Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
|
|
David: uh, don't you need curly braces in the udevd.c part at the bottom?
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace one
|
|
When a worker receives both a signal and a udev event in the same epoll_wait
run, the event must be processed first because the udev parent considers the
event already dispatched. If we process the signal first and exit, udevd
times out after 60 seconds waiting for a response from an already-dead
worker.
Ref: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/818177
Signed-off-by: Steve Langasek <steve.langasek@canonical.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Petr Uzel <petr.uzel@suse.cz>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many thanks to Tom Gundersen for identifying the issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 15:33, Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> wrote:
>
> Close, but no cigar. Looks like the static nodes are not assigned
> permissions 0660 even if a gid is set (the nodes have perms 0600).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The udev list already provides all we need, if we use the basename
as the key, and request sorting and uniqueness.
|
|
|
|
|