the DNS servers. Instead, if downgrade-ok mode is on an unsigned NODATA response is synthesized, so that the validator code continues under the assumption the root zone was unsigned. If downgrade-ok mode is off a new transaction failure is generated, that makes this case recognizable.
2016-01-04resolved: introduce a proper bus error for DNSSEC validation errorsLennart Poettering
2016-01-04resolved: explicitly avoid cyclic transaction dependenciesLennart Poettering
We already try hard not to create cyclic transaction dependencies, where a transaction requires another one for DNSSEC validation purposes, which in turn (possibly indirectly) pulls in the original transaction again, thus resulting in a cyclic dependency and ultimately a deadlock since each transaction waits for another one forever. So far we wanted to avoid such cyclic dependencies by only going "up the tree" when requesting auxiliary RRs and only going from one RR type to another, but never back. However this turned out to be insufficient. Consider a domain that publishes one or more DNSKEY but which has no DS for it. A request for the domain's DNSKEY triggers a request for the domain's DS, which will then fail, but return an NSEC, signed by the DNSKEY. To validate that we'd request the DNSKEY again. Thus a DNSKEY request results in a DS request which results in the original DNSKEY request again. If the original lookup had been a DS lookup we'd end up in the same cyclic dependency, hence we cannot statically break one of them, since both requests are of course fully valid. Hence, do full cyclic dependency checking: each time we are about to add a dependency to a transaction, check if the transaction is already a dependency of the dependency (recursively down the tree).