| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
string-util.[ch]
There are more than enough calls doing string manipulations to deserve
its own files, hence do something about it.
This patch also sorts the #include blocks of all files that needed to be
updated, according to the sorting suggestions from CODING_STYLE. Since
pretty much every file needs our string manipulation functions this
effectively means that most files have sorted #include blocks now.
Also touches a few unrelated include files.
|
|
Make sure all variable-length inputs are properly terminated or that
their length is encoded in some way. This avoids ambiguity of
adjacent inputs.
E.g., in case of a hash function taking two strings, compressing "ab"
followed by "c" is now distinct from "a" followed by "bc".
|
|
All our hash functions are based on siphash24(), factor out
siphash_init() and siphash24_finalize() and pass the siphash
state to the hash functions rather than the hash key.
This simplifies the hash functions, and in particular makes
composition simpler as calling siphash24_compress() repeatedly
on separate chunks of input has the same effect as first
concatenating the input and then calling siphash23_compress()
on the result.
|
|
This is specifically useful for appending the mDNS ".local" suffix to a
single-label hostname in the most correct way. (used in later commit)
|
|
Given three DNS names this function indicates if the second argument lies
strictly between the first and the third according to the canonical DNS
name order. Note that the order is circular, so the last name is
considered to be before the first.
|
|
The canonical DNS name ordering considers the rightmost label the most significant,
we were considering it the least significant. This is important when implementing
NSEC, which relies on the correct order.
|
|
Intended to be called repeatedly, and returns then successive unescaped labels
from the most to the least significant (left to right).
This is slightly inefficient as it scans the string three times (two would be
sufficient): once to find the end of the string, once to find the beginning
of each label and lastly once to do the actual unescaping. The latter two
could be done in one go, but that seemed unnecessarily convoluted.
|
|
|
