summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/udev-add.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2005-04-26[PATCH] move all of the DBUS logic into one file and remove all of the ↵greg@kroah.com
#ifdef crud from the main code.
2005-04-26[PATCH] D-BUS patch for udev-008david@fubar.dk
Attached is a patch against udev-008 to send out a D-BUS message when a device node is added or removed. Using D-BUS lingo, udev acquires the org.kernel.udev service and sends out a NodeCreated or NodeDeleted signal on the org.kernel.udev.NodeMonitor interface. Each signal carries two parameters: the node in question and the corresponding sysfs path. [Note: the D-BUS concepts of service, interface, object can be a bit confusing at first glance] An example program listening for these messages looks like this #!/usr/bin/python import dbus import gtk def udev_signal_received(dbus_iface, member, service, object_path, message): [filename, sysfs_path] = message.get_args_list() if member=='NodeCreated': print 'Node %s created for %s'%(filename, sysfs_path) elif member=='NodeDeleted': print 'Node %s deleted for %s'%(filename, sysfs_path) def main(): bus = dbus.Bus(dbus.Bus.TYPE_SYSTEM) bus.add_signal_receiver(udev_signal_received, 'org.kernel.udev.NodeMonitor', # interface 'org.kernel.udev', # service '/org/kernel/udev/NodeMonitor') # object gtk.mainloop() if __name__ == '__main__': main() and this is the output when hot-plugging some usb-storage. [david@laptop udev-008]$ ~/node_monitor.py Node /udev/sda created for /block/sda Node /udev/sda1 created for /block/sda/sda1 Node /udev/sda1 deleted for /block/sda/sda1 Node /udev/sda deleted for /block/sda The patch requires D-BUS 0.20 or later while the python example program requires D-BUS from CVS as I only recently applied a patch against the python bindings.
2005-04-26[PATCH] experimental (very simple) SYMLINK creationkay.sievers@vrfy.org
> > here is a experimental symlink creation patch - for discussion, > > in which direction we should go. > > It is possible now to define SYMLINK= after the NAME= in udev.rules. > > The link is relative to the node, but the path is not optimized now > > if the node and the link are in the same nested directory. > > Only one link is supported, cause i need to sleep now :) > > > > 06-simple-symlink-creation.diff > > simple symlink creation > > reorganized udev-remove to have access to the symlink field > > subdir creation/removal are functions now > > udev-test.pl tests for link creation/removal Here is a new version with relative link target path optimization an better tests in udev-test.pl: LABEL, BUS="scsi", vendor="IBM-ESXS", NAME="1/2/a/b/node", SYMLINK="1/2/c/d/symlink" Dec 7 06:48:34 pim udev[13789]: create_node: symlink 'udev-root/1/2/c/d/symlink' to node '1/2/a/b/node' requested Dec 7 06:48:34 pim udev[13789]: create_path: created 'udev-root/1/2/c' Dec 7 06:48:34 pim udev[13789]: create_path: created 'udev-root/1/2/c/d' Dec 7 06:48:34 pim udev[13789]: create_node: symlink(../../a/b/node, udev-root/1/2/c/d/symlink)
2005-04-26[PATCH] overall whitespace + debug text conditioningkay.sievers@vrfy.org
01-overall-whitespace+debug-text-conditioning.diff o cleanup whitespace o clarify a few comments o enclose all printed debug string values in ''
2005-04-26[PATCH] added ability to put format specifiers in the CALLOUT program string.greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] add support for string group and string user names in udev.permissions.greg@kroah.com
This only works if you are using glibc. Patch based on patch from Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
2005-04-26[PATCH] fix permissions to work properly now.greg@kroah.com
Forgot about umask in mknod...
2005-04-26[PATCH] get the major/minor number before we name the device.greg@kroah.com
Will come in handy later...
2005-04-26[PATCH] fix udev-add.c to build properly with older versions of gcc.greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] add support for subdirskay.sievers@vrfy.org
support subdirectory creation/removal for NAME="/devfs/is/crazy/video0" create parent subdirs for device node if needed remove subdirs when last node is removed
2005-04-26[PATCH] add uid/gid to nodeskay.sievers@vrfy.org
set uid/gid of node specified in udev.permissions only numeric id's are supported cause we can't resolve with klibc or libc before real /etc is mounted
2005-04-26[PATCH] udev: sleep_for_dev() bitsrml@tech9.net
OK, I fixed that bug you hinted at earlier in my previous sleep_for_dev() patch. I am sure you fixed it, but here we go nonetheless, just in case. I actually changed it up a bit. It is probably faster to count down from SECONDS_TO_WAIT_FOR_DEV than count up. I also made the lone 'path' argument const, since it can be. Some other misc. bits, too.
