From ec251fe7d5bc24b5d38b0853bc5969f3a0ba06e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:50:10 -0500 Subject: tree-wide: adjust fall through comments so that gcc is happy gcc 7 adds -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 to -Wextra. There are a few ways we could deal with that. After we take into account the need to stay compatible with older versions of the compiler (and other compilers), I don't think adding __attribute__((fallthrough)), even as a macro, is worth the trouble. It sticks out too much, a comment is just as good. But gcc has some very specific requiremnts how the comment should look. Adjust it the specific form that it likes. I don't think the extra stuff we had in those comments was adding much value. (Note: the documentation seems to be wrong, and seems to describe a different pattern from the one that is actually used. I guess either the docs or the code will have to change before gcc 7 is finalized.) --- src/libsystemd/sd-device/sd-device.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/libsystemd') diff --git a/src/libsystemd/sd-device/sd-device.c b/src/libsystemd/sd-device/sd-device.c index bc5e92f8fe..efeadf0cd4 100644 --- a/src/libsystemd/sd-device/sd-device.c +++ b/src/libsystemd/sd-device/sd-device.c @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ int device_read_uevent_file(sd_device *device) { value = &uevent[i]; state = VALUE; - /* fall through to handle empty property */ + /* fall through */ /* to handle empty property */ case VALUE: if (strchr(NEWLINE, uevent[i])) { uevent[i] = '\0'; -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf