From 11fc2e833e454e65ff1123a091ab1a877a063e15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Gundersen Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:28:39 +0100 Subject: sd-rtnl: test - improve test of MTU a bit We are more likely to catch errors if we don't use '0' as test value. --- src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/test-rtnl.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/test-rtnl.c b/src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/test-rtnl.c index dc2e36c503..24015147cd 100644 --- a/src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/test-rtnl.c +++ b/src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/test-rtnl.c @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static void test_link_configure(sd_rtnl *rtnl, int ifindex) { static void test_link_get(sd_rtnl *rtnl, int ifindex) { sd_rtnl_message *m; sd_rtnl_message *r; - unsigned int mtu = 0; + unsigned int mtu = 1500; unsigned int *mtu_reply; void *data; uint16_t type; @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static void test_link_get(sd_rtnl *rtnl, int ifindex) { /* u32 read back */ assert(sd_rtnl_message_read(m, &type, (void **) &mtu_reply) == 1); assert(type == IFLA_MTU); - assert(*mtu_reply == 0); + assert(*mtu_reply == mtu); assert(sd_rtnl_message_read(m, &type, &data) == 1); assert(type == IFLA_GROUP); -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf