From 82adf6af7c72b852449346835f33184a841b4796 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:32:03 +0100
Subject: nspawn,man: use a common vocabulary when referring to selinux
 security contexts

Let's always call the security labels the same way:

  SMACK: "Smack Label"
  SELINUX: "SELinux Security Context"

And the low-level encapsulation is called "seclabel". Now let's hope we
stick to this vocabulary in future, too, and don't mix "label"s and
"security contexts" and so on wildly.
---
 man/systemd.journal-fields.xml | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'man/systemd.journal-fields.xml')

diff --git a/man/systemd.journal-fields.xml b/man/systemd.journal-fields.xml
index bb89ed58d3..c93b5da1dc 100644
--- a/man/systemd.journal-fields.xml
+++ b/man/systemd.journal-fields.xml
@@ -244,8 +244,8 @@
                                 <term><varname>_SELINUX_CONTEXT=</varname></term>
                                 <listitem>
                                         <para>The SELinux security
-                                        context of the process the
-                                        journal entry originates
+                                        context (label) of the process
+                                        the journal entry originates
                                         from.</para>
                                 </listitem>
                         </varlistentry>
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf