From f5e5c28f42a2f6d006785ec8b5e98c11a71bb039 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:47:14 -0500 Subject: tree-wide: check if errno is greater then zero gcc is confused by the common idiom of return errno ? -errno : -ESOMETHING and thinks a positive value may be returned. Replace this condition with errno > 0 to help gcc and avoid many spurious warnings. I filed a gcc rfe a long time ago, but it hard to say if it will ever be implemented [1]. Both conventions were used in the codebase, this change makes things more consistent. This is a follow up to bcb161b0230f. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61846 --- src/locale/localed.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/locale') diff --git a/src/locale/localed.c b/src/locale/localed.c index 5ca41331bd..8ab845eb80 100644 --- a/src/locale/localed.c +++ b/src/locale/localed.c @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ static int read_next_mapping(const char* filename, if (!fgets(line, sizeof(line), f)) { if (ferror(f)) - return errno ? -errno : -EIO; + return errno > 0 ? -errno : -EIO; return 0; } -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf