| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
In order to improve energy consumption we should minimize our wake-ups
when handling timers. Hence, for each timer take an accuracy value and
schedule the actual wake-up time somewhere between the specified time
and the specified timer plus the accuracy.
The specified time of timer event sources hence becomes the time the
handler is called the *earliest*, and the specified time plus the accuracy
the time by which it is called the *latest*, leaving the library the
freedom to schedule the wake-up somewhere inbetween.
If the accuracy is specified as 0 the default of 250ms will be used.
When scheduling timeouts we will now try to elapse them at the same
point within each second, across the entire system. We do this by using
a fixed perturbation value keyed off the boot id. If this point within a
second is not in the acceptable range, we try again with a fixed time
within each 250ms time step. If that doesn't work either, we wake up at
the last possible time.
|
|
I'm assuming that it's fine if a _const_ or _pure_ function
calls assert. It is assumed that the assert won't trigger,
and even if it does, it can only trigger on the first call
with a given set of parameters, and we don't care if the
compiler moves the order of calls.
|
|
code in src/shared/macro.h only defined MAX/MIN in case
they were not defined previously. however the MAX/MIN
macros implemented in glibc are not of the "safe" kind but defined
as:
define MIN(a,b) (((a)<(b))?(a):(b))
define MAX(a,b) (((a)>(b))?(a):(b))
Avoid nasty side effects by using our own versions instead.
Also fix the warnings derived from this change.
[zj: - modify MAX3 macro to fix warning about _a shadowing _a,
- do bootchart/svg.c too,
- remove unused MIN3.]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