2005-04-26[PATCH] klibc specific tweaksgreg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] udev-add build cleanups for other libc versions.greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] got rid of struct device_attrgreg@kroah.com
namedev.c is still a mess, that's up next after testing...
2005-04-26[PATCH] udev: another canidate for staticrml@tech9.net
Another one of those "trivial patches so everything must be good" sleep_for_dev() isn't exported or defined in a header, so it can be marked 'static'
2005-04-26[PATCH] Fix bug causing udev to sleep forever waiting for dev file to show up.greg@kroah.com
Now we will timeout properly.
2005-04-26[PATCH] make config files, sysfs root, and udev root configurable from ↵greg@kroah.com
config variables This will make running tests a lot simpler.
2005-04-26[PATCH] major database cleanupsgreg@kroah.com
Now we standardise on a struct udevice to pass around, and store in the database. This cleaned up the database code a lot.
2005-04-26[PATCH] don't sleep if 'dev' file is already present on device add.greg@kroah.com
instead sleep for up to 10 seconds waiting for it to show up.
2005-04-26[PATCH] fix comment about how the "dev" file is made up.greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] udev: mode should be mode_trml@tech9.net
Unix file modes should be stored in a mode_t, not a standard type. At the moment it is actually unsigned, in fact, not a signed integer. Attached patch does an s/int mode/mode_t mode/ and cleans up the results.
2005-04-26[PATCH] udev: trivial trivialitiesrml@tech9.net
Yah yah, really trivial stuff... - get_class_device() doesn't need to be exported; it should be static - white space cleanup
2005-04-26[PATCH] got "remove of named devices" working.greg@kroah.com
database code still needs some major cleanup.
2005-04-26[PATCH] fix segfaults when dealing with partitions.greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] tell the user what mknod() we are trying to do.greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] merge tdb into the build process.greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] udevdb prototypedsteklof@us.ibm.com
Here's an "idea" of what I had in mind for udevdb. Let me preface the code with a few remarks: 1) I was expecting to write this udevdb for udev to keep track of devices. I was planning an external package that depends upon udev to provide an external API to the udevdb database. The calls for the interface would be read only access. Not sure how you want to do packaging, if having a separate package is ok or having it included in udev. 2) I created it as it is because udev isn't a daemon. So, the open database call doesn't take any parameters. My plan was to create a udevdb_init function that took arguments for initializing the db to start, where you could specify in memory only or a file location. This can all be filled in. 3) I hacked the Makefile to get it to work. Not sure how you'd want that in the future. 4) This assumes TDB has been installed elsewhere, you would need to edit your Makefile and point it to the header and library locations. How do you want to do TDB in udev? Do you want to just reference it and make udev dependent on that package being installed. Or should we do what samba does and include a limited tdb version in udev? 5) Again, I hacked udev into your existing code. In the future, I'd probably make a function around the filling out the udevice before calling the store command. Didn't know if you wanted to change your add device function to use struct udevice rather than having everything separate. 6) Not sure what we should include in the udevice structure that's stored by udev. I made a stab at a first shot - we can add and remove of course, this was a first pass. I've come to realize - with you including libsysfs in udev, the "external" interface that references udevdb could make use of getting information from through libsysfs from sysfs and doesn't need to be in udevdb. 7) I could write a namedevdb for namedev's device management if you wanted.
2005-04-26[PATCH] minor cleanups.greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] cleanup the mknod code a bit.greg@kroah.com
2005-04-26[PATCH] remove mknod calloutgreg@kroah.com
Patch from "Guo, Min" <min.guo@intel.com>
2005-04-26[PATCH] handle new major:minor format of dev files that showed up in ↵greg@kroah.com
2.6.0-test2-bk3 or so.
2005-04-26[PATCH] split udev main logic into udev-add and udev-remove.greg@kroah.com