Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
In service file, if the file has some of special SMACK label in
ExecStart= and systemd has no permission for the special SMACK label
then permission error will occurred. To resolve this, systemd should
be able to set its SMACK label to something accessible of ExecStart=.
So introduce new SmackProcessLabel. If label is specified with
SmackProcessLabel= then the child systemd will set its label to
that. To successfully execute the ExecStart=, accessible label should
be specified with SmackProcessLabel=.
Additionally, by SMACK policy, if the file in ExecStart= has no
SMACK64EXEC then the executed process will have given label by
SmackProcessLabel=. But if the file has SMACK64EXEC then the
SMACK64EXEC label will be overridden.
[zj: reword man page]
Signed-off-by: Anthony G. Basile <blueness@gentoo.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Anthony G. Basile <blueness@gentoo.org>
|
|
of the matching selinux code
Signed-off-by: Anthony G. Basile <blueness@gentoo.org>
|
|
and all that reset it to defaults mac_{selinux|smack}_fix()
Let's clean up the naming schemes a bit and use the same one for SMACK
and for SELINUX.
Signed-off-by: Anthony G. Basile <blueness@gentoo.org>
|
|
new mac_{smack,selinux,apparmor}_xyz() convention
Signed-off-by: Anthony G. Basile <blueness@gentoo.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Anthony G. Basile <blueness@gentoo.org>
|
|
move label apis to selinux-util.ch or smack-util.ch appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Anthony G. Basile <blueness@gentoo.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Anthony G. Basile <blueness@gentoo.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Anthony G. Basile <blueness@gentoo.org>
|